this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
563 points (98.0% liked)

News

36942 readers
3156 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"We are the only Country in the World STUPID enough to allow “Birthright”...

Don't most countries allow birthright citizenship?

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Pretty much the entirety of north and south america do this, probably to ensure the end of slavery and similar colonial practices. The fact Europe doesn't do this is kinda crazy.

[–] BlindFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

probably to ensure the end of slavery and similar colonial practices

Thank you for this. I never thought of birthright citizenship this way. Where could I read more about this

[–] johncandy1812@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"Humiliated" "storms out" - this is some tabloidly language.

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 2 points 19 hours ago

He is a narcissist, humiliation is not part of their makeup. Only thing it knows is hate and derision.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

headlines like that are why I stopped going to any Meidas network content

I think they really fucked themselves over with that. like, sure, some of the time it was an accurate serious statement (but not enough people in america care, so it appeared that it wasn't actually as serious but in fact it was just the response to it that was not serious), but a lot of the time they just use clickbait titles and then you're sitting there like wait that's it?

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I think they started it as a way to combat the rights headlines that were over the top and show right wingers its ridiculousness. But it’s getting a bit long in the tooth if you ask me.

[–] human@slrpnk.net 301 points 2 days ago (23 children)

Justice Neil Gorsuch, who was also appointed by Trump, added to the pressure Sauer faced, asking the seasoned Solicitor General: “Do you think Native Americans are birthright citizens under your test?”

“Ah, I think... so,” he replied, somewhat unconvincingly. “I’ll have to think that through.”

Is that literally the first time he's thought about that?

[–] CrossingPoints@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

It isn't. All of the "quotes" the SG was using were Indian law cases about denying Natives citizenship. Gorsuch is an expert in Indian law. He was calling that out.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 143 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Think is too strong a term here.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago

Aware is too strong a term.

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Deport those ungrateful native Americans back to…America???

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

I suggest you deport them back to where they came from, typically the nicer, more habitable parts of the United States, and give them whatever is there now. It's a poor deal for the Lenape, though, as they'd get New Jersey.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 55 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It could be. The point of bringing a case like this probably isn't to win it, necessarily, but to demonstrate loyalty to dear leader. Dear Leader wants the case in order to push the Overton window. Its a can't-lose situation for the regime; they get some benefit from either judicial decision.

[–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 46 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The mission is to flood the zone in the hopes that some of their bullshit slips through. The more of it that fails, the better. I don't think losing this ruling is a mortal blow for MAGA in any sense, but it will be better for Americans if this is one of the ones that fails.

Also just to normalize it in the American zeitgeist. Them entertaining it gives the illusion that there's some merit to the argument. In a year or two when everyone believes there's legitimate arguments on both sides of the issue due to it being an issue they keep hearing about in the news, they'll ratchet it a few steps further toward their goal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago

I fucking hate that guy and his stupid asshole voice.

[–] Alabaster_Mango@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 days ago (3 children)

If you put a "> " on the empty line then the quote formatting line thingy will be contiguous.

> Like
>
> This

Like

This

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 110 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Gorsuch asked if Native Americans would be considered birthright citizens, and the MAGA lawyer said he'd "have to give it some thought."

Shouldn't he have done that BEFORE appearing in front of SCOTUS?

Honestly though, if the Supreme Court were doing their job even slightly properly, the response from the justices to that facile punt of an answer to a very obvious question should have been to utterly excoriate the lawyer - up to, and hopefully including, dismissal with prejudice. The response that fucker gave shows a very obvious lack of preparedness and consideration - or more likely, very thinly veiled contempt of the court.

[–] LadyButterfly@reddthat.com 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

He'd have to give it some thought??? Jesus fucking Christ

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

And Chief Justice John Roberts, another conservative on the bench, also had something of a mic-drop moment when Sauer tried to make the point that “we’re in a new world where eight billion people are one plane ride away from having a child who’s a U.S citizen.”

Roberts replied: “It’s a new world. It’s the same Constitution.”

I expect this is where they pivot next. What does it take to amend the American constitution? Or what does it take to make a new one, given that they will try to justify that an old document does not fit the modern world

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It would be impossible in today's political climate.

You need >66% vote in both House and Senate, or you need a Constitutional Convention called by >66% of the state legislatures. Then you need to ratify the amendment, which requires approval by >75% of state legislatures.

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What could pass 75% of states?

In this day and age it amazes me we ever had that level of consensus. Something is super broken.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

Currently 94% of states have medical marijuana yet its still federally illegal and scheduled as a drug with no medical value. That's a good indicator of consensus not meaning jack to the federal government.

[–] sartalon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Same as how they passed prohibition.

It's actually quite fascinating even as it is disconcerting.

They lobbied state by state, and focused on a few key legislators, threatening their seat, until the rest fell in line.

They didn't have to fight them all at once, so they could focus their resources.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LadyButterfly@reddthat.com 12 points 1 day ago

New world same constitution... God they're right. And I totally agree Trump would change it if he possibly could.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Vupware@lemmy.zip 30 points 2 days ago

This calls for a return to form. Happy YDAU everyone.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 140 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A space launch and the Supreme Court doing its job?

It's like america has a functioning government!!

/s

[–] jellyfishhunter@lemmy.world 163 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's April 1st. Maybe it's just a prank

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 40 points 2 days ago (3 children)

For some reason I can't imagine Trump without a full diaper anymore. When I see the news that he went to SCOTUS hearing I'm thinking "and he was sitting there in a full diaper?". I'm reading that he stormed out and I'm thinking "he can walk with a full diaper? what's that like?". Full diaper is now integral part of his image for me, can't help it.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago

He had a poopy diaper and he needed someone to wipe his pedo bum

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 43 points 2 days ago

Alito sounded like a completely obtuse nincomcoop today. You don’t need to be a constitutional lawyer to see how full of shit the conservatives are.

[–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 60 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Roberts replied: “It’s a new world. It’s the same Constitution.”

There's the Chief I know. Originalist in the streets, textualist in the sheets.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 51 points 2 days ago (11 children)

FYI: About 35 countries have birthright citizenship, mostly on the American continent. Over 150 countries have citizenship by descent.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I always thought that was neat since it's mostly a happy accident from needing to allow freed slaves citizenship. I much prefer that over some sort of bloodline metric.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

more like trump storms out to create a gaffe at distracting the media from epstein. it happens everytime epstein starts rearing its head, or when something he did was too severe for the media to ignore.

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It’s exhausting to hear this, but 100% true. Trump creates daily outrage so there’s no oxygen in the room to focus on his crimes. We were talking about unredacting the files, holding Trump to account in the court of public opinion, and everything fell away again because he used our military to wage war. It’s taken over the conversation, again, with what remains being posts like these reminding people almost in vain that hey, if Trump breathes a word or walks from point A to B while on camera, its to distract the public from organizing over the truth that he is a narcissistic rapist pedophile with the ability to end the world.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Humiliation? Like he's capable of it. He tweeted they were dumb as he left. As far as he's concerned, he won.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 33 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Trump has never once felt humiliated in his life.

load more comments (5 replies)

Orders DOW to call in an air strike on SCOTUS.

load more comments
view more: next ›