this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
18 points (90.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

41407 readers
942 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What is this recurring connection between big missiles sending men to the moon and the military industrial complex sending expeditionary forces overseas?

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Dude…

The US has always been at war.

All empires are always at war…

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, but Vietnam was a pinnacle of sorts, and Iran started pushing really hard and fast as launch day approached...

[–] mech@feddit.org 14 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

No matter when you launch the rocket, the US will be in some war overseas.

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 6 points 19 hours ago

No matter when you launch the rocket, the US will be losing some war overseas

Ftfy

[–] morto@piefed.social 3 points 15 hours ago

The space race and proxy wars were a huge part of the cold war, and now, many things point to some kind of new cold war. I'm surprised by the amount of people claiming that there's no connection.

[–] early_riser@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Pretty sure Artemis was in the works long before this. If you want to talk suspiciously convenient timing, look at the intervention in Venezuela just before before Iran.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Artemis has been in the works for over 20 years, this is the first time the project didn't get delayed for ... reasons.

[–] hank@programming.dev 1 points 7 hours ago

Wasn’t Artemis II meant to launch in 2023?

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 6 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Classic example of correlation not being causation.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

While the relationships may not be causal, there are literally millions of connections.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Ok, since there are literally millions of connections, list 50.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Start with the thousands of contractors who drift back and forth between NASA and military contracts.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That's not millions of links, though. It's just that building rockets is a thing only a handful of companies are equipped to do.

The better metric to look at is which country is the US trying to show up. In 69 it was Russia, and today it's China.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Each contract worker is a link. Each company is a link. Each congress critter playing for missile pork projects in their district is a link. And this isn't just about the missiles, as you say: who are we trying to impress? What are we trying to get in exchange for that impression?

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's not about getting something in exchange. It's about showing off with a display of power.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 11 hours ago

So, by "in exchange" I don't mean quid-pro-quo China ships the U.S. 25 tons of Rare Earth metals because they're so impressed, I mean: what results are they expecting? Congress critters generally are looking for re-election and all the perks that come with long term tenure in a seat. Lobbyists are generally lookig for more pork from their critters. Contractor firms are looking for that pork as "contracts" they can overbill and under deliver for with impunity, etc. etc. There are international results expected as well, such as greater negotiating power to get more advantageous positions in agreements.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Monument building is the reaction of a scared nation. It's historically been a cheap way to boost national unity