this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
31 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

83295 readers
5300 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The struggle to manufacture transformers, switchgear and batteries domestically has forced the US to rely on imports, delaying data center construction.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 10 hours ago

I guess that's why our local electrical parts factory built a new wing. Before, they'd have a football field size area completely full.

[–] Teknikal@anarchist.nexus 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Interesting I was reading they can't replace all their damaged radars anymore either because China is the only real supplier of Gallium and more than a bit annoyed with them.

All this tarrif and insulting everyone business is probably going to bite them back hard and for a long long time.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

China is the only real supplier of Gallium

Like many other critical materials and rare Earth's (of which Gallium isn't one), the USA has sizable deposits of the materials. What we lack is the ability to refine it usually because the process to do so is so ecologically toxic.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Surely there has to be some way of mitigating the ecological damage. Although I'm sure it's "too expensive".

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Surely there has to be some way of mitigating the ecological damage.

Absolutely there is for most rare Earths or critical minerals!

Although I’m sure it’s “too expensive”.

Yep. Or rather, it is far cheaper to accomplish if you don't give a shit about the environment.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 19 hours ago