this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
1665 points (99.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

11217 readers
2440 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArrowMax@feddit.org 36 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

"Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them."


Frank Herbert in Dune, 1965.

Relevant as ever

[–] dipcart@lemmy.world 35 points 6 days ago (7 children)

So funny to be like AI can retrieve facts in .3 seconds. First of all, no it can't. Second of all, can't search engines do this? Haven't they been doing this for years? Like AI is slower, less accurate and more wasteful than duckduckgo. Shouldn't all her points have been true years ago?

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago

forgive her, she's been outsourcing all mental activity for a while.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

they're sending kids to school to learn things that are already in books! and if they wanted to know them they could just learn them from a book! why even bother to learn from a book when they could learn it from a book?!

[–] Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Throw the book at 'em!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 52 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Theres a reason American slaves weren't allowed to read or write. Why little girls in Afghanistan aren't allowed to go to school past 3rd grade.

What's going to happen when you can't read agreements or reports. And just have to believe what someone else tells you it says.

?

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Whats worrying is that im already in that situation now with all the 50 page user agreements. Like fuck am I reading that every time.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

You know, I do research and there are rules that the informed-consent documents have to be written at an 8th grade reading level.

No jargon. No technical writing.

Simple and clear. So that when people agree to be in a study, they actually do understand what that involves.

Otherwise they can sue the hell out of you for misleading them.

Why is this also not a requirement for "terms and service"?

They intentionally write it in "legalise" so that the average person cannot understand it.

I think it should have to follow the same rules as informed-consent documents.

[–] spitfire@lemmy.world 68 points 6 days ago (2 children)

God forbid they learn how to think, when LLMs can do it (kind of) for them

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I love how some people are ready to just give up on everything now that AI can do it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Exactly. School isn't really about memorizing facts, it's about learning and honing Critical Thinking Skills. That's how humans are supposed to think, and without it, people substitute chaotic thinking that makes them susceptible to manipulation.

Also, it teaches us how to interact with other humans, so our first instinct isn't just to KILL them.

That's why we go to school.

[–] spitfire@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

At least it should be this way, the reality might be different sometimes:/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tristan@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 58 points 6 days ago (6 children)

I never thought this would need saying, but the point of writing essays in school is not the final product.

That essay will almost never be good enough to be relevant or published; no one expects it to be. The goal is to engage with the material, and learn to synthesise and present your ideas logically.

We must grade the process of writing an essay, never the final product; especially not based on how “good” an essay that final product is.

We’ve got to stop and ask ourselves why people don’t have AI complete video games for them, but do so for essays. It’s because in one case, the value is in the process, while in the other, the value is believed to be the result, but it shouldn’t be.

If people understood this, it would make no sense having AI write students’ essays. You can blame people for wanting to take shortcuts, but I believe our society and culture at large play a much bigger role in that trend.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Waay back in high school I had a teacher who just aimed for getting an essay written at all. He had one assignment per week: a 5 paragraph essay due every Friday.

If you turned one in: automatic 75%, baseline. Turn in garbage each week? C grade free. He even said you could turn the same essay in each week. 75%. C.

If you missed it, 0% no make-up work.

A lot of the class failed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (2 children)

You're right, but there's no easy way to grade the effort without looking at the final result. That's how you end up with a school system that prioritizes test results so much it ends up teaching students how to pass a test instead of learning and processing information.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

I don't know if it's still the case, but when I was in school for non-exam (i.e. timed) essays, they were split into outlines and drafts, and the drafts were individually graded as a portion of the entire essay grade, so there was a way to gauge the process rather than simply the final submission.

I always found that process frustrating, however, because English was easily my best subject and the teacher would get upset if I turned in a 2nd draft that was identical to the first because I was already basically there. Now that I'm older, I understand the reason for why the teacher structured the lessons in such a way.

I also think that essays in general are a much better metric for measuring true understanding of a topic, at least compared to multiple choice.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 26 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Sometimes advances in technology do mean that things that they teach in school are outdated and can probably safely be removed.

I'd say cursive writing is one of those things. Writing in general is important, and obviously kids need to learn how to write upper case and lower case block letters. But, with computers everywhere, a whole secondary set of characters that is designed to be linked together seems useless.

I also do think that schools probably focus too much on memorization. I absolutely hated history in school because that's how it was taught. Memorize the name of these battles and the dates and then regurgitate them for the test. I didn't actually learn anything meaningful. What would have been much more useful and much more interesting would have been to learn more of the backstory. What was going on in the country that led it to go to war. Were they trying to distract from something, or get the people to unite against a common enemy? Were they supremely confident that they could easily win and gain important territory or resources? Were they backed into a corner?

I'd support not memorizing as many things because it's true that you can look them up (of course, AI is not how you should ever look anything up because it might just 'hallucinate'). I think most teachers would agree. But, it's also a lot harder to write and grade a good test when you're not doing names and dates. So, I assume that's another big part of the reason that memorization is the focus.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (7 children)

You know they don't teach typing anymore either. Yeah Ive got 3 nieces and a nephew. None of them can use a keyboard properly. They type with their index fingers.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Kage520@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They took out cursive from the curriculum for a while, but they are supposedly putting it back now. I think they are suggesting the brain learns a little differently with cursive so it's still useful in that manner.

Also I think you'd enjoy the podcast I listen to, American History Tellers. I hated history for the same reasons you describe but this podcast really made me enjoy it. Usually they open a topic with something like "Imagine it's in the late 1800s, and you are opening up shop. Times have been hard since [backstory], but you are getting by okay. You do worry about [current topic], and feel worse when you read today's paper." Even that small little setup kind of ropes you in to feel like it's relatable.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ugandan_airways@lemmy.zip 19 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I just looked at that woman’s twitter and it’s an absolute nightmare. AI really makes some stupid people think they are smart.

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Or is it just some AI bot trying to promote AI?

[–] ugandan_airways@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 days ago

Very possible. The whole purpose of the account is to grift. White trash looking woman claiming to have financial freedom due to AI.

[–] Boppel@feddit.org 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

she wrote a comment that a bot could have written better

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Who's to say it didn't?

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Why learn to read and write while there's speech recognition and text-to-speech apps nowadays?

[–] Johandea@feddit.nu 19 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I'm sorry, but can you please attach the youtok link to your comment. I need to hear what you said, since I can't read...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 6 days ago (3 children)

AI "retrieves" facts? Not my experience.

I was personally not able to reproduce this https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/52tYaGQgaEPvZaHTb/was-barack-obama-still-serving-as-president-in-december but it should still provide an illustration of what AI's ideas of retrieving facts looks like.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (3 children)

i recently got access to the paid version of Claude at my job. they wanted us to automate some routine tasks, fine. i had it make something, then asked how i could save it as a skill for future use. it said it doesn't have skills or macros. i said what, yes there are skills right there in the customize section. it came back with the usual "you're right! let me check... oh yes indeed there is such a function. my bad. here's more information from the web: ..."

like... oh my god. imagine if this were an unpaid intern. they would be immediately shot into the atmosphere. but instead we pay for this shit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] VinegarChunks@lemmus.org 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

In my experience Microsoft Copilot is wildly inaccurate about facts describing aspects of Microsoft software products like Teams, or even Microsoft Copilot itself.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago

Exactly! Learn those kids stuff ai can't do! Send them to the mines!

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 12 points 6 days ago

The only war is gym class war.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 6 points 6 days ago

"Hey ChatGPT, was the American Civil War about slavery?" Having that fact stored in your head is inherently different than looking it up. Knowing that America has a history of racism and the south have a history of revisionism is very important. This is why some gullible folks really do believe confederate monuments are just about heritage despite being built in during the civil rights movement. It's not the sort of thing you'd think to "ask AI" at all if you didn't already have some of the groundwork. An education is important.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Who needs facts when you have GrokAI teacher!

Now students don't need traditional teachers at all with fabulous lesson plans like, "Was the Holocaust even real?"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

What a braindead take, I seriously hope this idiot doesn't have children of her own

load more comments
view more: next ›