this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
99 points (96.3% liked)

News

36889 readers
2829 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Earlier this month, the Texas Department of State Health Services released regulations on consumable hemp-derived THC products that will go into effect on March 31. These new regulations include child-resistant packaging, a significant increase in licensing fees, new labeling, testing, and bookkeeping requirements. The rules also codify the legal purchasing age to 21, which went into effect last year as an emergency directive.

However, hemp retailers say the regulation that decreases the amount of total THC in products they sell to 0.3% will eliminate popular smokeable hemp products, such as rolled joints and smokeable flower buds, which make up more than 50% of some stores’ inventories.

...

The rules also increase licensing fees for manufacturers of hemp-derived THC from $258 to $10,000 per facility and retail registrations from $155 to $5,000, which industry leaders say will fulfill the ban by forcing businesses to close.

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 68 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Republicans have done nothing but mess with Texas for the last thirty years.

[–] fulcrummed@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

My understanding was that Texas is explicitly the one State not to be messed with.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 12 points 1 week ago

"Don't Mess With Texas" was an anti-litter campaign and nothing else.

That's what they SAY, but they also SAY States Rights when the federal government is trying to limit how bigoted and abusively states behave, but not when states are trying to limit how bigoted and abusively the federal government is allowed to behave within their borders.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 0 points 1 week ago

Can't say we didn't warn 'em.

Even its own flag rates it one star!

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder if this is the type of mess "Don't Mess with Texas" referred to.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Its a warning not to mess with them as in "don't be like them" with their messy leadership style.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What has happened over the past few years in Texas regarding THC is amazing. Weed is available everywhere. Compared to regulated states like Colorado, it was the wild west. It took the state legislature 3 sessions (6 years) to finally pass a bill trying to make THC illegal again, and Abbott vetoed it.

Well, I'm not happy about these new regulations, which basically make smokeable flower illegal and impose new fees that are certain to put quite a few small shops out of business, however most THC products are going to be remaining on the market, and we're still going to be able to legally order everything that's been banned through the mail, which I consider a huge win in this state.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I know a lot of people who were growers, pushers, or just users back in the grey market days and none of them seem too pressed about going back if they had to. Some of them desperately want the governments nose out of it all together. I know it's not the ideal for the average person, but I hope that type of tenacity from parts of the marijuana community can help keep it strong for all the people who never had to or never could use less than legal means. No one not holding stock in the companies wants to go back to heavy pharmaceutical solutions when there's a plant right there.

[–] skooma_king@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Is this just the lab derived delta-8/9 stuff or is it actually THCa (real bud) as well?

[–] protist@retrofed.com 3 points 1 week ago

Real bud has been for sale in Texas for years now and has been completely unregulated. This regulation imposed by the Dept of State Health Services effectively kills the sale of the real stuff in stores by counting THCa in the total THC equation, which was not counted before. Lab derived stuff will still be for sale

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Cannabis with 0.3% THC and less is actually really nice to smoke. You get a nice body sensation like you're going to get high but you stay sober. But it sucks for everyone who likes to smoke, because they're not going to like it very much.

In California low THC flower like this isn't legal. They're only allowed to sell high potency THC flower. Pretty stupid