this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2026
541 points (98.4% liked)

politics

29286 readers
2098 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago (4 children)

a) This headline forgets W losing Afghanistan

b) Fuck Nixon, but Eisenhower deserves the blame for Vietnam (admittedly one of the reasons he did that was because he thought it would give him political cover to shut McCarthyism down, but still)

Also Trump losing Afghanistan

[–] btsax@reddthat.com 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nixon continuing horrible foreign policy doesn't absolve him. Also he conspired with Hanoi to sabotage LBJ which is straight up treason and extended the war another five years

he conspired with Hanoi to sabotage LBJ

Oh, c'mon. Next you'll be telling me Reagan conspired with Iran to sabotage Carter!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I wonder how much better would he fare had he assisted the protester, in time, like he promised, instead of letting them get massacred only to start his own thing a few months later.

[–] spitfire@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I’m going to disagree with just one thing: the regime hasn’t really changed. But it isn’t and never was US&A’s fucking business. Change your own first ;)

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 21 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Has America actually ever won a war since Gulf War 1?

[–] keimevo@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago

I would amend that to "since WWII", and the answer would still be no.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Name one we have won since WWII?

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That really comes down to what you mean by "war" and "won".

We won the Korean war by achieving our strategic objectives- we bombed NK back to the stone age, and effectively isolated them from the rest of the world.

Our wars in Central America achieved their objectives- US trained death squads raped and murdered the local populations into submission; US corporations have been free to dominate ever since.

On the list of 80+ countries we have invaded since WWII, I would say well over half of these misadventures have achieved their strategic objectives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ductTapedWindow@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Desert Storm, but outside of that they've all been unsuccessful.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›