this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
421 points (98.4% liked)

politics

29165 readers
3119 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago

Starting with himself, right? Pompous asshole.

[–] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Golden@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago

Cory Booker is Rand Paul with a D next to his name 

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 17 points 2 days ago (3 children)

“Americans want a new generation of leaders that show that they can lift the whole country up,” Booker added. “It is time for a new vision of our country that is far more uniting that brings people together, doesn’t deepen divides.”

And I want to see the Epstein class in a supermax prison. You know, let them see the kind of prison system they advocate for first hand.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I want to see them literally in a supermax prison.

As in, structural components of the walls.

Toss em into the framing, who cares if they get impaled on the rebar, pour the concrete.

Better idea, don't do that with a prison, just make a new monument or something, the shame cube.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago

I like it, but bones don't have the best structural integrity. Maybe they can be encased in concrete sculptures on the roof?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Chee_Koala@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Yeah, you first you poor excuse for a lukewarm wet towel.

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Let me guess: he's the solution.

[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago

Yes the Dems need to be near completely replaced including this moron. Anyone not bare minimum left of center (and that starts at being against capitalism) needs to go.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 6 points 2 days ago

He’s a fucking leader so I guess he’s right?

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I wonder how many people are confusing booker and Jeffries. Is booker (senator from NJ) in a leadership role? While he sucks for his own reasons, if he wants to boot Schumer, I'm with him on that at least.

[–] FudgyMcTubbs@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I have a very hard time watching Cory Booker speak. He over-emotes to the point of me feeling vicarious embarrassment.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

He has his moments. So far as I’ve seen, Jefferies doesn’t.

[–] null@lemmy.org 4 points 2 days ago

They need to come up with new and innovative ways to dump their entire base in favor of the mythical moderate center.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Lmao democrats are actively complicit in this moment and the many countless moments in the past [pick a time range] that led to this moment

[–] hash@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago

Yep I'm definitely out of it. My brain subbed in Doctorow and I was trying to figure out wtf he did to justify the comments...

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›