this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
421 points (98.4% liked)

politics

29165 readers
2351 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago

Let me guess, he should be leader? Even though he's part of the leadership that failed the moment?

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

David Hogg was working towards exactly that until the DNC ousted him. God forbid politicians do any fucking work.

[–] MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

I confused him with Cory Doctorow

Complaining about purity tests is often a dog whistle to say that the rights of minorities and women are expendable.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 1 points 18 hours ago

In concept, he's right.

Democrats have spent far far far too much energy focusing on controversial wedge issues like gun control and trans issues.

If they focused on the issues that virtually all Americans can get behind, things like fixing our healthcare, getting corruption out of Washington and other parts of government, holding large corporations to account when they destroy our economy and ruin the environment, and overall making life and upward advancement affordable for average Americans, they would absolutely clean house in every election.

Instead they spend a ton of effort on things like gun control (which does nothing for their base but only alienates rural moderates and Republicans that might make the switch), and spend a ton of time getting bogged down in debates over stupid shit.

When that happens if they had a half a brain they would be doing table flip moments like why the fuck are we talking about which bathroom somebody uses when millions of Americans can't feed their fucking kids? Why are we obsessing over what kind of ID gets you into a voting booth when the middle class is dying? Why are we wasting billions of dollars in Iran when the same money spent here at home would fix healthcare or hunger or education? Are our own citizens not worth the time or expense? And why do we have national policies that encourage a CEO to amass more wealth than all of his hourly employees combined?
And if any of these things are important to us, why then could the Republicans as a minority grind the government to a halt under Obama, forcing us to negotiate with them, why can't we do the same? Why aren't we doing the same?

Get a bunch of Democrats to say this every time, every camera, every interview, and that they will stand up against their own party when it doesn't work to fix this, that's how you win elections.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Corey Booker is a two faced liar

[–] dan69@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Throwing everyone under the bus to safe ur own ass.. smooth criminal here

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"We need new democratic leaders who are centrists unlike Hillary 'third way' Clinton, Joe 'tough on crime' Biden, and Kamala 'the cop' Harris."

[–] JennyLaFae@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

It's the same party just putting on a show to keep us complacent.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago

He also said that “purity tests” within the party have led to more division in the US.

What he's saying is he wants more Conservatives in the Democratic party.

F this guy and his failure of Democratic leadership.

[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 303 points 2 days ago (8 children)

He is objectively one of the people who has failed this moment.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 122 points 2 days ago (1 children)

At least he's calling for himself to be replaced.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

I can only imagine the thought in his head is:

If I say this first, and loudest, it therefore cannot apply to me, because I called it out.

Fucking terminal shitlib brain; everything is optics, history and context don't exist beyond when I want to A/B test some rhetoric.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 20 points 1 day ago

He's not the worst, but he's definitely part of the problem. When he calls for new leadership, he really means give it to him, and he wouldn't be much better than Schmuckie Boy. He'd be just as Zionist, that's for sure.

If Booker becomes president, MAGA will be back in power 4 years later.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I bet this asshole got a lot of noogies in school.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Then looks directly in the mirror unironocally

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 180 points 2 days ago (2 children)

....Does he realize he's talking about himself?

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 2 days ago

Definitely not.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 2 days ago

Me may still think his pointless filibuster will earn him leadership

[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

If you smelt it you dealt it. Get out and make room for someone who actually gives a fuck

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 127 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Objectively fucking hilarious.

This man has been responsible for stomping down the voices who seek to replace him. AOC, Mamdani, Ossof, Platner...keep naming them.

He is no different than Schumer. Fuck both of you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 62 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Motherfucker filibustered for over 24 hours, fasted in preparation to do so, only to undo every fucking word he spewed by voting in Trump's nominees.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 74 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It wasn't a filibuster. No legislation was being held up. He just gave a long speech as a performance piece. People keep trying to say he had the longest filibuster, but it literally wasn't one.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

He’s the 2nd most pathetic out of all the Dems besides Schumer. This dude only cares for appearing to do anything, but never actually does anything because he’s a bought centrist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrsVeggies@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Just another example of Democrats acting like they oppose themselves in order to crush thier opposition.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 30 points 2 days ago

this left-right divide is killing our country

So you want the nazi-simp vote. Got it.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 69 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yep, we all agree, he needs to be replaced or taken out of the leadership position. We will not forget that he and schumer voted to end the shut down we were winning for no reason that I can see.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (9 children)

You're talking about Jeffries, not Booker.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 33 points 2 days ago

Schumer's preference for centrist candidates

That is code for zionist first candidates. His extreme loyalty to Israel is disqualifying.

[–] chrislowles@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

The call is coming from inside the house

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago

You're right, Cory. So drop out of your fucking primary and endorse a real leader.

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He is definitely against litmus tests regarding AIPAC.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aaa999@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"'I’ve called for a generational renewal, because this left-right divide is killing our country and our adversaries know it.' He also said that 'purity tests' within the party have led to more division in the US."

yeah this is kind of the opposite issue of what anyone competent would want to address with chuck schumer

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Its also just complete horseshit.

Anybody remeber how David Hogg was actually trying to do this, 9 months ago, earlier than that?

And... basically 0 large parts of the Dem fundraising apparatus got involved in any way?

And... because Hogg tried to do this... he got ousted from his position in the party?

https://www.aol.com/david-hogg-pledged-unleash-20m-193729589.html?guccounter=1

You uh, you coulda said something at that point, Cory.

Flamethrowers for the ratfuckers, thats how they clean em up in the sewers of NYC, I hear.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Absolutely true.

But Booker ain't that leader.

load more comments
view more: next ›