this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
26 points (69.7% liked)

You Should Know

45163 readers
163 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated. We are not here to ban people who said something you don't like.

If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If you have assets in a bank, stock market, investment platform, 401(k) or other pension then there are a number of risks that threaten not only the existence of those funds but your access to them.

First of all, don't expect to hold onto them unless you go along with the government's game of Simon says. For example, there is a good chance that you will be forced to get digital ID to access these in the future.

Vietnam is an example of what is likely to come soon, where biometrics were made mandatory to access all bank accounts. The 86 million accounts which weren't biometrically verified were frozen and are now being closed. Transfers equivalent to around $390 or more also require biometric verification.

Many in the western world have also had their bank accounts frozen or closed for perfectly legal political views. And now when you move or withdraw money you may be asked what the purpose is and the bank may deny your request if they don't like your answer (just one example). Banks are also required to report anything deemed suspicious to the government.

If such restrictions can be applied to bank accounts, there's no reason why they can't be applied to accounts at stock exchanges and accounts with 401(k) and pension providers.

In Hungary and Poland, all private pensions were seized by the government and nationalized, leading many to accuse the government of stealing their pensions. Existing state pensions aren't safe either, as they are often considered unsustainable due to unchecked government spending and aging populations.

Banks and pension providers can also fail, as we saw in 2023, and US banks have continued to fail every year since then. While on paper there are often guarantees to cover such events, these usually only cover up to a certain amount, and these may not be honored during a financial crisis.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You telling me when I give someone else my money there's no guarantee that they will give it back? I am shocked and outraged! Just don't tell my wife.

/S

[–] StopTech@lemmy.today 8 points 6 days ago

You'd be surprised how many people don't know that

[–] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

I'm curious, what is your alternative here?

If you say crypto, I'll say lol. If you say under your mattress I'll lmao. If you say physical gold, I'll chuckle subtly.

In this world there aren't perfect answers. You do the best with what you're dealt.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

The imperfect answer is to diversify. If you think there is a real risk that you get screwed by the organizations you are trusting your money with, keeping some portion of your wealth in any of those things you are ridiculing is a rational choice to hedge against that risk.

Those are all also risky, but the risks are different as they are (mostly) about your personal security rather than trustworthiness of institutions, meaning you have a lot more protection from being completely wiped out in a single event.

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yupp this guy is right. I'd also say you should consider (OP) that Gold specifically tends to do better when the US dollar is doing bad.

And now that US and Isreal is hellbent on starting a world war I'd say that's a pretty safe bet to have some gold and silver around.

[–] StopTech@lemmy.today 2 points 5 days ago

This post wasn't about recommendations, just information that people should know. Make your own decisions based on your own assessment of the risks and likely returns associated with each option. I'd say precious metals in your physical possession are a simple option with low risk but that's my opinion.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It has its own issues. Like converting to FIAT / transactions having sizable fees in some cases.

Beyond that, some folks lose their private keys and some exchanges go under.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago

Losing private keys is definitely the biggest hurdle. Other than that, I find the frictionless nature to be quite beneficial for managing wealth.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

Well as long as you don't complain about it being unfair

[–] middlemanSI@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

ISK what 401(k) means..unless this is US limited info, in which case not ISK.

[–] rando@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah it is US only (AFAIK) retirement scheme

[–] paper_moon@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

And scheme, it is. They offloaded the responsibility of retirement planning from the employer and financial planners, to the individual. After Eron, obviously the existing system had problems, but now all the responsibility and financial risk has been punted to the individual, so society can say "well, its your own fault!" When you don't have enough money in retirement years, as the lack of social nets and healthcare costs eat through what little you had saved. There's no one to sue or blame but yourself at the end. Fun.

[–] rando@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yup I hate it, and it’s all I get for my own retirement. They mandate we put our financial future / well being in Wallstreet stocks… hmmm I wonder who that grossly benefits?… I was born after all that shit was instituted and into this broken ass system

[–] pishadoot@sh.itjust.works -2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

It's not a scheme, it's the government using tax breaks to encourage the positive behavior of saving your money for when you're old. That's literally what it is.

Tax credits for buying EVs is another example of the government using tax breaks to encourage people to do something that's beneficial.

Lots of people just don't save money. 401Ks make it easy and you get good returns, and penalties for withdrawing before you're old. So you put money in because usually you'll have a lot more later, and then you keep it until you're old so you don't get penalties and lose a bunch of money.

I swear this site is full of the dumbest people on the Internet.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Let's be more concrete. The real danger here is that the rules around 401ks and IRAs could be changed with new legislation. Or perhaps through a twisted interpretation of law via executive order. Or that new taxes could be levied against them.

The kleptocrats are in charge. And the wealth of the middle class can be plundered to give to the billionaires. For example, maybe they find a way to raise the age where IRA and 401ks can be accessed without the 10% penalty. Or they just straight-up announce a new tax on 401k account balances in order to feed the war effort. The retirement savings of the middle class are one of the few areas the kleptocrats haven't managed to completely plunder yet. You start a big war. You somberly announce the need for all sorts of new taxes. You conveniently write them so they fall lightly on the rich and heavily on the middle class. You tax the middle class and feed the proceeds to the defense contractors. The wealthy owners of those defense contractors end up with the profits. The retirement accounts of working people get raided to feed the billionaires.

[–] paper_moon@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

...I know how its supposed to work, I'm just saying instead of giving us healthcare and social nets we get to save money under our own responsibility, and then watch it get spent away in elder years. If you haven't watched family members spend hundred of thousands on cancer care, or emergency room visits, etc, even though they 'did the right thing' and saved, you eventually will.

Also, thanks for calling me dumb. You're quite a great person to converse with... Don't bother replying, I won't be reading any more of your comments because it will not be pleasant exchange of opinions, it seems...

[–] uuj8za@piefed.social 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So... should I start stashing my cash under my mattress?

[–] StopTech@lemmy.today 2 points 5 days ago

Better to stash precious metals since they won't lose their value. Of course there are other options so make your own decisions based on your own assessment of the various risks involved.