this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
928 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

83295 readers
4581 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 183 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's so infuriating... I occasionally do astrophotography and it's getting to the point where any long exposure just has satellite streaks everywhere... Fuck Musk.

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 76 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I remember just 10 years ago using a special app on my phone to alert me of any potential satellite flares so I could run out and catch them.

Now I can't look at the night sky for 2 minutes without seeing one.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You can actually see some in broad daylight. I was shocked one day looking up and seeing one (white dot in the picture, verified with sat tracking app).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 114 points 1 week ago (7 children)

LEO satellite internet service is life changing for people who live in underserviced, rural, and remote areas - but it’s a tragedy that it’s controlled by billionaires and the USA. Growth at all costs mindset cannot accept that they should exist only as an ISP of last resort, so they’re servicing urban areas and planning data centres.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 54 points 1 week ago (8 children)

It would be better to support public fiber infrastructure (through PUDs) in almost every way. I know not all remote areas can be reached with fiber, but most rural areas can be. My county has done exactly that with the rural portions - they focused on rolling it out to underserved rural areas first (even though it was more expensive to do that up front). Now, those rural areas have gigabit fiber and they didn't have to pay tens of thousands to wire it up to their homes.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world 86 points 1 week ago (8 children)

LEO satellites decay very quickly every one of them will burn up in the atmosphere within 10 years. They need to be replaced constantly. As soon as spacex goes out of business these will all fall out of the sky.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Any way to help them do that?

[–] youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No way that’s cheaper or easier than waiting

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm wondering from a pure academic standpoint here honest. Like What about a laser?

[–] youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Lmao I wish. Satellites and their components have to be “hardened” to survive extreme temperatures and radiation in space. There’s probably nothing on it you could disable with any laser you could buy. Plus there’s the matter of targeting them.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Destroying these satellites with lasers poses a similar problem to what happens when you light zombies on fire: the satellites are held in space by their momentum and the reduced atmosphere vs Earth's gravity. If you break the satellites into pieces via laser, then now you have uncontrolled and unpredictable space junk to deal with. Some of the pieces might return sooner, but what was once a concern is now a problem. Just like how a zombie at your door is very concerning, a zombie on fire at your door is an immediate problem.

Now, what could be interesting would be sending up another satellite that sprays black paint on the sun-facing side of other satellites. The energy absorbed and then exhausted could propel it towards Earth sooner. Maybe? I dunno, I'm just a simple country Fartographer, your honor.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Now with lasers you buy perhaps, what about with the lasers you build?

In the future where Federal Authority is concentrated on robbing and stealing elsewhere, I cannot imagine a high energy beam could not take these motherfuckers out.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If you have the capability to build a laser that can focus enough energy, from the ground through the atmosphere, with enough precision to lock on to an LEO constellation member long enough to disable it, you’d probably already either be captured, or working for DoD.

Also: great, you exploded it before reentry. Now we have a hundred thousand smaller, lighter fragments skipping off the atmosphere, disbursing randomly, and spinning around like hypersonic chaff bullets for actual worthwhile spacecraft and satellites to fly through, twinkling in infrared like a billion new streaky sparkles on those telescopes. It takes a lot longer for all that bullshit to rain down, and it pollutes just the same. Tell me, who were you fighting for again and why?

This is like when the humans blacken the sky in the Matrix to defeat the machines. Yeah it wrecked the earth, but is also didn’t defeat them and they just found something else to exploit.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mihies@programming.dev 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Polluting atmosphere doing so.

[–] youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That’s fair but unfortunately nothing compared to the pollution from launching them

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Which is also nothing compared to a slew of other pollution sources

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

Don't count on it. These things don't just zip along in their orbits. LEO is crowded. They have to maneuver to avoid collisions... a lot.

Over the past six months, Starlink satellites have been increasingly performing collision avoidance maneuvers. According to a report filed by SpaceX with the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC), SpaceX broadband satellites were forced to avoid more than 25 thousand times from December 1, 2022 to May 31, 2023. And since their launch in 2019, the total number of maneuvers has reached 50 thousand.

If Starlink or any other mega-constellation company loses control of their satellites for any reason, there could be collisions. A recent study (Note: PDF) suggests that a sufficiently powerful CME could cause a runaway Kessler Syndrome in as little as 2.8 days if the loss of control lasts that long.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 78 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Elon Musk is such a goddamned literal supervillain that he managed to make the theme of Firefly wrong.

Apparently, they can take the sky from you.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Ads on the fucking moon are going to do it for me.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MuteDog@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago (8 children)

They might put a million satellites into orbit, but they're certainly not going to be orbital data centers. At least not as we currently understand data centers. The idea that space is cold and therefore a great place to put data centers that get hot is the idea of a stoned moron talking out of their ass. Space is a vacuum, you know what else is a vacuum, the part of your portable coffee mug that keeps your beverage warm or cold for ages, because vacuum is a crazy good insulator. Just because space is cold doesn't mean the heat from an orbital data center can dissipate into it. This dumb idea is never going to happen unless data canter technology improves to the point where they aren't environmental disasters anymore.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 54 points 1 week ago (20 children)

I was a space kid, followed every space shot since 1965, was a super fan of Apollo 11, I had a subscription to Nat Geo growing up, just for the Space photos.

So I can't believe I'm saying this: Maybe we've gone far enough for now, and we should have a moratorium on space for the next 50 years.

We should concentrate on Earth for awhile, dontcha think?

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Billionaires don't give a fuck about anyone but themselves, not even their kids. And, we've all agreed to let billionaires run the world, it seems.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] vane@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] TransNeko@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Welcome to SpaceX where we provide a garenteed night sky view that is simply to die for. Subscribe now to enjoy your favorite night sky. Subscribe now for a lower price than normal. Remember, Subscription to SpaceX's night sky is mandated by USA law. Those who don't subscribe will be executed as Traitors and Terrorists. SpaceX's Night Sky experience normally costs $399 per day but if you subscribe in the next 30 seconds using the following code (insert code here) you can enjoy SpaceX's Night Sky for just $99.99 a day. subscribe now. Terms and conditions apply. SpaceX is not responsible for any propery damage, injuries, and/or deaths related to SpaceX satellites falling from orbit. Prices scale based on your race and gender with White men receiving a 100% discount.

[–] Tim_Bisley@piefed.social 37 points 1 week ago

They did a previous study on what 65,000 satellites would look like and that was pretty bleak. Also this bit:

Latitudes near 50° Will Experience the Worst Light Pollution.

Thats a large chunk of Europe.

[–] THE_GR8_MIKE@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well that wannabe nazi took everything else, so why not the sky?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought they couldn't take the sky from me!

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We haven't even finished burning the sky and boiling the sea!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] redsand 26 points 1 week ago
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

There are roughly 15,000 total at the moment ? I wonder what that will do to animals and insects lives.

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

is already so bad. i do astro timelapses and it's all you see anymore. they stand out so much now, if the quantity gets 100x'd it'll be a nightmare.

it will blot out the stars...

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There aren’t many animals or insects in low-earth orbit though, thankfully.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah but they use the light to navigate too. They use this planet too.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Now we just need to invent the Wall-E bot... We're getting so close!

[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

everything the tech bros touch, dies

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 11 points 1 week ago

He never respected his fellow man, why start now?

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

Maybe it's time to crowdsource a satellite killing satellite.

[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 9 points 1 week ago

Down with the space clankers

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›