this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
928 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

83295 readers
5269 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZMoney@lemmy.world 46 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Don't fall for the clickbait reporting here. Musk has a history of making comically exaggerated claims. There won't be a million satellites just like there wasn't a 4000 km/h train, self-driving tunnel network, intercontinental rocket transport or Mars colony.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

But there will be more satellites, and not just from SpaceX. They are already disturbing astronomers work, and it will only get worse.

There was no real debate about whether the world population is ok with it. Big corp has money, big corp acts for its interest and nothing else.

And I'm not denying the benefits of low-orbit satellites and having vast but lowly populated areas at last getting access to a fast Internet. I'm jùst pointing out that this whole thing is happening mostly out of control (or very very few control).

If you add that now international laws was shot and its body discarded in the toilet, also note that getting too much dependent on these satellites makes you very vulnerable to a military strike. I have no doubt that Russia, China and other countries (Iran?) are actively working on satellites destruction, with or without creating debris and giving us a Kessler syndrom. If you look at climate change, on-going life mass extinction, water scarcity, etc. there is little doubt that world leaders will make the worst possible decisions in the name of pragmatism (or religion, but it doesn't really matter).

[–] ZMoney@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The problem is that we offloaded "world leadership" to a bunch of ultra-rich sociopaths who only care about their own profit maximization. And they then made actual profit obsolete, since the only product they produce now is hype in the service of inflationary speculative assets. From a planetary perspective it looks like the human species is committing suicide.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

Of all the permanent and irreparable things big corporations are doing to our world, I struggle to really put this high up. Yeah it sucks, but it provides a useful service and they naturally degrade. If anything Im more worried about all the pollution from them burning up in the atmosphere. If they stop launching them, the sky will be clear within the deccade.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Literally nearly ever claim and promise from Elmo has been a lie so far, no idea why anyone believes this conman

He literally is a billionaire because he lies. Literally.

He is incompetent as fuck, he's a drug junkie, yet still there are so many people who look up to this shit stain

[–] Didntdoit71@feddit.online 3 points 6 days ago

God, you sound like me. We should start a religion. CHURCH OF THE ANTI-ELMO.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

It's still infuriating that he could theoretically make the WALL-E earth a reality

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This is how the night sky looks right now:

It's crazy to think that all this will be privately owned by ultra rich techno-fascists that are beyond any democratic control.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You know what they aren't beyond?

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

lmao I'm on PC and that gif takes up the entire screen in my notifications. Beautiful.

As much as I love the elegance of guillotines though, I do believe that we should use something a little more emblematic of the American working class... and which permits a feet-first approach:

[–] Didntdoit71@feddit.online 16 points 6 days ago

Elon Musk is a plague upon the human condition. Our best hope in the US, right now, is that a Starship launch goes horribly right and hits the White House during a cabinet meeting with Elmo as a a guest. Burn it black...pave over it and start over. Preferably after a mandatory prison-raping of all billionaires, especially those who loved Epstein. Fuck em all...let god sort em out.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 10 points 6 days ago (6 children)

If this actually happens, I will dedicate my life to getting the funding to create a laser weapon that can shoot them out of the sky from Earth.

Then we'll play Space Invaders for keeps.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Bieren@lemmy.today 10 points 6 days ago

Don’t get mad. Think of the shareholders.

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Now I'm curious. Can a satellite fly over a country without permission? I know that an aircraft can't. How far up from the Earth's surface does sovereignity end?

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

However high they can shoot

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

There are international rules though i'm not sure either, if 50 Km or less or more.

[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

List of Starlink and Starshield Launches - Wikipedia

~10,000 Satellites currently orbiting right now, and that's just Starlink.

Check out the list of launches under "Falcon 9 Launches > Starlink Launches." It's every other day now (sometimes consecutive days) that they launch another rocket, and each payload is carrying 20 to 60 satellites.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Starlink is 2/3rds of all satellites. They add 5-6 per day, lose one per day.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

We’re creating our own “Mini Kuiper Belt”. By the time we’re ready to make interplanetary space travel a practical thing (intriguing but doubtful given present circumstances and trajectory) there will be so much space shit that it’ll be as dangerous as trying to land a plane in the United States today!

[–] uenticx@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Their CIDR ranges are also fucking ripe with hacked devices and criminals. 98% of connections from their 153./8 are all fucking bots.

[–] kungen@feddit.nu 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What 153./8? You mean the allocated 153.66.0.0/15? But yeah, I wouldn't be surprised, they probably don't care about abuse reports and it's more difficult to pinpoint a specific customer due to CGNAT.

At least they provide a nice list of ranges you could block.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pharceface@retrolemmy.com 4 points 6 days ago

Rather than just run some fucking cable like we already have for the grid. It’s determined that we should put a bunch of future space junk into our atmosphere. Even more frustrating is that we can’t recover anything from them, all the resources being wasted on something we can’t even recycle.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

Monty Burns approves.

load more comments
view more: next ›