this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
224 points (97.1% liked)

News

36942 readers
2580 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

James Broadnax has been locked up in a 6ft-by-10ft cell on death row in Texas for more than 16 years, and in that time he has developed coping mechanisms for passing the long and desolate days.

A favourite technique is to write spoken word poetry at his cell desk. He becomes so engrossed in the creative process that he can lose himself for hours, transfixed in what he calls a “time gap”.

Broadnax is set to enter the execution chamber in Huntsville, Texas, on 30 April. He will be strapped to a gurney and injected with a lethal dose of pentobarbital – his life snuffed out in no small part because of the prosecutorial use, or misuse, of his poetry. In 2009, Broadnax, who is African American, was convicted along with his cousin of murdering two white men, Matthew Butler and Stephen Swan, during a robbery in Garland, Texas. He was found guilty by a jury from which Dallas county prosecutors had initially excluded all Black jurors, until the trial judge stepped in and reinstated one of them.

During the sentencing phase of Broadnax’s capital trial, prosecutors presented the jury with 40 pages of the defendant’s notebooks found in a suitcase after his arrest. The state carefully selected rap lyrics infused with violent images of murder, robbery and drugs, to make the case that Broadnax should be sentenced to death. Its lawyers skirted over lyrics addressing peaceful narratives such as redemption and love. For the ultimate punishment to be secured under Texas law, jurors would have to be persuaded that the defendant posed a threat of “future dangerousness”.

By leaning heavily on rap lyrics and racist dog whistles, Texas prosecutors managed to drown out mitigating evidence that might have spared Broadnax’s life. His defense lawyers emphasised that Broadnax was just 19 when the murders took place. He had endured an abusive childhood at the hands of a grandmother who locked him up in his room without food and frequently beat him. And despite such a traumatic background, he had no previous criminal record other than a single conviction for non-violent marijuana possession.

The jury was clearly less swayed by such details than by the prosecutors’ lurid invocation of the rap lyrics. Jurors asked to see the notebooks twice during their deliberations. Then they sent Broadnax to death row.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 19 hours ago

I wouldn’t support the death penalty regardless but I also wouldn’t be swayed at all about anything if someone told me with a straight face “now consider this person doesn’t have a prior criminal history before murdering someone.” He went straight to murder isn’t the flex his lawyer thought it was.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 1 day ago

Johnny Cash was never convicted of the killing of a man in Reno.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Are you telling me Johnny Cash didn't really kill a man in Reno just to watch him die?

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Was Cash ever brought up on charges of murder?

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

MF DOOM had something to say

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dERcdvcXuE0

Reminds me of the concept album "I Killed Darnell Simmons"

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Man...cannibal corpse better hope that no one in texas decides to review their lyrics. For all the bluster Texans tend to puff up with, they are some of the most easily offended people I've met. Especially if you don't like their state.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Conservatives are early triggered regardless of what state they're in

[–] JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

Ususlly denial and repression

[–] Soulg@ani.social 4 points 1 day ago

I mean, it's pretty much just conservatives. And they're just as easily triggered in Texas as in anywhere else

[–] bss03 6 points 1 day ago

The writers of "reality" are a bunch of plagiarists: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14WE3A0PwVs /s

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So by “rap lyrics”, they mean stuff he wrote himself?

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It wouldn't be the first time a defendant's writings were used against them. What is the indication that it was about them being 'rap'? They were apparently in the form of free style poetry, not recorded or otherwise set to music.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

It's in the summary above and the article.

During the sentencing phase of Broadnax’s capital trial, prosecutors presented the jury with 40 pages of the defendant’s notebooks found in a suitcase after his arrest. The state carefully selected rap lyrics infused with violent images of murder, robbery and drugs, to make the case that Broadnax should be sentenced to death. Its lawyers skirted over lyrics addressing peaceful narratives such as redemption and love. For the ultimate punishment to be secured under Texas law, jurors would have to be persuaded that the defendant posed a threat of “future dangerousness”.

By leaning heavily on rap lyrics and racist dog whistles, Texas prosecutors managed to drown out mitigating evidence that might have spared Broadnax’s life. His defense lawyers emphasised that Broadnax was just 19 when the murders took place. He had endured an abusive childhood at the hands of a grandmother who locked him up in his room without food and frequently beat him. And despite such a traumatic background, he had no previous criminal record other than a single conviction for non-violent marijuana possession.

The jury was clearly less swayed by such details than by the prosecutors’ lurid invocation of the rap lyrics. Jurors asked to see the notebooks twice during their deliberations. Then they sent Broadnax to death row.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yes, I read that about three times. What is it exactly that makes his writings “rap lyrics“?

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why are you so weirdly fixated on the "rap lyrics" part? All songs, including rap songs generally get written down on paper first and plenty of rap songs start out as "poetry" first.

The issue here isnt whether these were rap lyrics or poetry. The issue is that they prosecutor cherry picked artistic works to make the guy seem like some sort of animal that needs to be put to death. They're misrepresenting facts in order to end a person's life.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It being about rap and racism are what the entire article and headline here address. Do I need to quote it for you? "Prosecutors used hip-hop lyrics to help sentence a man to death: ‘This only happens to rap music’". So I am addressing what appears to be the entire topic? I agree, the way the court system works should be the focus, not that the dude is black. But it's not.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (7 children)

In every media source I've read about this the 40 pages are listed as having rap lyrics. Maybe that's how the cops described it, or the prosecutors decided that's what they'd label it to gain the death penalty.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Someone really should've arrested Bob Marley (original composer/performer) and Eric Clapton (more famous cover version) for their insidious rap "I Shot the Sheriff"

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Were either of them ever accused of murdering someone? No, so what court case would that have have been evidence for?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Clapton let his kid walk out a window

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Definitely could’ve reflected on him if he had been writing poetry for 10 years about how he hates kids and thinks they’re useless and he wants them to die

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

Deputy got promoted and he's like case closed

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

Jfc it's like the Darnell Simmons skit from Key and Peele.

[–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 days ago (4 children)

"Future dangerousness"? Boy, we never should have gave you English. Texan English is in itself an overcompensation. It's somehow worse than German combine words.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Now, are your linguistics prescriptive or descriptive?

[–] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Bananskal@nord.pub 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Dangerification.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] VinegarChunks@lemmus.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A defendant's statements should not become inadmissible in court just because they are expressed in the form of rap lyrics.

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

So Robert Bloch's "statements" in the book Psycho should be able to be used to convict him of murder or other such? Should he have been put on trial. Clearly he had violent tendencies because of the fiction he wrote.

Furthermore:

Its lawyers skirted over lyrics addressing peaceful narratives such as redemption and love.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

This is why in California Song lyrics are no longer admissible as evidence

[–] VinegarChunks@lemmus.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If he was on trial for an unsolved murder he could have plausibly been present for, and the murder relates to the description he wrote in his book, yes absolutely the fact he wrote about similar murders should be presentable to the jury. Of course it should! How would that not be relevant?

I would not think that it would be enough to convict on its own but absolutely it could be supporting evidence.

Had he not already been acquitted, OJ Simpson’s book “If I Did It” should absolutely have been admissible as evidence against him in the murder trial even though he put the word “If” in the title

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I guess?

Should the playing of shooter/violent games also be possible evidence?

In some cases I can see where there might be some overlap, like in OJ Simpson's case. But in other cases, like this one, it gives me some pause. Maybe it can support a case, but it sure as hell shouldn't carry one.

By leaning heavily on rap lyrics and racist dog whistles, Texas prosecutors managed to drown out mitigating evidence that might have spared Broadnax’s life

load more comments
view more: next ›