this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
543 points (99.6% liked)

politics

29219 readers
2804 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

“We can’t use American money on Americans because we need to keep murdering those colored people” has been the US policy since the 60s.

The 1760s.

[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 146 points 2 days ago (6 children)

10 years ago, a statement like this from ANY potus would have turned into a month off front-page freakout. Now? It gets a one-second shrug.

Fuck. Where we are now. So quickly.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 71 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not even 10 years ago tbh... If Biden said this when he was president, Republicans would inexplicably become the number one advocates of healthcare and childcare and screech endlessly about him being a warmonger for several news cycles.

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago (6 children)

It’s not “10 years ago,” because it has nothing to do with time passing. It has everything to do with Republicans doing a coordinated and concerted capture of all media.

It goes away because they want it to - the silly non-news used to stick around for a month because of their manipulation. It’s important to remember and talk about this widely

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Remember Mustardgate? I do and I'm not even American...

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The tan suit. What a jerk!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 9 points 1 day ago

The GOP effectively castrated news outlets and favored them to conservative propaganda.

[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

Maybe, but in my entire lifetime (certainly more than 10 years), Republican POTUS can say or do literally anything they want with little to no actual repercussions at the polls. I feel 100% confident that Reagan could have said this, his policies were doing this just not so explicitly stated. Bush Jr got the USA into war over false pretenses and it took many, many years after his presidency was long over before public opinion shifted slightly on the topic in terms of realizing how wrong it was.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I doubt it would have applied to the cons.

IOKIYAR.

Newt and his team have been working to divide America since at least 1990. Actively. And it gets little mention. Meanwhile, plenty of reactionary centrists and nearly all of the mainstream media and of course the unhinged right wing would say things like "Obama is divisive" as some kind of serious analysis.

Meanwhile, the cons have been intentionally trying to divide. And were not called on it every single day, as they should be.

The GOPAC memo "Language: A Key Mechanism of Control" is something every American should be aware of, but I bet maybe 1% are.

So if earlier asshole GOP POTUSes were to blurt this out before, it would probably get bothsidered and downplayed back then, too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SirMaple__@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"Why aren't people having kids anymore?"

I hope the fertility rate drops to South Korea levels.

I'm doing my part!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

Since Palantir has all the voting registrations linked to all the social security numbers, Musk raided and kept all our sensitive data, and the age of the draft has gone up, how much you want to bet the government suddenly drafts only the younglings who happen to be a Democrat to fight and die in his war?

[–] RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The drafts throughout history in many countries have always been done this way to varying degrees. It is partially seen as a way to mow the lawn as the elite class would see it. Whoever the undesirables are at that point in time get to go into the meat grinder first. Most recently, Russia has done this in Ukraine... Sending convicts, minority groups, poor people, etc, to the front line. Modern systems now would allow specific targeting of a draft to political opponents, specific areas of certain groups, and so on.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 46 points 2 days ago (5 children)

And don’t those things (daycare, healthcare, Medicare) have high returns on value too? Because the workers benefitting from them are then more productive, so government recoups the investment in its people via taxes. Health issues can be tackled earlier when they’re cheaper. I’d assume less property crime as people are less desperate, etc etc. Funding domestic social programs is always the right move

[–] Duranie@leminal.space 44 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There was a saying I heard a while back that keeps popping up. A version of "Democrats would rather feed 100 people in case one was hungry, Republicans would rather withhold food from 100 people in case one didn't deserve it."

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 13 points 2 days ago

Just in case, this is Democratic and Republican voters. Democratic politicians mostly agree with Republicans on this but in a pinch will means test 100 hungry people to find and feed the hungriest of them.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

That is not even accurate, their leaders, the ones controlling the party, want to starve all the poor, they want nothing but harm to the poor, because that's what the party wants, and they believe in nothing other than self interest.

[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago

While you are absolutely right, you’re also out of your mind if you think the president gives even one shit about high returns on value to anyone other than himself.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Literally setting cash on fire has a higher return on value than war.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And how many servants did he pay to take care of his kids?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well it looks like I'm not going to be able to pay my taxes this year.

[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I hear so many people make that statement. I realize most are just making a flippant "joke".

Not paying your taxes, assuming you owe any federal taxes, is a recipe for a whole heap of trouble and expensive if you're working class. This isn't VISA where you can basically just ignore the debt for X number of years and then you're in the clear. The federal government has considerably more options for getting the money owed.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

government can't come for you if your tear it down and build a new one

[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (15 children)

And unicorns can't fart if you steal their butts!

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] btsax@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago

I know you said this as a joke but there are tons of legal ways to avoid taxes.

-Contribute to a retirement account or health savings account

-Create a business around one of your hobbies and deduct all your expenses for that hobby

-Purchase certain treasuries or municipal bonds

-Bribe a government official

[–] NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We can't take care of these little things. These scams you got going on...

Amazing that the health and education of the people are simultaneously little things, scams, and unaffordable by the federal government.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 5 points 1 day ago

the oligarchy have a vested interest in NOT educating the people. If the people were educated, they'd realise they're being fucked in every hole by the oligarchy.

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

TBF you never see billionaires complain about not having access to health care or high education. More proof that poor people are always complaining. /s just in case...

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 10 points 1 day ago

Trump is a pathologically lying, maliciously narcissistic, brain damaged, subhuman troglodyte, so yeah that tracks.

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Truly behavior fitting of the recipient of the inaugural America First and FIFA Peace awards.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (3 children)

And 40% of Americans still think he's Jesus Incarnate.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Look, its the (nearly?) richest country in the world!

[–] aquovie@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 day ago

its the (nearly?) richest country

Not at this rate.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago
[–] unnamed1@feddit.org 24 points 2 days ago (10 children)

I can’t help but feel so sorry for all the Americans. No one deserves this. He’s gambling with so many lives of innocent people. Before Trump I didn’t know democracy would be so delicate.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Greetings from Germany. We have known for a long time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

It can, it just won't. Thats why he's got to go

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And if you can't afford to pay for The Amerisraeli War,® don't worry, we'll soon have a draft for you!

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He also said states should raise taxes and pay for daycare and healthcare themselves.

[–] wavebeam@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I agree. States should raise the tax rate to 90% for anyone who makes more than a million a year. Good idea, Mr covfefe

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Must be the reason his spiritual consultant compare him to Jesus. This exactly what Jesus would do.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't worry, everyone.

The Treasury just declared the US is insolvent. We can't afford the WARS either.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

"They should pay, they have to raise their taxes," Trump continued. "But they should pay for it. And we could lower our taxes a little bit to them to make up, but we, it's not possible for us to take care of daycare, Medicaid, Medicare, all these individual things."

looks at Florida... if only their immigrants were healthy young people.

Cutting federal taxes, and federal state funding, in order to ask states to raise taxes is, FYI, a shell game. Clear sign of imminent federal collapse, which is not a "comfort factor" for states.

While fair and friendly state secession involves accepting a net share of federal debts to assets, fuck all y'all secession is an escape from insance clown possee, suggesting a fuck all y'all entitlements (non) reimbursement plan. California is unfortunately governed by zionist federal power monger aspirationalist, but California accepting US tariff and energy policy is significant harm to California, before this BS.

load more comments
view more: next ›