this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
325 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

34832 readers
1 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google's anti-ad scripts are breaking browsers and privacy plugins. It could get worse because Google controls the ad market, Chrome, and the extension store.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LadyLikesSpiders@lemmy.ml 91 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Still having 0 problems on Firefox with just Ublock Origin and adguard. Hopefully it stays that way

[–] Anamana@feddit.de 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Are you logged in? Cause if not you don't get these popups.

[–] LadyLikesSpiders@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

Yes I am. I even got the pop-ups for a couple days a week ago, but I just closed the pop ups and resumed the videos with no ads

[–] vinyl@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I got those popups while not even being logged in at some points, but just purging the cache on uBlock filters seems to work.

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Having Ublock Origin doesn't guarantee success, read this: https://lemmy.world/comment/4933251

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] JWBananas@startrek.website 37 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The irony of this post being behind a paywall

[–] rgb3x3@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is a dumb take. Being behind a paywall means it's not controlled by Google and its ad network.

Are these webpages and people just supposed to work for free?

[–] JWBananas@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is hosting YouTube infrastructure free?

[–] rgb3x3@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I pay for YouTube and I think people need to stop complaining so much about ads if they're not willing to support the infrastructure or the creators they likely watch hours and hours of content from.

I also think Google is charging too much and should decouple music from videos, but that's another subject.

[–] JWBananas@startrek.website 2 points 2 years ago

I also pay for YouTube. I just don't normally bring it up because it usually results in a lot of rather unpleasant replies.

It's fascinating, really.

Google gets a lot of hate for being a data collection behemoth. The whole "if you aren't paying, you are the product" thing. And rightfully so.

And pirates love to say that if companies would just charge a reasonable rate for an easy-to-use service, then they would just pay instead of pirating.

But when it comes to YouTube, a lot of people seem to want to have it both ways.

[–] itmightbethew@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

404 media in particular do great work. They're all defectors from Motherboard (vice) and I think supporting them is both worthwhile and worth it.

[–] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] themusicman@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

ublock origin works

[–] N00b22@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

NewPipe is a third party app, hence you don't get any popups. Doesn't mean YT can't do anything to stop you tho

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Could they really do anything though? Newpipe directly scrapes the content, after all

[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

My only issue with it is that it's slightly outdated, so I run BraveNewPipe: https://github.com/bravenewpipe/NewPipe/tree/v0.25.2-2.1.4

(It implements the same features while also adding support for some extra platforms)

[–] small44@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

It made me switch to Freetube

[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So far a Firefox workaround seems to be copying the URL into a fresh private browser window.

It may not be enough to matter, but a not-insignificant number of users will simply abandon YouTube if this keeps up.

[–] badelf@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Allready done. 😃 Some puts a YouTube link, I just scroll past. Can't be that important if it's on boobtube

[–] Venicon@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is…is boobtube a thing?

It sounds like it should be a thing

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Modern day adaptation of a much older term.

Note: don't look up boobtube at work lol

[–] Venicon@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

Well well well, today I learned!

[–] CaptObvious@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

ROFL! I haven’t heard boobtube since the 70s! 😂

[–] badelf@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Trust me. I'm that old. 🤣

[–] MiddledAgedGuy@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

a not-insignificant number of users will simply abandon YouTube if this keeps up.

I regetfully disagree. I think very few people will leave the platform and that the additional revenue generated from those that use adblockers but allow YouTube ads will easily cover the difference of those that do.

I don't say this to discourage boycotting. Fuck google, do it if you want to!

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

FreeTube works fantastic on desktop. No ads and instant playback and high quality. Amazing app.

[–] cavemeat@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

I second this, I use freetube and I love it

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Piped.video (on Firefox) works fine for me

[–] Flying_Hellfish@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Piped is so slow for me, I'm not sure if it's a me issue or a host issue. I finally spun up viewtube to test it out since running my own piped instance seemed cumbersome.

[–] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Same here. I tried loading the same 13-second video on Piped and YouTube. YouTube played it instantly. Piped took several seconds (probably longer than the video lasted) to start playing.

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

To be fair, Piped serves as a proxy, you're not getting the content served directly from YouTubes' servers

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah it works file for 720/1080p and no captions.

[–] Catweazle@social.vivaldi.net 2 points 2 years ago