this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
38 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

83251 readers
3574 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
38
Quantum computers need vastly fewer resources than thought to break vital encryption (arstechnica.com)
submitted 3 hours ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/44276187

No, the sky isn't falling, but Q Day is coming, and it won't be as expensive as thought.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah as soon as someone fixes the instability of quantum computing to the point u can get enough qbits. This story has been going on for 30 years now. But just to be safe its nice to see places slowly moving to post quantum encryption a lot of things have already made the leap

[โ€“] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

The difference is that 10 years ago you needed billions of stable qubits, now you need 10k stable qubits.

And 10 years ago you had one or two stable qubits in the lab, now you have thousands.