this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
491 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

83251 readers
4192 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BehindetheClouds@reddthat.com 10 points 14 hours ago

People need to read.

"For Europe, the negotiations are significant because they sit at the intersection of EU-level authority over data protection and border policy and member states’ control over their own national biometric databases.

After internal debate, the EU moved in 2024 and 2025 toward a collective approach, with the Council authorizing negotiation of an EU-level framework agreement in December 2025.

That framework would establish the legal conditions for transfers to DHS, while individual member states would later conclude implementing arrangements identifying the databases involved and setting the operational terms.

The negotiations are also exposing the main fault lines that could determine whether a final deal is possible.

European officials want strict limits on bulk or routine data collection, meaningful human oversight of decisions with adverse effects, restrictions on the handling of sensitive personal data, tight controls on onward transfers to third countries, and some form of effective remedy for individuals whose data is misused.

The EU also wants reciprocity, meaning member states’ authorities would be able to query corresponding U.S. databases rather than simply supplying data to Washington.

Those demands may prove difficult to reconcile with DHS’s broader vision for routine biometric screening tied to border encounters and related immigration or law enforcement matters.

Tensions also remain over how long transferred data could be retained, whether the agreement would cover only targeted border checks or something closer to systematic screening, and what kind of legal redress Europeans could realistically obtain under U.S. law.

Even so, both sides appear motivated by the same broad objective of tighter border control, which has made this one of the more consequential transatlantic data negotiations now underway.

If concluded, the agreement would mark a major expansion of U.S.-EU cooperation on biometric information sharing and could become a model for future border security arrangements.

But it will also test whether Washington and Brussels can strike a deal that satisfies Europe’s legal standards on privacy and proportionality while still delivering the operational access DHS wants."

Nothing has been signed.

[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 28 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Why? What could the EU gain by giving personal data of its citizens to a country that illegally eavesdrops on them?

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 7 points 17 hours ago

Not sure if your serious or joking about what you know but countries have laws about spying on their own people but not as much non citizens and foreign locations. They don't have laws about not sharing information about their citizens from a foreign government. So these kind of things allow them to bypass their internal privacy laws.

[–] Antaeus@lemmy.world 24 points 18 hours ago

Strange with how hostile the US has been lately. Is this a gift to the facists?

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 69 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

... Why?!?

Why would you do such a ridiculously stupid thing?

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 20 points 21 hours ago

Because their politicians are playing their people, it's the same across the west, the oligarchy controls all main parties, and the far right sponsored by malign foreign influence, ahem, is the only one running as reform, dooming us all to them winning eventually, and putting a fix in.

But that's another story. They are surrendering us to tech, and to fascism, because they aren't on our side. We are collectively too stupid to realize it. Because they think they will benefit, and we have nothing but nihilists in charge.

[–] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

My guess is easier visas? Although some already have ESTA/visa exemptions

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Because even EU politicians are afraid of the people

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 18 hours ago

If they were they wouldn't be doing this, this sounds like it will anger many EU citizens

[–] redsand -2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The Rothschilds are largely French. The EU is also entagled in the surveillance state the Epstein class is building

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Bro, are not the rothschilds not the main drivers at this point in time? Why would you mention them in particular? Are they even in the Epstein files that we know about? I imagine they aren't because they are likely tight with Israel and Epstein was an Israeli honeypot op.

Pieces of shit I don't doubt, but are they the driving force here? Like did you just pick up an early 20th century history book and run with that?

[–] redsand 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Oh yes, they're in there a lot. Like a lot a lot. Like Epstein introduced himself as their money manager. One of those few emails that can only really be interpreted as hunting humans for sport was to or from a Rothschild I forget which. Might have been a spouse and it was both sides.

You've some reading to do. Did you see the Ghislaine Maxwell invite to be on the 9/11 shadow commission? Yes, Seriously.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 19 hours ago

I will check it out thanks, that great game thing rings a bell actually I forgot about their mention in that.

[–] mrnobody@reddthat.com 185 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How is this not a violation of GDPR?! "Homeland Security" doesn't need the data, this is thousands of people for under 5 possible threats at most... this is fucking stupid! The game of bribery and backdoor deals of monetizing data keeps spreading, huh?

The only thing that makes the EU bureaucracy seem like it's functional are competing national interests. When all nations are being targeted by foreign automated propaganda through their social networks to promote shifts in their governments to allow this sort of bull, it doesn't even matter that the US is directly issuing threats against the EU, only just what corrupt long time career politicians can get out of it.

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Government is excluded from meeting GDPR requirements. ☺️

[–] Tim_Bisley@piefed.social 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well that's a real kick in the nuts.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Surveillance capitalism will continue the fascist takeover until the whole planet is a totalitarian company town and we are all slaves to big brother; paying a daily subscription to breathe.

I'm not even joking.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago

paying a daily subscription to breathe.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 13 hours ago

So you’re saying we’ll live in locations owned by the state, paying money issued by the state, and if we fail to pay armed thugs will lock us up?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I mean we were saying this in the early 90s too but. Yeah.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago

Yes I called it too.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

Uh? It’s a bit less generic than that… some activities of governments are excluded from the scope but not all data processing from government agencies are.

For example this particular personal data processing likely fits under the prevention of criminal offences and threats to public security and is highly unfortunate but let’s keep shit factual.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Because our governments treat fascists in good faith, foreign or domestic.

[–] mthomson@forum.macaque.social 8 points 16 hours ago

WTF?! I wouldn't trust the US to look after my lunch currently, let alone personal biometric data. You know this will wind up in Palantir's grubby hands, with declared intentions to use it for evil. This absolutely should NOT happen.

[–] Sonicdemon86@lemmy.world 26 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Come on French, where's the riots in the streets? Do you really want the USA deciding which memes will get you put into the memes camps?

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 4 points 19 hours ago

One calls it a "meme camp", others call it a "concentration camp". Choose wisely!

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 25 points 21 hours ago

Europeans who recently have been criticizing US citizens for how they voted: "Et tu de baddie?"

[–] DoubleDongle@lemmy.world 88 points 1 day ago

What the fuck

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 1 day ago

Just vassal states things.

Act tough on press, but gargle US balls behind doors.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 53 points 1 day ago

Ugh... Time and time again we are shown that US corporate shareholder needs dictate massive invasion of privacy and global over reach. Well this won't stand in Europe! Let's see what the EU says about this... Oh. Oh wait 😲.

[–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

What in the actual fuck?!

[–] webkitten@piefed.social 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This is why my android sticks with PINs or Patterns. Never biometrics.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 18 hours ago

This is also why you give your biometrics to governments, they already have it

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Hey Euros! Don’t visit America or you will get sent to ICE gulag if you made an off hand internet comment about Trump 8 years ago describing that his dick is small.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 3 points 19 hours ago

And what happens if you only mentioned its mushroom shape, without mentioning his small hands?

Asking for a friend btw!!

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago

which they probably already have. Look at that list, and that's only France ☞ https://bonjourlafuite.eu.org/

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fuck! God!! No!!! Please!!!! 😡

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Trumpers will think it is great because they think nothing he does applies to them.