this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
736 points (98.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

11217 readers
2119 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] charonn0@startrek.website 23 points 1 day ago

You should cut diagonally. If it makes a sandwich better, imagine what it can do for a novel.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

Just read books on your phone, or a tablet. You can carry an entire library with you.

[–] Naich@piefed.world 111 points 2 days ago

That psychopath needs reporting to the police.

[–] robyn@lemmy.org 3 points 1 day ago

This is the book version of ed gein

[–] Overspark@piefed.social 86 points 2 days ago (7 children)

That's just wrong. If you're worried about portability get an e-reader, don't butcher up works of art.

[–] Orygin@sh.itjust.works 110 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

I think most e-readers will stop working if you cut them in half to be more portable. Books still have the upper hand on this

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I mean, if you had like a hand bound copy or rare out of print book or something like that this sentiment makes sense, but if it's just some abundant mass produced edition, I'm not so sure. Surely the artistry there is in the words, which aren't damaged and exist in other copies anyway, rather than the cheap machine made physical medium.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Just get a freaking backpack.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I stopped getting upset about this sort of thing when I learned libraries destroy books as part of their normal operations.

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know, I'm a priest and I once sliced up a Bible for personal use.

Tthere was once a particular version of the Bible that I wanted, but the publisher only made a hard-backed version. I hate hard-back books (especially Bibles). So I bought it and immediately sliced the cover off and made a new one out of old church bulletins and duct tape.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

hip 90s youth pastor energy

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's a mass-produced book, and a paperback at that. You can certainly keep any such book in good condition to archive or re-read on your own terms. But that stack of acid-paper and cheap glue is going to eventually self-destruct. Unless it's a limited production run, in danger of getting burned, autographed, is an actual collectable, or something else that makes it distinct or valuable, I say: go for it.

Source: I own a stack of these from back in the day. Despite my best efforts to store them appropriately, they're all slowly rotting away. Some things just aren't meant to last.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

I have never been so offended by something so harmless in the greater scheme of things.

[–] WandowsVista@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (7 children)

this is so wrong.

you're supposed to cut them in half so you can fit each side in the pockets of your cargo shorts.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The LitBros will hunt this man for sport because of what he did to Infinite Jest.

Infinite Jest is best read with all the pages torn out and arranged something like this, CMV:

[–] username_1@programming.dev 33 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Deport him to... away. Far far away.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (12 children)

last year I've allowed myself to do marginalia, to allow me to write notes and whatever I want on the books I read while I read. it's inherently destructive, but it changes the whole experience. reading is no longer a passive activity but a conversation with the material. and I love it.

but felt guilty about doing irreversible changes to the book. then this shit shows up.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Damaskox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Feels like a quite awful thing to do 😅

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›