this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
137 points (95.4% liked)

Technology

83295 readers
4874 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] west2seven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

That really sucks I wanted to build a magic mirror with a Pi.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago

Jesus who is spending $200+ on a raspberry pi?

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Remembered I had an unopened Pi5-8GB on the shelf.

[–] pluge@piefed.social 15 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I almost bought a RPi and realized I'd get better value at a Dell mini PC. Sure it's significantly bigger than a Pi, but it's still small enough for my use case. I just don't see a good reason to get a Pi anymore. It used to be a cheap hobbyist board. Now it's...something else.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

I wanted to upgrade my kids from Pi 4s to Pi 5s, but ended up just getting NUCs instead.

[–] PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social 1 points 6 hours ago

The only thing I can think of is GPIO compatibility these days.

[–] FrederikNJS@piefed.zip 62 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I realised a while ago that it's way cheaper to hunt for second-hand intel NUCs, and the resulting machine is way more powerful... And the RAM and storage is upgradeable, if the NUC didn't come with plenty of storage or RAM already...

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 10 hours ago (5 children)

Basically the only benefit the Pi has is GPIO pins for embedded projects.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 48 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Which a $3 ESP32 can handle instead.

[–] CocaineShrimp@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Where do you get your ESP32s from? They're $10 each on Amazon

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 hours ago

AliExpress. I only use Amazon for stuff like this if I need it within a day or two.

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago

Yup. If you really need GPIO + any real power, either go with an ARM board from AliExpress or do NUC + ESP32 with a serial connection between them.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 8 hours ago

I've been enjoying tinkering with the Pico. In my experience it's easier to flash than an esp chip.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Pi is also a fraction of the power consumption (meaning also heat dissipation requirements) and physical size.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Low power draw but ridiculous power supply requirements of 5V5A (depending on the model) with a USB-C connector which isnt a thing outside of this specific application meaning they're going to be expensive and hard to source. They should have just done a barrel plug or put an effing voltage regulator on board like Arduinos.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

The 5V5A supply is optional, the Pi 5 alone works perfectly fine using a standard 5V3A USB-PD supply, it just limits the maximum combined USB port current to 600mA.
But technically they are still in USB-PD spec: it's apparently okay for a charger to support 5V5A, and a device to "prefer" to use that if it's available. It can't be required, but as said, the Pi 5 works with 5V3A, so it isn't.

It's still dumb, and they should have just used 9V3A instead and paid the dollar for the stepdown circuitry like everyone else.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 9 hours ago

It really needs USB-PD support with an onboard regulator, but of course that would be way too crazy to implement.

Pi's were cool up until the 3b and everything after has just not been good for the form factor. Conveniently, the 3B was about the time they started prioritizing selling volume to commercial customers.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Low power draw but ridiculous power supply requirements of 5V5A (depending on the model) with a USB-C connector which isnt a thing outside of this specific application meaning they’re going to be expensive and hard to source.

That's only for the Pi 5 (the highest end unit), and I'll agree that at that level its hard to justify a Pi over a larger computer. Even for the Pi 5 its not that hard to find those Power Supplies. Most laptops today use power supplies that meet or exceed those specs. You're right that those are more expensive than Pi 4 and below Power Supplies.

They should have just done a barrel plug or put an effing voltage regulator on board like Arduinos.

Again, no defense of Pi 5 from me. However, for everything below Pi 5, HARD PASS on a voltage regulator. I don't want that heat in the tiny Pi case. At the lower power requirements of Pi4 and below USB power is fine.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Most laptops today use power supplies that meet or exceed those specs.

Non those are USB-PD power supplies that increase voltage up to 20V in order to deliver more power. No USB standard that I'm aware of offers 5A at 5V.

As far as heat goes, these devices already need heatsinks and case fans, so the difference seems negligible.

Also, good luck using a Pi5 any further than 3ft from a wall outlet unless you want to rig up your own power supply using some 14/2 Romex with a USB C connector soldered to the end.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

As far as heat goes, these devices already need heatsinks and case fans, so the difference seems negligible.

Pi 4 and below don't require active cooling. I want to keep it that way.

Also, good luck using a Pi5

Again, I offer no defense of Pi5. I don't use it and don't recommend it.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not sure why you're referring to the Pi4 since it doesn't require this entirely non-standard power supply and isn't their current flagship model. Nobody is asking for old models to be retrofitted with voltage regulators so that they don't have to use a power supply that they already don't need to use.

You say you don't use or recommend the Pi5 and yet you're seemingly arguing that its power supply requirements aren't a big deal and that improvements should absolutely not be made to it.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

First, I think we both don't like the Pi5. So we are in agreement on that. If you want we can stop right there on the same page.

I’m not sure why you’re referring to the Pi4

My first post in this thread was talking about Pi low power and small physical size. I was talking about all Raspberry Pis in general. I never put forth the Pi5. You did when you raised the 5V5A requirement. That exists only on the Pi5. You'll also see in that first post of mine is where I disavowed any recommendation of Pi5.

You then went on in your next post about Raspberry Pis needing active cooling and heat sinks. Again, that is only the Pi5, which again, I said I don't support.

So if you're wondering why I keep talking about Pi4 and below is because those are the ones I like. In this thread you keep posting facts about Pi5 (without pointing out that those only apply to Pi5), and so that's why I keep referring to Pi4 (and below).

You say you don’t use or recommend the Pi5 and yet you’re seemingly arguing that its power supply requirements aren’t a big deal and that improvements should absolutely not be made to it.

I'm arguing power supply requirements shouldn't be made to Pi4 (or below). I don't use Pi5.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 hours ago

My thinkcentre draws power but not that much power. Also, just combine it with an ESP and you get the best of two worlds.

[–] 73ms@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 hours ago

I think the ecosystem has some more benefits besides that. Ready to use case, cooler, camera, display options and lots of resources for putting these things together compared to NUCs/minipcs. I do like how the compute modules are even more flexible with the ability to choose from various carrier boards. Really depends on your use case which makes the most sense.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 1 points 10 hours ago

and you can replicate that nowadays with an RP2040. Hell, the newer Pi models already kinda do that with the RP1 handling GPIO (among other things)

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 3 points 6 hours ago

Plus x86 compatibility

[–] bonenode@piefed.social 29 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Fucking hell. I want to get off Mr Bones wild ride.

[–] redditmademedoit@piefed.zip 3 points 9 hours ago

Finally, I see this referenced in the wild

[–] cat_fishing@feddit.online 28 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I’m hoping this is just April Fools

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 34 points 10 hours ago

It would be an April Fools joke if it were a price drop instead.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 10 hours ago

You know it's not :(

[–] redditmademedoit@piefed.zip 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I would have been in the market for one, but they were already a terrible value proposition.

Meanwhile, Mac Mini prices have held stable at an already good price/performance ratio...

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

From my understanding Apple has memory contracts locked in for years ahead. This is a benefit they have for being an enormous player in the consumer electronics world. They can keep their memory prices "low" (or at least what Apple normally considers low) because of that.

Other smaller manufacturers don't have that luxury. When their current contracts run out they have to negotiate new ones, and they will be negotiated at the current market rate.

[–] clubb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 hours ago

The poor will only get poorer, and the rich will only get richer...