this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
987 points (92.5% liked)

Political Memes

11499 readers
3293 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Those who take the responsibility of caring for society's newest members should be given more leeway/support in many areas, not just employment. I don't have kids (yet, God willing), I'm just not unempathetic/extremely self-centered/nihilistic. We do live in a society, after all.

[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

Based on the tone and language of the discussion, this is very USA things.

And for that I've a song.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago

This question is what you ask when you want to get your employees fighting against each other and not against the boss who is stealing all of their money.

The first step would be to fix wage theft and then the second step might be to get rid of the ultra rich, or maybe those could be done in the reverse order. At some point long after those things are accomplished we could talk about how people get jealous when they see someone else who apparently gets privileges that they wish they had. And sometimes there are small changes that can be made that will alleviate those situations.

[–] TheIvoryTower@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

In my country, a parent must be at home when their children arrive home. If both parents work, that means one has to come to an arrangement with their workplace to be home at 3.

If a non-parent has an important reason to be home at 3, they should also be allowed to leave early, but preventing kids from electrocuting themselves is a pretty important reason.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

On one side people shouldn't get special treatment for things of their chosing - that's just the Principle of fairness of treatment.

Nowadays in modern countries with easy access to modern contraception, having kids is a choice.

However given how for example in America there is a crack down on abortion, things are going backwards in this and having kids isn't always a choice anymore, in which case it's actually fair to more easilly accomodate people who have kids more than people who don't.

On the other side if a country wants to incentivise people to have children in order to, at minimum, avoid a fall in that country's population, it makes sense to do things to make life easier for people when they have children such as providing free childcare.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›