this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
686 points (99.6% liked)

politics

29165 readers
3044 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://yall.theatl.social/post/9683582

From the Atlanta Tribune:

Previously Unseen Docs Reveal That Susie Wiles Witnessed Trump Showing a Classified Map to Unnamed Plane Passengers, and President Took Sensitive Document Accessible to Only Six People in the U.S. Government Washington, D.C. (March 25, 2026)—Rep. Jamie Raskin, Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee, sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi demanding urgent […]The post New documents reveal Trump stole classified documents to advance his business interests appeared first on Atlanta Tribune.

#Atlanta #AtlantaTribune #theATLBot

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 5 points 24 minutes ago

Imagine a country where a child rapist, conman and failed businessman is elected president, and then convicted of stealing classified documents, among other crimes... only to be elected again!

Yeah, that's the world's leading superpower... How did you know?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, he was going to sell them to the highest bidder, for money. That's Donald Trump's only business - making money, any way possible, including Treason.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 6 points 2 hours ago

Maybe this could finally help some people learn how sick you must be to be a billionaire, and how bad of an idea it is to give even more power to such people.

Probably not. But maybe!

[–] metermatic26@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Captain Obvious, reporting for duty, sir!

[–] ChetManly@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago

When you're famous they let you grab em by the classification banner

[–] Heikki2@lemmy.world 37 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Who would have thought a 34 time felon for fraud, sexuual assaulter found civilly liable, adulter, best friends with the world's most famous pedofile whom described Trump as "The worst person he has ever known", guy willing to say anything to get elected like "I will bring gas down" and "I will not start new wars, she will" could not be trusted with state secrets.

Shock I tell you, I am shocked.

I other news water is wet and the DOW is still above 45k

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I other news water is wet

no it isn't. water makes stuff wet

[–] BootyBuccaneer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

How do we know water isn't making itself wet? 🤔🧐 🔬 🦠

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Fuck. I had to get home before staring at my hands dude

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

this guy again!!! i knew someone would say this.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

I"M HERE FOR AN ARGUMENT i got some real "my cat just sunk her claws into my boob to show affection" energy

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago

This asshole, along with all of his family, should be frog-marched straight into prison.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 7 points 19 hours ago

New documents re-confirm what previous investigations had already been aware of.

And still, no consequences are forthcoming.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

In other surprising news, the sun is a star.

[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

No, dummy. The sun IS the moon. It just puts its fire out in the ocean every evening.

I thought I was getting away from misinformed slander like this when I left Reddit.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 7 points 20 hours ago

Oh how singularly unshocking.

[–] wavebeam@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

I heard Hunter Biden had Clinton emails on his laptop.

That's why the frogs are gay.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 19 hours ago

You're allowed to do this now. it's perfectly legal

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 9 points 23 hours ago

And nothing is done about it. Criminal keeps doing criminal shit without a single consequence.

[–] BootyBuccaneer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

How the fuck is this not treason?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

The usual answer is that it’s only treason in times of war, but since the majority of voters are racist shitbags here we are. Jack Smith would have moved forward under Harris but I’m reliably informed she loved the genocide in a way that made trump preferable. For his genocide lovin’. So.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

Lock him up.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

:shocked pikachu face:

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Impeach. Remove. If not, revolution. Not that I advocate for a revolution happening.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Imagine if a Democrat did this

[–] tektite@slrpnk.net 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Surely this can't possibly be worse than wearing a tan suit or riding a bicycle?

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't forget Dijon mustard

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 1 points 3 hours ago

Or baggy pants because of weight loss

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

This is actually a bigger deal than just a "No shit, Sherlock," only not in the direction of exposing what Trump did. We ALL fucking know he hoovered up whatever he thought he could sell on the international elite markets. That's no surprise; that's not even news.

But for those of us who waited all last year for Special Counsel Jack Smith's report to be released publicly, only to see it suppressed by Trump's favorite judge in Florida, Aileen Cannon, this is a big deal. It's sort of an Epstein Files, Part Duh.

Special Counsel Jack Smith is the guy who, along with a number of career (read: not partisan aligned) prosecutors, assembled two cases against Trump: the 2020 election interference, and the documents handling. The documents case is the one Aileen Cannon delayed until she could throw it out, and then when the report was due to be released, as they almost all are, she ordered that suppressed as well, along with all the evidence assembled backing it.

This gag order imposed on Jack Smith, specifically, is so unusually extreme and all-encompassing that Smith was legally barred from testifying to Congress on his own report's specific contents when subpoenaed to appear in a deposition by the House Judiciary Committee.

But with the same nimble political dexterity they have handled the Epstein files, Trump and his butt sniffers on the House Judiciary Committee have been trying like hell to smear Jack Smith: the report is apparently so incendiary they all live in fear of it coming out, so they have been working overtime to get ahead of the inevitable leak or release by using it to disparage Jack Smith and by extension his evidence.

In pursuit of this goal of somehow maligning Jack Smith, the House Judiciary Committee has been using that report like a menu to request materials about the original case from the DoJ. And they've been getting them -- including materials that either include or make detailed mention of the specific information that Judge Cannon specifically embargoed in her order suppressing Smith's report and any discussion of it, including Smith's Congressional testimony:

This particular production contained a memorandum detailing non-public information about the classified documents Trump stole when leaving office. The newly produced materials offer a startling view of evidence gathered by Special Counsel Jack Smith during his investigations into the criminal activity of President Trump, even as DOJ continues to suppress Volume II of his final report.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, the ranking (non-butt-sniffing) member of the House Judiciary Committee, saw this for what it is and fired off a letter to Pam Bondi, detailing what was obviously being hidden and demanding answers, specifically, "on who accessed the materials, what they contained, and whether any foreign actors were able to access or exploit the information. He also called for the release of all remaining investigative files, including the full, unredacted Special Counsel report."

This is also directly relevant to the war in Iran:

“If this map is related to our military posture in the Middle East, and it was in fact shown to any foreign official, Saudi or otherwise, that would amount to an unforgiveable betrayal of our men and women in uniform who are currently valiantly fighting in President Trump’s disastrous war against Iran,” wrote Ranking Member Raskin.

This is the upshot (emphasis mine):

DOJ’s hypocrisy in gagging Jack Smith is underscored by this latest disclosure. Special Counsel Smith remains barred from sharing information with Congress under a sweeping gag order imposed by Justice Cannon, at the request of Donald Trump, and enforced by DOJ. At the same time, DOJ has produced cherry-picked documents to aid Chairman Jordan’s vindictive campaign against Special Counsel Smith and his team, including some documents that appear to violate Judge Cannon’s order. DOJ appears to view the judicial order as rules for thee—Jack Smith—but not for me. However, it appears that the evidence against Donald Trump collected by Jack Smith and memorialized in his records is so damning, that even DOJ’s carefully curated production cannot fully excise findings that the President sold out national security to advance his own business interests.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago (9 children)

He rapes kids and everybody knows it, idk how any document could ever matter at this point

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't believe in giving that asshole a pass on ANYTHING, and I would suggest the same strategy to you, especially since what they believe he passed along was related to current US troop safety in the region.

I don't believe in the war, but I also don't believe in cannon fodder. It's not Barron who's going to bleed for this.

I say hold that piece of shit responsible for ALL of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] zd9@lemmy.world 80 points 1 day ago (9 children)

You know they used to hang people for treason and sedition

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] cyrano@piefed.social 82 points 1 day ago

⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡏⠉⠛⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠛⠉⠁⠀⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⠿⠿⠿⠻⠿⠿⠟⠿⠛⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣸⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣄⠀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣴⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠠⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⠀⠀⢰⣹⡆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣭⣷⠀⠀⠀⠸⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠈⠉⠀⠀⠤⠄⠀⠀⠀⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢾⣿⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⡠⠤⢄⠀⠀⠀⠠⣿⣿⣷⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡀⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢄⠀⢀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠉⠁⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢹⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The thing that makes it harder to have hope for the future is that this is like the 147th story about this piece of shit, of just a similar magnitude (we're looking at thousands of fucked stories if we count all of them). Trump is the thief of hope. I know that before Trump, I was a LOT more hopeful in general. We can talk all day about other presidents being fucked up and they are. But it totally changes the psychology of millions/billions when corruption like this is allowed to thrive in the open. The phrase "the death of truth" has been used and it's real. Before Trump, there was a line somewhere that a politician could cross which would lose them support. Honestly it's hard to believe that even a video of Trump raping a child would change the minds of at least a few million of these fucks. It's so disheartening.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Trump might not face consequences, but America will. The world can see that the post-WWII status quo of American hegemony needs to end and the fact that Trump has already torpedoed your position in international trade and is in the process of bleeding your military dry means that there's a clear path to bringing that about. Soon it won't matter what the American President does, at least not as far as most of the human race is concerned. That's something to be hopeful for.

It'll still matter to the people unfortunate enough to live within the United States' borders but, well, they voted for this.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I live in the US and I did not vote for this. You cannot blame me for the many other factors that led us here either. I've opposed the electoral college since 7th grade.

You're just hand waving away millions of other people as the domestic victims as if their votes against this also did not matter. You could make an intellectual argument that some of those who did vote for this don't deserve the future they're going to get, but emotionally I will always blame them.

I think you're also ignoring that America affects the rest of the world as much as it does. Even if that decreases by 80%, it still won't be nothing.

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 2 points 19 hours ago

Thief of hope; does that make him the commander in thief?

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

So he broke the law. Call the police, and press charges.

[–] wizblizz@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh come on, would a 34 time convicted felon lie, cheat and steal?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Barbuzie@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago

No shit Sherlock, who would have thought?

load more comments
view more: next ›