this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
1206 points (98.8% liked)

Comic Strips

23030 readers
4526 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

that's it. nothing more to really add to it. it's quite simple.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

We need an active mod in this community. Any suggestions? I have no experience.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

be fair. treat everyone equally. be kind, try not to get your feelings hurt even when people intentionally try to hurt yours. have easy to understand, clear, easily accessible rules. apply them even-handedly, even to yourself. it's best if there isn't some huge list of rules but like, people will push boundaries. your job is to enforce the will of the community, not your will, so poll the community to get their opinions.

this isn't the mods' petty fiefdom, it's all of our petty fiefdom. it's the posters and commenters that make the community what it is. a lot of mods forget that.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 318 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] FateOfTheCrow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 104 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 60 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] unit327@lemmy.zip 68 points 2 days ago (2 children)

MOTION TO MAKE A RULE THAT USING ALL CAPS IS AGAINST THE RULES

[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 86 points 2 days ago (5 children)

The way to hell is paved with good intensions...

The current proposal is not specific enough: With your proposal every post effectively requires an artist signature. There will always be some valid reason why there is none. Also who should check/enforce this? The single non-existing mod? xD

Keep it simpler and make a rule that says: Content created by somebody else requires attribution.

Attribution could be an artist signature in the comic, the name of the artist in the description or a link to the original source in a comment.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago

If I were to indulge in pedantry, the rule would be against cropping signatures, not requiring they exist. If it's unsigned then there's nothing to crop. I like your phrasing much better though, require attribution if you have it.

[–] knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 days ago

This comment alone should qualify you to become the second non-existing mod

[–] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 10 points 2 days ago

Sensible. Updoots all the way

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

My good dude, hell has the good food, the good music, the good wine, even the good Nixon(below) (the evil one went to heaven, have you seen the kind of people that go there?).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 123 points 2 days ago (10 children)

A good number of strips will be pre-cropped, or the equivalent. So what you'd really want when the signature's missing is to have the poster do reverse-image as necessary so as to identify the creator, making sure to include that information.

There's also the fact that doubtless there will be posters ignoring such a rule / guideline, ideally necessitating mod intervention. Meanwhile, the one and only mod looks like they haven't been active in a month.

¯\(ツ)

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 104 points 2 days ago (4 children)

having a rule tells people "hey we want attribution in the strip so get those versions"

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Are there ways this could be implemented though that would not punish people who accidentally posted the wrong one though. You have a good idea, but we also have very few contributors on Lemmy and we don't want to discourage that either.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 77 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

i mean we don't have to make it a bannable offense, we just have to say "hey, go find the original if you can". it's a pretty relaxed community right?

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

sounds like the approach I'd appreciate.

Also, than you for the mod work.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

someone's gotta step up

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Unlike Reddit, it's possible to edit the link a post links to after the fact, so it's possible to swap in an uncropped link later instead of just removing the post.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RustyShackleford@piefed.social 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Here’s an idea: add easily accessible links so that even those less technologically inclined can easily reverse image search. Since many younger users are moving to Lemmy, they might not fully understand all the rules you’re trying to enforce.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This is A. Good. Point.

If i actually lose my mind and agree to mod this sub in a few months i'm saving this so i can come back to it, I have to look up how to reverse image search every damn time. And one of my first jobs was working IT building computers and programming bullshit dammit I'm not completely tech naive, just stuck in windows 7 because fuck you microsoft.

anyways, thank you Rusty, I am making you Honorary Something. Whatever it is, whenever we think of it, you are it. That was a great idea.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Images with the creator's name cropped shouldn't be shared anyway, plus they're usually deep-fried and look like a blurry mess. People should be looking for originals to replace the crappy quality ones.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 38 points 2 days ago

If there's no conveniently available version with the artist credit in the image, a link to the artist's page in the post body I think would suffice.

[–] Sc00ter@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You also need some way to validate that its not interface specific. The amount of threads that ive been in that have had people complaining that the artist name was cropped, but in my app (voyager) ive been able to see the whole image, is too damn high.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

On other hand there are those who say they intentionally removed them because they don't like them.

But either way if interface cutting it off would be easy to show for the mods or others I thread

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

seems like the answer in that situation would be to ban those posters.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 days ago

Exactly, but my guess is that poster is one of the main reasons for this rule change request

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

you can't second your own motion stop talking to yourself

[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

my only regret is that i have boneitis

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago

honestly this is mostly because i'm about to bike out and help my comic book buddy with his taxes. but c'mon people, be respectful to the artists.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 19 points 2 days ago (3 children)

yeah fair, unless if it's stonetoss

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)

I'm not a regular here, but this feels perfectly sensible

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't know if I get a vote here, but I am strongly in favour — especially as you've said that it's not necessarily going to be a bannable offence. I think that rules can serve as a valuable statement of intention — like virtue signalling, except without the negative connotations of that term

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I find that it's pretty rare anyone here would do it intentionally. Usually that comes from people just resharing something they found on Instagram or somewhere.

I agree people should try to find the original author and post the original in that case. But I think that should be called out instead.

Edit: This comment is redundant, but oh well

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›