this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
427 points (99.1% liked)

politics

29165 readers
3044 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Isn't that about 1/3 of the country? Aren't these the same dipshits that worry about birth rates for some fucking reason?

load more comments (3 replies)

And then they expect us to want to fight to protect these people’s fFeEdoMs in wars to protect their pedophile daddy. Fuck off. You get what you fucking deserve.

[–] boeman@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

More like Dollar General David Hasselhoff.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Without the great, the value, or the Willem Dafoe

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean that's what a white supremacist would say after all.

White, White baby.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

After hearing the CPAC audience cheer for a Trump impeachment I'd be curious to hear their response to this.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

“I’m going to say something that’s going to make some people uncomfortable: The problem is, we call it Sharia [law], but the problem is actually Islam,” French said. “If they can infiltrate Texas and conquer Texas, then what’s going to happen? They’re going to be able to control the United States.”

[–] riskable@programming.dev 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Apparently he didn't get the memo that the fastest growing religion in the US is "no religion". This is also true for the 2nd generation of immigrants.

While American Muslims have higher retention rates, their kids are also becoming atheist (in the US) at a rapid pace.

In short, he's got nothing to worry about! What's going to happen? Easy: Religion will become a smaller and smaller factor over time no matter who we "let in" 😁👍

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago

Yeah but he's actually just worried about brown people existing.

load more comments (1 replies)

I fail to see the difference between the current Christian overlords in Texas and what they call Islam, they just want the authoritarianism to be white, they always want to fuck over women though

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›