this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
48 points (100.0% liked)

news

807 readers
709 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] henfredemars 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Let’s say, though a stretch it may be, that this somehow was not extreme negligence, nor malice, but somehow it was the cost of violent conflict. Then maybe we shouldn’t get into violent conflicts for no reason because of the real human cost.

[–] Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz 5 points 5 days ago

That would require some amount of empathy. The people running most wars think in terms of power and money.

[–] Snailpick42@lemmus.org 4 points 4 days ago

Republicans love school shootings.

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

People need to go to prison for this. The idea of zero consequences for this travesty is just... heinous.

It was on purpose. It was a "double tap" strike designed to maximize casualties, and they've hit more schools since the first one. These facts disprove any notion that this was an accident, or an AI's fault.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 4 points 4 days ago

Even if it was an AIs fault, and I'm not saying it was, someone must have been guilty by deciding to trust the AI. Someone would have been in a position of authority and decided to completely trust the data of an untested AI. That person killed 175 people, mostly children.