this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
335 points (99.4% liked)

News

36889 readers
4473 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 20 points 13 hours ago

One of the sources, who claims Banks tried to invite him along on one of these trips, told the Examiner, “I don’t know how he became the chief of the Border Patrol with his character. He’s going to third-world countries to take advantage of poor f------ women, which disgusts the hell out of me.”

This guy is so close to getting it.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 102 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The President rapes children. When you set the standard that low, this story feels like responsible government by comparison.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 29 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This isn't unique to the president, it's a product of the institution.

Obama's SS agents got busted visiting brothels in Brazil. Bush Jr's torture prisons regularly had soldiers engaged in rape and other forms of sexual humiliation. The IDF is flush with these sadomasochist freaks. Texas children's prisons get a scandal every three to five years about wardens pimping out prisoners or just abusing them for sport.

This is just cop shit. Always been with us. Never gets properly investigated or prosecuted. It's a function of the system.

[–] pcn@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago

I recall that it was cathouses in Columbia

[–] Steve@startrek.website 18 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 11 points 13 hours ago

It was Thailand, so...

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago

"Do you have a military discount?"

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 14 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I don't see the point of making a big deal out of someone utilizing SW services. Were the girls (or guys no judgey) like 14 years old or something?

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 16 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

agreed, but only if it's not someone who is part of an organization that routinely demeans SWs and the like

otherwise, shame the hypocrites

[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 6 points 14 hours ago

I also like that angle but I just know most people reading this tidbit are going to have more of an issue with him using SWs at all than the hypocrisy.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 2 points 15 hours ago
[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 27 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

I mean screw this guy, but point out something that actually matters. This is for pearl clutchers

[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

His "accusers" are his colleagues and underlings, people he apparently bragged about this to. He arranged government trips around opportunities to patronize prostitutes, allegedly. Even if the acts themselves were as consenting-adults as could be, he sounds like a bad choice to manage, well, anybody.

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Ah, yep, that there matters

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 33 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

It's a concern because government officials should assume every foreign sex worker they run into may be a honeypot.

In addition to the human trafficking concerns brought up elsewhere

[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 3 points 15 hours ago

It’s a concern cause someone that is meant to be an upstanding citizen is using women that are/have suffered numerous forms of abuse. Fuck everything else.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 16 points 18 hours ago

Illegal sex work is the result of human trafficking. And immigration laws facilitate human traffickers.

What you've got is a man reaping the fruits of his labor. He harasses and tortures refugees so that they have nowhere to run. Then he visits the places they're forced to work and generously tips the pimps who do the local policing of young women.

[–] Bell@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The swamp appears to be still undrained

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 1 points 18 hours ago

Actually he has apparently been drained professionally, multiple times

[–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 10 points 18 hours ago

Uhm, hello, hi - I'd like ah... the Epstein Files, with uh.. ohm... a side of fucking duh.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Sorry China, America's leaders are gonna have to take the winnie the pooh nickname, what with how committed they are to getting stuck in a honeypot

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago

Nothing beats the hypocrisy of working to keep something out, which is also where I want to put something in. But not here.

[–] TheNeonGreek@piefed.social 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Trump haters get mad that SW is frowned on with loud conservatives, but then when someone engages in SW who works for/supports Trump, then it’s not acceptable. Shameful.

[–] TheNeonGreek@piefed.social 0 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Also, if the guy travels to where SW is allowed and it’s not with children, what’s the issue?

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 13 hours ago

It's only an issue if he's embarrassed enough that it could be used as leverage against him. Honeypots are not an uncommon method of extortion.

Him being a high ranking government official is what makes it a problem.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

It depends on exactly where he's going. Somewhere with strict controls and protections for the workers is no problem.

Somewhere with no controls or protections is a problem.