this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
157 points (97.6% liked)

Comic Strips

23030 readers
3564 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As the title.

Should there be a new rule added where intentional removal of credits and watermarks from other peoples works be deleted?

Only thing i can think against it is if the original artist isn't known. Usually someone in the comments finds it though

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] arin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 hour ago

Imo anyone caught removing credits should get banned

[–] AcesFullOfKings@feddit.uk 31 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

This community is effectively unmoderated. There's a single mod who is no longer active. So good luck asking for changes lol

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

He was active a few weeks ago. Maybe he is on vacation or something. Relax.

[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

My Cincinnati instance has like 5 mods and maybe 4 active users

[–] JetpackJackson@feddit.org 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Is there another community that is moderated? I would step up but I'm definitely not the person to ask

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 56 points 6 hours ago (2 children)
[–] TheV2@programming.dev 1 points 26 minutes ago

Yikes! I caught myself making the assumption that this was an "official" mod's post in response to the existing discussion...

[–] Lemvi@lemmy.sdf.org 46 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

and OP didn't credit it 👀

[–] notabot@piefed.social 10 points 3 hours ago

This has got to be peak irony.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yes. Unfortunately, proving intentionality in smaller cases than beep may be difficult. But it's useful as something to lean back on when it's obvious/egregious like their case.

First step would be enforcing the existing rules lime two posts per day per user, imo.

[–] SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 2 points 43 minutes ago

Just say that if it doesn’t have a watermark the poster has to provide a link to the original.

[–] viral.vegabond@piefed.social 25 points 6 hours ago

Yes, absolutely.

[–] c0dezer0@programming.dev 3 points 4 hours ago

You should look up the credit first. Has the credit similiar works? Then leave the credit untouched.

If there are no results, then someone else might be trying to "steal" the works and want to sell as their own.

Only in verified cases you should remove the incorrect credits and add the correct ones.

[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 7 points 5 hours ago

I think that deliberately removing credits should be against the rules but if they try to link back to the artist to give attribution in the event that the comic has already had attribution removed I would be okay with that so long as the rest of the work is intact. The individual who's been shown to be using AI to remove watermarks and artist signatures really ought to receive a suspension or something both for their ridiculous post rate (far exceeding the new rule about 2 posts per day), and also because they admit to removing attibution on purpose.