this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
48 points (96.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

38865 readers
2307 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Since lawns are bad for the environment, what do you think lawns should be replaced with?

Optional poll if you want, since this place doesn't have polls,
https://submatrix.net/article/Polls/CYL6qLm7eL

I might add some of the suggestions

(page 2) 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zabadoh@ani.social 2 points 4 days ago

If you're community minded, a free vegetable garden might help you know your neighbors better.

https://foodisfreeproject.org/

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Heard something like a moss patch is much better.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

You can also not rake or otherwise dispose of leaves and other forms of yard waste. A lot of invertebrates depend on fallen leaves to lay their eggs or need them for insulation over the winter. Other animals also use leaves for things too.

[–] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

Vegetable gardens. Cost of groceries would be a motivator.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 1 points 4 days ago

Assuming you must keep and maintain that land then native plants to support pollinators and/or food for you (i.e. a garden).

In a more urban planning sense, central parks and gardens that give people plenty of space to run about, enjoy nature, and grow things as opposed to private yards is generally the way to go, IMO. Japan, for example, does this (though not enough in all places in Tokyo for example).

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I mean, the correct answer is MORE HOUSING. Yes, lawns are bad for the environment in their own right as a monoculture that requires dumping fertilizer and pesticides on it to maintain an "acceptable" quality. But if you are in the US, it is not unlikely that you have mandatory minimum lot sizes, minimum setbacks on all sides of the propety (especially large in the front), and a mandate that the front area must be grass. You also are not allowed to construct more structures on your lot for the purposes of housing, or run any kind of business on your property that might have customers physically visit the space or have any visible impact on the property.

The result is:

  • More expensive housing, since each house is required to sit on more land than it physically takes up.
  • More expensive cost of living, since finding sufficient new land requires building farther out, making commutes longer and therefore more expensive.
  • Car dependency for daily tasks, since no one can build a gym or a corner store in your neighborhood.
  • Reduced social cohesion, since even if a friend lives nearby, you will probably drive to their place since walking in a lawn-filled neighborhood is boring, and the gaps between homes mean their house is that much farther away
[–] aaa999@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

the entire debate is set up to promote answers other than this, the correct answer

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] confuser@lemmy.zip -1 points 3 days ago

Forgive the ai generated image but this gives me some wild ideas for natural yards lol

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago

Maybe gravel or hardscape? Or just don't put any effort into making anything around your house have any esthetic value. Anything you do to make the area surrounding your home look any different will require some level of resource drain.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›