this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
761 points (99.7% liked)

No Lawns

3894 readers
891 users here now

What is No Lawns?

A community devoted to alternatives to monoculture lawns, with an emphasis on native plants and conservation. Rain gardens, xeriscaping, strolling gardens, native plants, and much more! (from official Reddit r/NoLawns)

Have questions or don't know where to begin?

Where can you find the official No Lawns socials?

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Bill was introduced in Sep/25, but I only got a whiff of it in the last couple of weeks

See House Bill HB1878: https://fastdemocracy.com/bill-search/pa/2025-2026/bills/PAB00038963/

Are there any other states/countries taking similar initiatives?

Summary:

Pennsylvania homeowners deserve the right to choose native plant species they desire for landscaping around their homes. However, work is needed to remove bottlenecks for homeowners to select native vegetation for their desired landscaping.

This legislation will prevent homeowners associations (HOAs) from unreasonably prohibiting the use of native plants for landscaping on private property. This ensures homeowners residing within an HOA the same ability to choose native landscaping as other homeowners.

Native plants provide many beneficial functions that many homeowners desire. These include being aesthetically pleasing and providing habitat for pollinators while being adapted to the site and typically requiring lower maintenance than non-native plants. [...]

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 4 points 37 minutes ago (1 children)

I'm a way it seems bizarre that HOAs should be so broadly despised yet also broadly adopted. I suppose it has to do with the corners of the culture I sit in.

[–] MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world 1 points 27 minutes ago (1 children)

I think the reason for the mass adoption is the surface selling point (higher resale property value) plus the usual minor fee lull people into a false understanding of just how dangerous they can become once a person on a power trip gets into the board

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 43 seconds ago

Municipalities are only giving licenses to new developments that have HOA included in, because HOAs transfer the necesario tax burden to the HOA. Americans would do anything for avoid paying taxes, including paying more for worst services paying private intermediates

[–] azureskypirate@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 hours ago

I had a thought the other day:

If your HOA sues you and YOU WIN, they (usually) have to pay your attorney fees in addition to their own.

But...you're part of the HOA. Your dues will go up to cover the costs of a stupid lawsuit that you beat.

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 14 points 6 hours ago

Oh, shit, right, so I get to share something I learned fairly recently.

For much of human history, wealth could be measured many ways but by far the most powerful currency was land. Land meant resources, and the land's value was determined by what respirce it produced: fertile floodplains meant crops, lakes for fishing, forests for hunting, and, worst-case scenario, moorland could be used for grazing livestock. But what if that wasn't enough? What if you had huge tracts of land but your narcissism and insecurity were so overwhelming that you just needed to prove yourself even more?

Enter: lawns. Lawns are fields of grass, which is a useless crop that can only really be used for grazing. But the grass is kept so short that livestock can't graze on it. But grass like that can only be grown on plains that are ideal for crops, so you need to get rid of the crops. And short grass needs tending, tending with more care than any crop, so you need to have workers dedicated to it. That's what a lawn is: it's bragging, it's saying "not only do I have loads of top-quality land and an army of workers, I can afford to piss away huge swathes of it for absolutely no reason other than to prove that I can." It's hard to image a greater and more grotesque display of boujee excess than the lawn.

Of course, this is what makes the modern lawn all the more pathetic: that neatly parcelled-out vast tract of land you can afford to squander as a display of your immeasurable wealth is, like, a few meters across. It's like the Stamford apes experiment: they know what they must do, but not why they're doing it and, if they knew what a lawn really was and where it came from, I can't imagine many would be quite so attached. Then again, maybe they would be. Maybe they really do think their home is a castle and that they live in a kingdom they can walk around in thirty second.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

The pic is an island landlocked by fertilizer, pesticides, bug repellents, artificial lighting, etc.

It’s better than nothing.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 20 points 7 hours ago

Can we vote to ban HOAs?

[–] spazzman6156@sh.itjust.works 20 points 8 hours ago

Just ban the fucking HOAs

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 22 points 8 hours ago

HOAs are the devil - even if I could afford property there's no house cheap enough to put up with one.

[–] bridgeburner@lemmy.world 39 points 9 hours ago (15 children)

Kinda funny how Americans call their country "land of the free" but can't even do certain things on THEIR OWN PROPERTY because of the HOAs.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 22 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Should we go down the list of things Americans can't do but the rest of the world can? The irony of holding up freedom as their cornerstone while keeping the largest inmate population over bullshit without even a trial.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 11 points 8 hours ago

Number one on that list is health insurance being tied to your job. As in, some people literally die if they quit their job. Very freedom, much America.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

When you're in an HOA, you've contracted away some of your rights to property.

But that's the devil's game of "property rights". So many people think they've gained sovereignty because money changed hands. They don't ask how property originates and why it was up for sale to begin with.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

None of these laws ever get enforced.

You call them out on it a year later and they just say "I didn't know that. Never heard of that law" and then they just keep doing whatever they were doing.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 8 points 7 hours ago

Wild you are accountable to strangers to this level.

[–] me_myself_and_I@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Ironic, I thought America was the land of the free? lol

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 90 points 15 hours ago

Maryland has HB232 which supersedes all HoA law and says any low impact landscaping / xeriscaping is permissible AND favored if it prioritizes native plants and fauna / pollinators.

The simplest thing to come of it is “you can’t force me to grow grass”

[–] notabot@piefed.social 77 points 15 hours ago (12 children)

HOAs are such a fascinatingly American thing. They seem to cause no end of annoyance for those living in them, and have few to no positive effects (at least, we don't hear about any positives), yet they persist.

Can those who are adversely affected not do anything about their local ones, or is it actually a case that they're not too bad for most people most of the time?

[–] BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

If you want to see the positives of HOAs, Google "What are the legal options for dealing with my neighbor Reddit."

Most people have a significant portion of their wealth tied into their property. Getting a new drug addicted neighbor three years before retirement could lead to unintended financial consequences. There are good HOAs, it's just that nobody complains about them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

have few to no positive effects

The purpose of an HOA (in theory) is to divide the costs of land maintenance across land owners.

In practice, HOAs are routinely abused for rent seeking and stigmatization of minorities. But that's not a problem specific to the legal arrangement. It's a consequence of the managers and members.

Check out the HBO show "Neighbors". A great look into the mind of a land owner.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 15 points 11 hours ago

You hear about the shitty ones, tbh.

Mine covers the community pool, a few small playgrounds, gym, community garden, etc. Thats it.

No getting approval to have your door be blue instead of white, no measuring your grass height, or any of those shenanigans.

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 51 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

There's very little people can do. In order to fix things you usually need to get on the board, but the people who run HOAs are usually retired nimby assholes and they hold meetings while most in the neighborhood are at work so nobody can oppose them. They then reelect themselves to the board and the cycle continues. HOAs are usually a thing set up by the builders to make their lives easier for some paperwork and stuff. They absolutely suck 99% of the time.

Native plant garden bans aren't just an HOA thing. Many counties or cities ban them too. Much of it stems for chemical manufacturers selling the white picket fence image after WWII to veterans receiving funding to buy a home. The chemical manufacturers pushed hard for that image so they could keep making as much profit as they made manufacturing for weapons during the wartime.

This means that trying to fight your HOA on yards is useless, you have to go higher and it's a big big fight

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Thats why you dont dight the HOA, you sabotage them with geurilla gardening.

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

I'm always down for conscious rebellion but that's a great way to get a lien on your house if you're caught for those who don't know.

Growing any food in our front yard is illegal in my city. Guess who's currently growing sage in the front garden.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 21 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

HOAs are usually a thing set up by the builders to make their lives easier for some paperwork and stuff.

Builders are encouraged by the local government to set up HOAs because it lets said government shirk its responsibility to maintain infrastructure and services.

If your subdivision is gated, its streets are private and the homeowners are responsible for repaving them, for instance.

(Of course, that's only a motivation cities caught onto relatively recently. The original reason for HOAs -- at least for neighborhoods of single-family houses, as opposed to condos that have legitimate shared maintenance -- was to help keep black people out.)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] sommerset@thelemmy.club 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Hey who in US is leading a fight for mandatory 30 day minimal vacations a year and, nationalization of all seashores and guaranteed health care?
I want to join

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 8 points 9 hours ago

Let's see...We've got the party that bombs foreigners for no reason, or... The other party that also bombs foreigners for no reason.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 31 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (11 children)

What's the point of even having a yard if it looks like the ones in the picture? Why not just go live in an apartment then. To me, owning a piece of land to enjoy was kind of the key reason I wanted to own a house in the first place.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

What’s the point of even having a yard if it looks like the ones in the picture?

Dog bathroom.

Where I live, it's a bathroom for other people's dogs.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 7 hours ago

More like HOE

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 hours ago

If you're rich enough to have a lawn or grounds then you should be able to decide what you do with it.

As we understand the over-use of land and bungalow sprawl's ignored issues, this will become a non-problem with the slow migration to proper consolidated, shared space.

load more comments
view more: next ›