3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.
The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io
There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No porn (NSFW prints are acceptable but must be marked NSFW)
No Ads / Spamming / Guerrilla Marketing
Do not create links to reddit
If you see an issue please flag it
No guns
No injury gore posts
If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![]()
Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible
Yes! FreeCAD is amazing and these updates look great. I don't know why so many people are taking this chance to complain about it. You don't have to use it!
The confidence that it won't be paywalled, or enshittified, or otherwise screwed over by a corporation is worth a lot to me, but I think it's fine if that's not the case for everyone. Enjoy whatever else you want to use. Improvements in FreeCAD can only be good for everyone, right?!
I've done all my work in Freecad for years. Its really good at converting a stl back in to a solid. Some think its hard to do but its really easy and consistent. Some take more steps than others but its a solid tool for doing a rework on a 3d printable object. I can usually in a matter of minutes split a stl into separate models for multi color printing.
What's your workflow for this? I have a handful of stls I would love to tweak.
This is going to be a upside down work flow since it varies depending on what you are trying to achieve. If you want to split an object up in order to make it a multi part/color print then start with 1a otherwise start with 1
Start with a new document
import stl file
Under the part menu convert to 'shape from mesh'
Under the part menu in the copy menu click 'refine shape' not required but I find it sometimes makes the resulting solid a little smoother.
Under the part menu click 'Convert to solid'
If all steps are successful you are done. If not then delete everything and start back with the mesh. The most common error for me is 'Cannot convert because Shape is not a shell'
1a. Under the mesh menu click 'Split by components' There are also some repairs you can make on a mesh under analyze. I rarely use these but have had some success with them from time to time. This will create at least two component meshes. I've had many more than that and at some point it isn't worth it at least for me.
2a .Perform steps 1 through 5 on all components. Under the part menu select all the converted solid components and use the union tool to create a fusion of them.
I've been learning CAD for printing. I really want to use FreeCAD, but every time I try to do anything, I sink 2 hours into reading wiki's and watching videos. When I apply what I've learned, I end up with a cube (sometimes a cylinder!) and a wall of errors. Then I hop into tinkerCAD/fusion360 and create what I need in 15 minutes.
I'm looking forward to the day that FreeCAD is intuitive enough for me to hop in and do what I need in 15 mins without feeling like I'm manually programming a lunar landing. It's not there yet, but I'm happy to see the update.
Checkout Deltahedron freecad tutorials on youtube. As a complete beginner, I got reasonably good at freecad pretty fast with them.
Keep trying and keep practicing. Install FreeCAD and practice with MangoJelly tutorials to learn.
One thing that often makes it hard for people switching to any new CAD is things don't work the same way. So do your best to forget the way you used to do things. Fusion isn't FreeCAD and FreeCAD isn't Fusion. You will need to learn new things. So don't expect it to work the same way.
The next thing that is very helpful is to find models to practice and gain confidence and skills. MangoJelly tutorials are great to learn from, but you need varied practice to gain skills. Here are 50 models you can practice with to gain confidence and skills using any CAD program. Other practice models can be found if you do some searching.
Good Luck!
I absolutely get you since that was my experience also.
It's a concept thing for me. Do everything in sketches and make something with it using the Partdesign workbench. But knowing that you can't just draw a cube and extend part of one face like you can in fusion helped me to understand the take freecad has in cad.
There are some very basic beginner friendly tutorials out there on YouTube. That's what did it in the end for me.
you can't just draw a cube and extend part of one face
I used to work with sketches in SOLIDWORKS and Inventor too, but those were just easier to use.
Still, it keeps improving, so fingers crossed.
Oh, yeah, I understood sketches being the starting point, I just lived on the struggle bus any time I tried to sketch anything. The interface is close enough to vector drawing, that it constantly felt like I knew what I was doing, except everything I did threw an error 😅 or the things that in vector drawing would be a simple 'click on an anchor and drag', are multi-step processes involving a spreadsheet here.
I know a lot of it is a matter of practice, and I'm sure there are also growing pains for the software. I'm genuinely excited by the changes they've made to modifying sketches, and the little explanations at the bottom of the screen, I hope they are able to keep the momentum going.
Looking forward to trying it out. I've been teaching myself Freecad for a while and I'll be honest, it has been a mildly infuriating experience at times. Still seems like the best option for a free CAD tool without ridiculous licensing terms though. This looks like quite an improvement in any case. Hopefully it'll even fix the regular crashes I've been getting.
I've been using it since it was a weekly release, (now I mostly use the 1.2 weeklies), and it's been very stable even on a low powered mini desktop with 8 Gbits of shared RAM. I think they are finally finishing up the timeline that was set out when they went after the TNP mitigation and general cleanup of the disaster that was .1X series of FreeCAD with the 1.0 release.
Spoiler Alert: I think the 1.2 Weekly releases are even better yet. So give that a shot if you are willing to put up with occasional breakage and problems. The more users of different skills with different hardware can really help speed the killing of bugs if you report issues. Besides, it's just plain fun!
I just want to say this YouTuber got a sub from me last night. Went into his back catalogue and recent videos were really good and I learned a few nice things.
Regarding fc1.1, I really like the update. These guys are on the gas and making substantial updates. I can't overstate how .9 whatever was hard to use vs 1.0 and now 1.1 is another leap again. It's just great to see.
I speak as someone that only started learning any CAD as a hobby in the last 5 years. I've toyed with every (free) program short of going the pirate route and I'm really glad to see a FOSS alternative start to step up.
I do still have a laundry list of things I'd like to see them fix/change. But as is, it's working well enough for my use cases!
He's very good. He is one of the developers of FreeCAD. MangoJelly tends to be my go to though.
I knew MangoJelly but not this Deltahedra. I'm finding the latter's video more interesting tbh, and less time-wasting.
Deltahedra is fast-paced for sure. I enjoy his tutorials also. Another person you can check out is AllVisuals4U. He makes short and to the point tutorials also. He keeps them to 5 to 6-minute videos.
Thanks!
I just recently discovered him and watching someone who knows what they're doing use the workflows the right way has been a FreeCAD game changer for me.
Time to give it another try I guess. I used Fusion almost exclusively until I switched to Linux (and have also used Solidworks in the past), and I found freecad 1.0 to be an exercise in frustration.
I gave it a very solid shot, but after many hours messing with it and watching tutorials I decided to try Onshape instead. I was able to become comfortable and productive in Onshape in less than half the time it took me to lose my cool with freecad.
The 1.1 update looks to be addressing some of the pain points, so they seem to be on the right track. I hope they keep that momentum going.
What's the vendor lock-in like with Onshape? My father used a "free" year of Solidworks and when it was over he was locked out from all his projects unless he paid. He uses FreeCAD exclusively now and is happy to own his files.
With Onshape unless you pay them money your files are public. You can't use the free version for commercial use. Some advanced features are blocked like simulations.
Do not use Onshape for any purpose whatsoever. Anything you produce with it can be trivially stolen by others. I don't even trust their paid (i.e. extortion) tier to protect your files stored in their cloud from being perused privately by Onshape themselves just in case you may happen to have produced anything commercially viable, and/or shared with the feds.
Just don't.
Not so many viable options on Linux. I don't think many people are unaware their work is public, but it is a very good and reliable platform nonetheless.
OpenCAD as a comparison crashes on my setup if I ad much as load one of the example models included in the program.
I don't love the public saves in Onshape but I would probably not be doing any modeling at all without it.
I've been able to freely export .step files for anything I've made in Onshape. As another commenter said there are catches, like all your files are public if you're using the free version and there are premium features that require payment. But it's currently not locked down like it seemed Autodesk were preparing to do, where all your files live on their cloud only and can never be exported. For sure there is potential for the same enshittification with Onshape though, which is why I hope the freecad devs soldier on.
Also if you're worried about your files being public, just name them with codes indecipherable to anyone but you. It doesn't seem like the public file repository actually gets searched that much in general, and with a meaningless code the odds of someone finding and stealing a specific design are probably near zero.
I have used Fusion and can get what I want from it. But I have an intense dislike of the clown car UI.
So sit down and watch MangoJelly's tutorials and practice them. Enjoy that smooth Aussie voice. It takes time to learn new things so don't give up. We're pulling for you!
Can we get a link to the release article and not post links to some shitty video?
It's pretty simple don't watch it then. No one, least of all me, is going to force you to watch it.
That commenter was rude but it would be nice to have a link to the release for those of us not in an environment to watch the video. I appreciate video posts even if I cant watch them though!
I understand. But I made an "executive decision" for the video link because most people like to see some the improvements in action. I felt that it would get more people excited and would be quicker for them to get through.
The extensive change log is on the FreeCAD github page if you want to read all about it. Download FreeCAD 1.1 while you are there!
And I highly encourage everyone at least skim through that page to see all the changes as they get the time to do so.
I really struggled to try to get into FreeCAD, but I don't totally blame FreeCAD because I've also struggled with "real" CAD programs, my brain just doesn't really seem to work that way.
OpenSCAD and other programmatic CAD on the other hand makes me feel like a goddamn wizard magically combining shapes in the ether to create the most absurd objects.
I explained this to my engineer brother and he laughed and said he had already thought about OpenSCAD being right up my alley and wasn't surprised, but he finds it extremely difficult and counterintuitive for him. It's funny how we must have totally different mental models of working with 3d shapes I guess.
I was the same way. I started with OpenSCAD and it made way more sense at first.
But what drove me to FreeCAD was when my parts started getting more and more complicated. I think it was being able to chamfer or fillet all the things that really pushed me.
I am in awe of experts of either program though. I think I still really love how openSCAD is so much easier to understand the steps someone took to get to a finished model when you look at other people's work. And you can just lift pieces out and reuse them.
Openscad is such a neat piece of software. If only it had chamfers and fillets it might be useful, too.
I watched this video and shouted at my screen like most people watch sports or a new tech launch. "Fuck, yeah!" "Goddamn!" "Holy shit that's brilliant." "That didn't make sense but it is really cool anyway!"
Anyway, good job, FC team.
Wow this looks good