this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
95 points (97.0% liked)

politics

29198 readers
2209 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Donald Trump, other senior US officials and their cheerleaders appear to be embracing attacks – and threats of attacks – on Iranian civilian infrastructure, which legal experts say appears to constitute serious war crimes under international law.

“ In a rambling national address on Wednesday, the US president warned that if Iran did not reach an unspecified deal with him, US forces would “hit each and every one of their electric-generating plants” and “bring [Iran] back to the stone ages – where they belong”.

“Following through on that threat a day later, Trump posted images of a strike on the unfinished B1 bridge near Tehran, warning: “Much more to follow!””

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Akh@lemmy.world 42 points 5 hours ago

Yes, next question

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 30 points 5 hours ago

Amazing to see it in the wild: a rare question headline where the answer is yes.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 16 points 5 hours ago

International law experts ‘seriously concerned’ about ‘strikes on schools, health centres and homes’ in contravention of Geneva conventions.

Well there it is folks, we just witnessed the full force of the actions taken when someone commits a war crime. I'm sure the administration will correct their future actions to avoid more "serious concerns." Nothing stops a bloodthirsty tyrant like a wagging finger.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago

Oh please please can another country Maduro him for violating international law. America would thank you.

[–] cheers_queers@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 hours ago

the US is committing war crimes by targeting Iran’s civilian infrastructure. 

fixed that headline for them.

No nation did anything to stop israel from leveling gaza.

No nation is going to do anything to stop Iran from being attacked.

There's no consequences to the people making the decisions to do this stuff, and those carrying out the orders. We all know it's horrible. Nothing will happen though.

We just have to live with the side effects and the outcome. What else is gonna change? Certainly not politics until January 3rd of next year... unless the republicans change course, but good luck with that.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It's beyond the targeting of civilian infrastructure (which is a war crime)

They're deliberately "double tapping" which is a terrorist strategy (used by other shit governments like Israel) where you attack the same location roughly an hour later even tho the strike destroyed the target.

Because after the first strike, emergency responders have arrived, and the follow up is to kill them so they can't provide aid in that strike or any other.

There's almost no clearer war crime than that double tap, and Trump's been doing them as standard procedure because no one has called him out.

Hell just keep going bigger till someone stops them, and if the US government won't do it, if other governments won't do it, it doesn't leave many options to stop him

[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

it's like being a sniper, shooting someone in the kneecaps then shooting everyone that comes to rescue him

[–] cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 hours ago

I am not voting for anyone in the 2028 primary who does not agree that the US should comply with International Criminal Court arrest warrants. If the subject is no longer in government, they need to be dragged onto a plane and sent to stand trial.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Starting a war of aggression is already a war crime, which means Trump was guilty before we even set foot in (or flew over) Iran. Trying to use Betteridge's Law Of Headlines to spread doubt about it is not going to be enough, here.

And then 168-some-odd schoolchildren were murdered on Trump's orders. For this act alone he should be in irons already.

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago

It’s hard to remember he’s a massive pedophile deeply involved with Epstein when he’s committing all these war crimes right out in the open. Weird.