this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
136 points (96.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

47421 readers
1038 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Anarchy is a political structure where there’s basically no one in charge, right? But wouldn’t that just create a power vacuum that would filled by organized crime, corporations, etc.? Then, after that power vacuum is filled, we’re right back at square one, and someone is in charge.

Are there any political theorists that have come up with a solution to this problem?

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Klear@quokk.au 7 points 3 days ago

Anarchy means "without rule", so it describes a society where you were banned from 169

[–] dasrael@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] jaycifer@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (5 children)

If you read The Moon is a Harsh Mistress by Robert Heinlein that may give you an idea.

Otherwise, I attended Porcfest, the libertarian Porcupine Freedom Festival, back in 2016. Although it’s labeled libertarian, most folks I talked to discussed anarchy. One of the presentations I remember asserted that 8 is the optimal number of individuals in a decision making group. In his ideal anarchy individual people would assemble in groups of 8, who would then gather their groups or reps from their groups into a higher group of 8, and so on. Effectively higher level group decisions, if needed, would be made by a council that could be traced back to any individual.

I don’t know that that’s a good plan, but it may get your mind going on how to think about the topic.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Why 8. That is rife for deadlocks

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Alberat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special biweekly meeting. By a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs.

[–] GardenGeek@europe.pub 4 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Open source, direct internet democracy.

Let anyone vote on anything basically.

My hope is voters tend to vote on matters relevant to them providing initative to get/beeing informed on the matter they vote on.

I see representative systems as root of corruption so my solution calls for a system with direct decisions without political representatives.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No thanks, people are fucking stupid

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (3 children)

internet democracy

Ew no, Kill it with fire

Paper is harder to hack

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Paragone@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So, passengers in an airliner decide on managing the airliner, because they outvote the pilots!

Democracy!!


Democracy's still a kind of "boss", a kind of "archy".

I hold that, exactly as vertebrates all show, you have to have a brain, & you have to have COMPETENCE & RESPONSIBILITY & ACCOUNTABILITY based brain.

Pilots, not majority-on-the-aircraft, fly the aircraft.

Those who reject how immune-systems work, including immunization/vaccination ( done right ), ought be prevented from voting on immunization programmes.

Those who aren't living with the ability to get naturally pregnant, don't have any business voting on women-specific health issues, including abortion.

Etc.

Not accountable in that domain? no vote.

Not responsible in that domain? no vote.

Not competent in that specific domain? no vote.

Period.

This makes me intolerable among many ideologues/ideologies.

Which is good.

_ /\ _

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No. It means the airline is a cooperative business.

Anarchy means the laws are made by everyone not by a small group of people. And nobody can have more power than the rest. It's, to simplify it, the end of "because I say so".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›