Let’s say, though a stretch it may be, that this somehow was not extreme negligence, nor malice, but somehow it was the cost of violent conflict. Then maybe we shouldn’t get into violent conflicts for no reason because of the real human cost.
news
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
That would require some amount of empathy. The people running most wars think in terms of power and money.
Republicans love school shootings.
People need to go to prison for this. The idea of zero consequences for this travesty is just... heinous.
It was on purpose. It was a "double tap" strike designed to maximize casualties, and they've hit more schools since the first one. These facts disprove any notion that this was an accident, or an AI's fault.
Even if it was an AIs fault, and I'm not saying it was, someone must have been guilty by deciding to trust the AI. Someone would have been in a position of authority and decided to completely trust the data of an untested AI. That person killed 175 people, mostly children.