this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
106 points (97.3% liked)

politics

29165 readers
2428 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The state and more than 20 others restrict therapists from trying to change the gender identity or sexual orientation of L.G.B.T.Q. clients under the age of 18.

Needless to say, this will seriously scar a whole lot of kids whose homophobic parents force them through this

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 1 points 31 minutes ago

I can see the regime requiring conversion for any LGBTQ people trying to get Medicare.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

Colorado just needs to take a page from the Texas playbook and pass laws creating civil liability for organizations performing this so-called 'therapy' where any victim can sue for damages at any time afterwards, even decades later. Make it financially unfeasible to engage in this practice since you can't make it illegal.

[–] Martyy@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Wow, legalising torture of children. Out of words

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I hope all 8 die of natural, but divinely inspired causes. They legalized the torture of children. Child abuse is not protected speech

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 37 minutes ago

I vote for centipedes chewing into one ear and out the other.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Time to start setting up straight conversion camps. Give these fucking bastards a taste of their own medicine.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago

Back in the day it was considered completely normal and appropriate for a father to take a young man to a brothel for his first time.

And no, I'm not going to provide a link.

[–] homes@piefed.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Side benefit: this also means that it is my first amendment right to create “conversion camps“ to deprogram religious zealots

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

That’s right, the ruling goes both ways, that’s why it was 8-1 and not just a party line split

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago

Looks like we'll just have to prosecute them for regular child abuse 🤷

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

So in academic psychology, it's well known that

  1. Homosexuality is not a disorder

  2. Gender dysphoria is a cultural disorder (meaning it's not a mental problem but a problem created by society by stigmatizing a group of people, like how racism makes black people more anxious and prone to depression).

  3. Conversion therapy is pseudoscience. Literally zero credible research supporting it and plenty of credible research showing it doesn't work.

  4. People, especially children and teens forced to have this therapy have high rates of suicide and PTSD.

  5. The only , and I mean ONLY people who perform this type of therapy are fake therapist. They are not people with PhDs or psyDs. They are church members.

Licensed educated psychologist know the facts I listed. They would never do the therapy because of those reasons or fear of losing license or being sued to oblivion.

Many states allow anyone to call themselves a therapist. You can be a therapist of anything. You can make up a title. It just can't say "psychologist". And you can charge people money for bunk made up therapies.

For instance new age therapies are all over.

If a state wants to ban these and can't outright ban them, then make it so only a licensed PhD or psyD from an accredited university with 50hrs of supervised conversion training by a PsyD or PhD who already has license for this therapy, can perform said therapy.

It won't be possible for anyone to meet those qualifications that wants to do the therapy.

[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

This lawsuit was brought by a licensed psychotherapist who also happens to be a Christian. There are already restrictions on who can practice psychotherapy. These aren’t some unlicensed people. These are the people you are talking about, with a graduate school education and a licensing process and everything.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Probably someone with a masters in social work. Counselor.

I'll look into this more.

PhDs are a bit harder to get compared to masters or PsyD. PsyDs are easier as it's pay-to-get type of degree whereas a PhD is more competitive and requires research experience and a dissertation. So you have to be a research scientist to get a PhD. Not true for PsyD. Some of those people barely understand how to understand research papers or stats. They don't get training in methods or statistics so they don't know how to understand research. Nor understand human biased and why we must use scientific method because we can't trust our own opinion.

There are Christian colleges and universities but they often do not have accredited psychology degrees. They have to have their curriculum be at certain standards set by the american psychology association (apa) to qualify.

However. You can still get a counseling license even if the university you attended is not apa accredited.

Counseling licenses are given by the state.

I think this should not be allowed. But it is.

Yeah there are way too many unqualified mental health practitioners out there.

There is research on outcomes of patients based on the education type and level of therapist.

Those with masters have poorest outcomes and psyD follow. Both of these often do not use "evidence based therapies" but make up their own approaches based on their own beliefs.

As you can imagine that's not great.

Since PhD psychologist are trained scientist, it's probably not surprising they rely more on evidence based approaches.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you want to attend “conversion therapy” as an adult, by all means do so as it is your right to control your own body and mind. Furthermore, parents have the right to raise their children as they see fit, and should have wide latitude in deciding the best way to do that.

However, forcing minors into these “programs” commonly amounts to child abuse and in some cases, torture. On top of being exploitatively expensive, they also don’t work. They need to be abolished.

How Gay Conversion Therapy Camps Actually Work | Authorized Account | Insider

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

If you want to attend “conversion therapy” as an adult, by all means do so as it is your right to control your own body and mind.

Washington, D.C. banned "conversion therapy" targeting adults too, and they were correct to.

"Conversion therapy" isn't therapy and doesn't work, and you shouldn't be allowed to run a business – let alone a practice – based on fraud. Moreover, not everyone suddenly stops being vulnerable when they turn 18. Adults are definitely still heavily pressured into attendance in states where it's legal for adults.

There should be no "just for adults, as a treat" pussyfooting around this. It's fraudulent, demonstrably harmful, and perpetrated by bigots who want nothing less than to exterminate the identities of all LGBTQ+ people. Leaving the fascists alone has never worked.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Great points, totally agreed.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

Yeah it's medical malpractice plain and simple.

[–] panthera_@lemmy.today 7 points 21 hours ago

Conversion therapy is not going to work because the cause of sexual orientation is probably biological. From https://scienceinsights.org/is-being-gay-genetic-what-science-actually-says/

Sexual orientation is a complex trait resulting from an intricate interplay of influences, not a single cause. Current scientific consensus points to a combination of genetic, hormonal, and developmental factors interacting during an individual’s formation. It is likely shaped by multiple biological predispositions that manifest during development.

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago

Torture. Torture Torture Torture.

Don't validate it. Ever.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago

Torturing gay kids is such a cool and rational thing to do. Jesus would 100% approve, he loved that shit

[–] JaymesRS@piefed.world 9 points 1 day ago

While this isn’t great, it’s only applicable to talk therapy which I don’t think you can have a significant impact on without running into free speech issues which was the ruling. Any “physical” domain-type therapy is not impacted by this ruling which the headline doesn’t make clear*.

*- probably on purpose because Fuck the NYT.

This is why freedom of religion was a mistake and the abrahamic religions should be made illegal for the poison they’ve spread throughout the world. A parent that would rather have a dead child than a gay or trans child should be made into compost