this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026

288 points (96.5% liked)

People Twitter

9770 readers

1813 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

288

Funny business (infosec.pub)

submitted 2 days ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 96 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A wife massage with no funny business may often turn into a yes funny business massage, but only if the no funny business part goes well. And even then not always. But it's always a good idea to take the no funny business part seriously. The worst possible outcome is that she just has a better day instead.

[–] Illogicalbit@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Agreed. As an equally confused human as this OP, I think it’s about choice, luck, trust and possibly solar flares.

I too blunder through this world pretending I have an understanding of my wife of 20+ years and just opt to get excited when the light turns green.

[–] Yosmonkol@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

I knew a woman that would declare, early on in a relationship, that she didn't want any funny business ever but would very much want funny business a month later. I always assumed it was to filter out people that were only after funny business, or to gauge how their partner respects consent. Granted its not the same dynamic as in the OOP.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Human doesn’t understand the full breadth and implications of a situation until it has entirely elapsed. More news at 11

[–] jack_of_sandwich@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 2 days ago

Surprise funny business is better than rain-check funny business

[–] SandmanXC@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I have an MBA in funny business

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So you are useless at it?

[–] gndagreborn@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

That callout physically made me wince. Collateral damage.

[–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

So an MFBA?

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 days ago

so the end of their stand up comedy side hustle ?

[+] heliotrope@retrofed.com -13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wdym?

[–] endless_nameless@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

NTs are allergic to direct communication, often obscuring their wants/needs/feelings for no good reason.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There are significant benefits to indirect communication that far outweigh the benefits of direct communication. This concept is best captured by Douglas Adams in the famous

"Meanwhile, the poor Babel fish, by effectively removing all barriers to communication between different race and cultures, has caused more and bloodier wars than anything else in the history of creation."

[–] endless_nameless@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Listen Im neurodivergent I'm not mentally defective, you don't need to explain the benefits of indirect communication to me. Rather I think some neurotypicals need the benefits of direct communication explained to them.

There's a time and a place for everything. I'm not saying we should all talk like robots all the time. I'm saying NTs lean too heavily on one style and get pissy when people can't read their mind.

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm saying NTs lean too heavily on one style and get pissy when people can't read their mind.

We as a species evolved to rely heavily on indirect communication. It's natural to us to the point of subconsciousness. And it works in most of the cases.
So I wouldn't say NT lean too heavily on that.

With that said, I agree, that accommodation should be needed for disabled people even though they're a minority - as we do for handicapped, for example.

[–] endless_nameless@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Considering that miscommunication and misunderstanding are a common occurrence for practically everyone I would have to disagree. I've seen it end plenty of friendships over the years. In pretty much every case, if either party was willing to just speak clearly and directly it could have been resolved easily.

I can only speak for the US, but it really seems like we don't have that shared, intuitive language anymore. People are so different due to myriad of reasons to a point that it disrupts that intuitive communication. I know this is true because if I travel to a country with a more cohesive intuitive language, like India for example, it's actually a lot easier for me to understand that indirect communication because it's more consistent between people.