this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
620 points (99.7% liked)

politics

29165 readers
3059 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] the_armchair_potato@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago

Who would fire him? Trumps entire administration are the most corrupt officials to ever take office. Insider trading is the least of their many criminal offenses. The entire lot should be thrown in prison!!

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

Someone please post the reminder about the voting

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 6 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

not at all corrupt. Nothing this regime does is corrupt, because it's only corrupt if you get charged and convicted for it, which I'm sure you can all imagine is never going to happen. Not while daddy dumpy is in power, and certainly not after, because the democrats are spineless fucking dipshits. (ugh. Fuck this idiot.)

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

not at all corrupt.

Legally, maybe. Morally or ethically corrupt? Absolutely.

[–] jagermo@feddit.org 164 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah it's probably not going to happen until after the Republicans are out of office and someone can fix the DOJ.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 29 points 1 day ago

Republicans being held responsible and suffering consequences after leaving office? That's a funny joke, but I've already heard it.

[–] e8CArkcAuLE@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

even if at some point the rule of law returns and they will prosecute, this unhinged piece of shit would rather murder-suicide his whole family than assume any responsibility and consequences

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

I'm cool with him pulling a Goebbels.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

Yeah the editor toned down the quote in the headline. The actual quote from the article was:

"Firing this drunk idiot is the bare minimum. @PeteHegseth should be prosecuted."

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Trump knows that when he orders the military to fire on American citizens, Hegseth will enthusiastically pull that trigger. He would launch a nuclear weapon if Trump wanted him to. That kind of unquestioning psychopathic loyalty is incredibly valuable.

Hegseth isn't going anywhere, he's one of Trump's core players, like Bondi or PeeWee Himmler.

[–] S4m_S3p1l 2 points 13 hours ago

You're absolutely right, he's literally just their trigger happy hype man. He's there to act as a motivational figurehead who's willing to accept and promote whatever results in the most military action being taken at Trump's request. Also "trigger happy hype man" - that would actually be a cool name for a song or album come to think of it....

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Even if that weren't true, the idea that this type of open corruption is grounds for firing in a Trump admin is laughable. Trump himself is far more corrupt, and hegseth being corrupt just goes further to ensure his loyalty. He can always have Bondi do a selective prosecution of this should he step out of line.

It's basically kompromat that only Trump (through control of the DOJ through Bondi) can use.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Don't forget Bondi wasn't even their first choice. Bondi is just who they used because they couldn't get Matt Gaetz the position. Someone he could blackmail into doing anything because they already have the evidence that he trafficked and raped a minor. Gaetz assistant pled guilty and is in prison with a shortened sentence (14 years) with the agreement he would testify against Gaetz. Both Florida and the U.S. put the files in a drawer and essentially labeled it blackmail and let him walk free until they need to use it against him. He wasn't found not guilty, wasn't even tried, they just put them in a corner and said... Maybe later.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 23 hours ago

That is an entirely accurate assessment of the situation, with one small clarification:

Joel Greenberg wasn't his assistant, he could be better described as a wingman/ concierge/ pimp, sort of a Florida Trailer Trash analogy to Epstein/Trump.

Greenberg was the Seminole County Tax Collector, an elected position, that oversees tax collections, obviously, but also the DMV, and Elections. So it's a powerful position, with a lot of room for corruption.

One of the things that they did was take underage girls into the DMV after hours, and let them root through barrels of old licenses, looking for ones that resembled themselves close enough that they could use them as fake IDs.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 101 points 1 day ago (1 children)

reached a new "height of criminality."

This is base level of criminality now.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah this isn't even nearly as many felonies as Trump had prior to being elected.

[–] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, Trump has been using his position in office to enrich himself in both terms…. What are they gonna do to Hegseth?

[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Depends on whether daddy granted his permission.

[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

or gets his cut of the robbery

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hegseth should serve life in prison.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hegseth should serve life in a drag show?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Bryon Noem can give him some tips.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

He'll enjoy that too much. Drag queens are hilarious.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

He’ll enjoy that too much.

Do you not know who Pete Hegseth is?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

"Under fire"? Man that sounds serious. What are they actually firing at him, though? Like how is he being penalized by being "under fire"? What does that mean?

[–] slemptastrophe@piefed.social 12 points 1 day ago

It's like when a corporation gets "SLAMMED" for some anti-social act, or policy. It means theyvare being criticized for it, but the accountability ends there.

It doesn’t mean anything. These headlines might as well read, “quell your rage, educated masses: the bad people are finally getting the negative attention they deserve, so put down your pitchforks…”

It’s a slow drip of hope that consequences are just around the corner. It keeps uprisings at bay. Until decades later people realize, “wait a minute… how’s this guy running for President? Wasn’t he ‘under fire’ for some shit not long ago?”

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

The only fire Hegseth understands is fireball.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

'Fire this idiot'

Followed immediately by "arrest this criminal".

[–] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Out of a cannon into the sun

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That requires more energy than shooting him out of the solar system.
I'm all for energy efficiency!
Nice side effect: he has more time to contemplate the reason behind his long journey.

[–] CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Alternatively, launch toward the sun, include a solar power tracker, and track and follow the trajectory for science/physics class work!

Based on trumps speed and position today, calculate where his bloated corpse will be in 9 hours, the length of a workday, which is something he never personally experienced, but tried to make worse for the average person.

Double whammy of learning about history and science!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What about the peanuts farm?

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm always so angry when this gets brought up. He loved that fucking peanut farm and he gave it up! That's how much he cared about the American people. We didn't deserve him.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

Sorry, AND I don't even know which US president it was 😁

I feel guilty, get better soon Adolf!

[–] Damage@feddit.it 6 points 1 day ago

So this is the limit? Money? Of course.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Someone more knowledgeable clarify this to me ?

"Pete Hegseth tried to make a LOSING insider trade on his advance knowledge of Trump's Iran war plans, which he advised to start," Grant Stern, managing editor of Occupy Democrats, posted on X. "This is the height of criminality and incompetence."

How was the trade losing ? whatever stock it was went down ? was it something akin to weapons manufacturing ? and if I understand correctly, it was expected to go up because of their involvement in the "war effort" ?

[–] Shirasho@lemmings.world 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You can gamble on whether a stock price will rise or fall. When going to war, stock prices for war companies rise because they are expected to get a lot of business, but if that call to war is suddenly canceled, then the stock price for that company decreases.

If he made a losing bet, one of two things happened:

  1. The value of the stock was going to drop way below the value it started at, so he would earn a large payout on that gamble.

  2. He was funneling large amounts of money to other insider traders.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are ways to make money when stocks go up, of course, but there are also ways to make money when stocks go down. We don't know the details, but the bottom line is that he bet one way, and the market went the other.

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 2 points 1 day ago

What a dunce

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Don't have to be a good criminal to do crime! Dude's an amateur at insider-trading!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 2 points 1 day ago

The tweet is linked, but doesn't give any details. So we don't know - and it might well not be true. What can be asserted without proof, can be rejected without proof.

load more comments
view more: next ›