this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
603 points (91.7% liked)

Technology

83251 readers
3422 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

Reject the age verification.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Feels like something systemd can solve with a compile time flag. Either have it on or off depending on if you want to legally sell it in those areas or not and away you go.

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago

Give an inch they'll take a mile.I see your instance is UK, so I assume you don't understand how utterly insane US lawmakers are right now.

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I am aware of the Orwellian privacy implication, but how do we deal with bots, now that AI is rampant?

Something like hashcash, or what?

[–] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Some type CAPTCHA type puzzle. Maybe ask users how many Rs are in ‘strawberry’ before they can proceed

[–] how_we_burned@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

to play a game of paper scissor rock. Most chatbot try to play (without any understanding of how pointless it is). Anything that tries to play straight away is automatically a bot.

[–] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

Play a game of rock paper scissors with me

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 days ago

Not sure what is worse:

  1. The political fight re: should the OS store your age at all. (Linux will be illegal because they didn't bend).
  2. The political fight re: should OSes be required to verify your age / identity?

To me, fighting at step 1 has the advantage of keeping the infrastructure from getting built, and the disadvantage of people saying "well, actually, there's nothing concerning or new here."

Fighting at step 2 has the advantage of being a clearer threat, but a disadvantage since the prior infrastructure has been built, society has adapted it, and politicians say "think of the children."

I feel like it is more strategic to fight at every step.

[–] Blemgo@lemmy.world 143 points 1 week ago (12 children)

I find that move extremely funny, since it's purely made for sensationalism and nothing else. I mean, if you hate how systems implemented age verification, then why don't you remove its identity verification too, i.e. also optional fields for stuff like your address an e-mail that most users don't even fill out.

There is no mechanism verifying what birth date you type in - you can type whatever date you want and systems doesn't care.

I'd say no matter where you stand with age verification, this is the best solution to handle the situation. After all, any and all age checks we have nowadays are a black box anyways. There is no real knowing how other systems are checking ages, and there is AFAIK no real government mandated rules on how it is verified. They could make you scan your ID's front, back, nuclear composition and dietary preferences and give you a result that is almost, but not quite, entirely unlike a proper age verification procedure.

If the government wants to introduce age verification, they have to do it themselves - build an API that handles the age verification, similar to how the digital ID in Germany works, as an example. If they want proper age verification, they also have to take the blame themselves if things go wrong.

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Nah. What is funny is a pull-request explicitly stating compliance with age verification laws getting merged and then revert refused with a "don't bring this discussion here" argument. This is where Lennart has lost me, with that bullshit of an excuse

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 93 points 1 week ago (12 children)

My line in the sand is when a distro/app starts enforcing entry of birth date data. Having a database field to store it, or even an optional prompt for it isn't the point where I bin it.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›