this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
20 points (77.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

47421 readers
1321 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago

First. Because the government serves more than just you. So your priorities don't always align with the needs of the entire populace. There are lots of things that need to be funded, but you don't even know about.

Second, you can to a certain degree. Most charitable contributions are tax deductable. Meaning you can lower your tax burden by selectively funding what you want.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 hours ago

You vote for that by choosing the political team with the spending policy that best represents you. But it's a bundle and not spending decisions a la carte.

[–] Infrapink@thebrainbin.org 3 points 10 hours ago

Some disaster relief charities used to let people decide how their donations would be spent. Donors overwhelmingly voted for rebuilding houses, because everybody needs a house, and replacing someone's house is nice and feels good.

The charities ended up with way too much money earmarked for housing, which they were legally required to spend on new houses. That excess money could have been spent on boring things like sewage, but they were legally barred from doing so. The result was a lot of people with unnecessarily big, fancy homes with no working toilets or running water.

The charities quickly dropped this practice, because donors directed the money to what felt right instead of to where it was actually needed or would do the most good. And that's why we don't run the country that way.

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago

You're asking for direct democracy.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 20 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Let me ask you this.

What do you know about building roads? Running schools? Setting up a lab to do cancer research? Keeping a navy afloat?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

I didn't know how to read or write when I was born, but I adapted! I'm sure it would be fiiiiiiine!

Now, where should we build this cancer research facility? Oh, how about inbetween the marlborrow plant, and the burning tire yard? Fits perfectly!

And you don't HAVE to keep a navy afloat. They're on boats! They float on their own! Duh!!!

[–] Patnou@lemmy.world -2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Building roads would keep, basically we need to scrap our high school, don't know why we would need a navy since we are a land lock state.. and on cancer research that should be my choice because i would like more given to it.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 15 hours ago

Way to completely miss the point.

People go to school for years to do these jobs. You don't know better than them.

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 15 points 18 hours ago

In a word: no. That's not how a representative democracy works.

Name a public service you cannot live without. I'm going to say the ambulance service. So when I crash my Ferrari into a concrete pillar, they take me to the hospital and I survive. It would be a shame if the service had been closed due to a lack of funding. All because a group of entitled, predominantly male libertarians had run a campaign to withhold tax money for this supposedly useless service based on the fact that they never needed an ambulance in their life.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 14 points 19 hours ago

You voted for someone to represent you. That person then hires a team of people to assist them in making decisions about complicated things, such as the education system, the transportation system, sewage system, finances for all of those plus a hundred other things that no one person on the planet can know at once.

Then that person makes a decision in they believe to be in your best interest.

If you don't agree with that person's decisions then you can cast a vote for somebody else to replace them.

[–] mlc894@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

I wouldn’t want to have to take time to review budget proposals for my municipality, province, and country every day after I get off work. We have people for that.

[–] zxqwas@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's expensive to have elections.

You can also not choose where your money goes to. If I choose all my money goes to schools, am I still allowed to use the road? How about choosing everything except street lights and promising to not go out after sunset?

Pick the politician that says they will fight for the proirities you prefer the most. They may not get their way but there are other people in the (country/region/town) with other preferences than you and you still get to use the roads, schools, streetlamps and whatnot.

[–] Patnou@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Now you lemmies with the roads and stuff reminds me of contract theory from the 5th grade.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 4 points 15 hours ago

You can choose where your money is spent: it's called elections.

For instance, vote for orange pedophiles and your money is siphoned off and given to billionaires, Gestapo-like paramilitaries, middle-east forever-wars, fuck-flights and Barbie advertisements for the DHS Secy, and personal jet-setting for the FBI Director.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 8 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Most bonds or tax increases I vote on say what they are for, and the money has to be spent that way. I can't decide the specifics, but I can vote yes or no on road maintenance, or school funding, or whatever.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 15 hours ago

Most people here won't even know what you mean when you say "bonds" in this context.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

I’m quite cynical about it. No matter what is short money, the funding is always for education or fire fighting. It seems more likely they always shuffle around the budget so the shortfall always end up where we’ll vote for it