this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
496 points (100.0% liked)

Memes of Production

1443 readers
528 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 68 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Agreed. What does it matter? That’s my name, photo, height, and weight. That’s me. Don’t look at my junk.

Btw I am not trans, I just believe in the right of my fellow countryfolk to choose how they want to live without persecution, like a true patriot should.

as a trans person, o7

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 60 points 3 days ago (5 children)

This is why I always use the more mysterious “partner” instead of boyfriend/girlfriend/husband/wife/etc.

You Don’t Know Me(☞゚ヮ゚)☞

[–] CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social 21 points 3 days ago

I do the same thing and people are sometimes visibly confused when my partner turns out to be opposite-sex 😊

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Which begs the question — why does my dentist need to know if I’m divorced?

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 days ago

I can’t think of any good reason, kinda weird to ask

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

...i've always used significant other or spouse because partner implies transactional logistic or business relationships...

[–] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I like significant other because they're very significant to me!

i have never been more prepared for this moment
ᕕ(⌐■ω■)ᕗ ♪♬

[–] Dippy@beehaw.org 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why do cops need to know a gender?

[–] traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago

Cause they are sick little freaks.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 10 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Well, the reason it's on there is the same reason as height, eye color, hair color, etc. To aid in identification.

[–] qualia@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But outward indicators (gender) are performative and not biologically determined like sex is. And unless you're dropping trow when you're pulled over for a ticket, sex doesnt aid in identification.

[–] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If it's for quick identification though, cis presenting being wrong would be like 1 in 10000 or less.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

and if that's the case, it should be about self declared presentation, not the gender assigned at birth.

following paragraph deserves hate, so if you comment to complain I agree with you:

if it was actually to help with identification, then at worse it should be the gender that the DMV clerk thinks you are, and include options for androgynous. as it's based on how someone is seen. (I 100% agree that it is bullshit, but trying to clarify how using agab makes no sense)

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Sometimes I think we should replace gender with genre. There's lots of genres for books and music. Fantasy, dark fantasy, steampunk. Why not for humans too

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 2 points 3 days ago

Fun fact: It's already a thing in neo-latin languages, it would be dope if it gets adopted in English

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Me reading my card for the first time: "looks like an asshole" aww. :'(

can you believe they give licenses for this?

[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I love this WAY more.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

Ah yes, hair color, so good for identification and hard to spoof. Seriously, the picture is all it takes.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

And yet, from the beginning of time we have stories of people who used that erroneous assumption to avoid detection/identification.

Take a random group of people such as a Live Television Audience, have them all put on gray sweats in their size. Hood up or down by choice. Have your local cop arrange them in order from most feminine to most masculine, first facing away (as in pursuit) and then face front.

You're gonna have a few truly surprising outliers and a lot of pissed-off people in the middle areas but not where they want.

That's why you used the cop. Everyone hates them already and can restore their own feelings by disregarding their opinions.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This could make for a viral YouTube video if done right. Plenty of rage bait for everyone there. Wonder if it was and no one noticed.

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 days ago

As a person who wears clothes, how could sex possibly help with identification? My sex organs are not visible in public.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Do you not know about hair coloring, lifts, colored contacts, etc.?

[–] bjorney@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago

I don't know it would be any more useful than the photo though

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago

How about no IDs at all? Is that workable? Something I've been pondering as we see all of the abuses a "papers, please" society can lead to.