this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
543 points (96.7% liked)

Fuck AI

6568 readers
1454 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I guess I'm glad I was never a big Twat, so Bluesky wasn't a place of refuge for me the way Lemmy was when Reddit went off the rails.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] arcine@jlai.lu 7 points 2 days ago

I can kinda see the idea. Instead of putting the AI recommendation engine in the app, you have a separate app for it. Instead of relying on your behaviour, you decide what to prompt it to recommend.

But I think I'm probably being way too optimistic with this perspective description. If it is like I just described, though, I can see why some people would want to use it.

But it would likely still have to rely on collecting behavioural data to be any good, and it would cost humongous amounts of energy and resources... For very little benefit.

[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago

I knew it. Investors started pouring in, it was only a matter of time.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

As long as it's open source and customizable, I don't see the problem with this.

It's not bad that we have algorithms to find content. I'm sorting the comments of this thread with an algorithm

The key is that I can choose which algorithm I want to sort by, that algorithm is open source, and I can write my own algorithm, if I want.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's literally a twitter clone, what did you expect?

Just get off twitter, FFS. That entire website is a bane on humanity.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They're not doing anything to the app though, this is a standalone thing.

[–] KiloGex@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yet. They aren't doing anything to the app yet.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Call me when they do. Until then I'm using it. 🙂👍

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 9 points 2 days ago (4 children)

At some point they are going to have to make money.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

I agree that the server operators will need to do something to recoup costs. It's gonna be non-targeted ads, local to a server, or it's gonna be subscription. Or - ugh - it's gonna be selling our activities to some vendor. And there's gonna be a bit where some op goes too far and we all bail. Sure.

But we can bail, almost. And we can pick a better server. And we can vote against the fucking algorithm with our feet.

And while the idea that server ops need to break even is unpopular, it is the reality that's coming.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

I agree that the server operators will need to do something to recoup costs.

Everything from lemmy.world all the way up to Wikipedia do just fine on donations.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] visch@quokk.au 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I really wonder if Mastodon would have done better with a nicer, more techy name. Also, it’s silly but the double @ usernames look worse than the AT proto usernames.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hash@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 days ago
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

if only this could have been foreseen!

had there been a better alternative!

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›