this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
1167 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

83295 readers
5320 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

It says Google will already fight the lawsuit and zuckerberg wants to as well, lmao and he says he wants to protect children but he won't even admit fault with victims? Asshole. There's literally a docu about it: Molly vs the machines.

The two companies probably have to pay more than 3 million dollars. In the next phase of the trial, the jury examines the so-called punitive damages. These are additional damages, intended as an additional penalty.

And because of this instagram will also remove end-to-end encryption and add age-verification

The New Mexico case also raised concerns that allowing teens to use end-to-end encryption on Instagram chats — a privacy measure that blocks anyone other than sender and receiver from viewing a conversation — could make it harder for law enforcement to catch predators. Midway through trial, Meta said it would stop supporting end-to-end-encrypted messaging on Instagram later this year.

Regarding the encryption decision, a Meta spokesperson told CNN that, “very few people were opting in to end-to-end encrypted messaging in DMs, so we’re removing this option from Instagram in the coming months. Anyone who wants to keep messaging with end-to-end encryption can easily do that on WhatsApp.”

-- https://edition.cnn.com/2026/03/24/tech/meta-new-mexico-trial-jury-deliberation

In May, Judge Bryan Biedscheid is slated to hold a trial without a jury on the state's claims that Meta created a public nuisance that harmed state residents' health and safety. The state will ask Biedscheid to direct Meta to make changes to its platforms, including adding effective age verification and removing predators, it said Tuesday.

-- https://www.msn.com/en-us/crime/general/meta-ordered-to-pay-375-million-in-new-mexico-trial-over-child-exploitation-user-safety-claims/ar-AA1ZkHhq

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

instagram will [...] add age-verification

Judge Bryan Biedscheid is slated to hold a trial without a jury on the state’s claims that Meta created a public nuisance that harmed state residents’ health and safety. The state will ask Biedscheid to direct Meta

Listen, I cannot wait for the day that everyone stops using Meta products and Mark Zuckerberg is turned into longpork wagyu in his stolen-land Hawaiian bunker, but the latter statement does not seem to support the initial claim.

I wouldn't hold my breath for any changes which will meaningfully impact the profitability of Meta.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

The New Mexico court heard how Meta’s 2023 decision to encrypt Facebook Messenger – its direct messaging platform, which predators have used as a tool to groom minors and exchange child abuse imagery – blocked access to crucial evidence of these crimes.

Encryption! These monsters!

In the next phase of the legal proceedings, due to begin on 4 May, the attorney general’s office will seek additional financial penalties and court-mandated changes to Meta’s platforms that “offer stronger protections for children”, said Torrez.

The design feature changes the state is seeking include “enacting effective age verification, removing predators from the platform, and protecting minors from encrypted communications that shield bad actors”.

And when that happens, the headline lemmings here will call it enshittification and call for even harsher rules.

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You're telling me we shouldn't have trusted a sentient Annabelle doll in a t-shirt and jeans with the safety of defenseless children? Is THAT what you're telling ME!? ... Well, yeah, actually, that makes a lot of sense.

[–] darklamer@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago

So they want us to believe that the company that knowingly profited from genocide in Myanmar also knowingly profited from child exploitation? Really? OK then, I can believe that.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

So why do managers who ignore staff warnings always get off Scott free?

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

If we can keep getting these assholes in front of juries, maybe something will change.

[–] FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brem@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Go figure, a company that exploits habits is found guilty of exploiting children....

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He's got those Trumpian reverse raccoon eyes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] andybytes@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago

People just need to get off these platforms. Enless I can just pop off I don't want what you got and these techno turdz can eat my arse. Facebook needs to die along with roblox

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 1 week ago

“We respectfully disagree with the verdict and will appeal. We work hard to keep people safe on our platforms and are clear about the challenges of identifying and removing bad actors or harmful content,” said a Meta spokesperson. “We will continue to defend ourselves vigorously, and we remain confident in our record of protecting teens online.” Internal Meta documents and testimony obtained by the New Mexico department of justice during the litigation revealed that both company employees and external child safety experts repeatedly warned about risks and harmful conditions on Meta’s platforms. Evidence presented to the jury included details of the 2024 arrest of three men charged with sexually preying on children through Meta’s platforms, and attempting to meet up with them. This was part of a sting investigation operated by undercover agents and dubbed “Operation MetaPhile” by the attorney general’s office.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

The robot is tired.

[–] uenticx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The details of evasion tactics they used where even harder to read. How fucking irresponsible and outright fucked up do you have to be to OK this shit. Wow.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

look, if the children didn't want to become victims then why did they make themselves so sexy

-- Meta defense (probably)

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›