this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
158 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sometimes they even get rubes to pay for the privilege of being exploited and sold off in marketable pieces, such as 23andMe. doomer

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 41 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Binding arbitration is the frontline of technofeudalism. You are in the digital manor of the House de Arcos Dorado and thus are subject to its private courts.

[–] KurtVonnegut@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago

How long until we see the Hamburgler doing Corvée labor as punishment?

[–] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 37 points 2 years ago (4 children)

If I understand correctly that’s totally unenforceable but the lawyer that wrote it should be put in prison either way

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago

should be put in prison

Walled more like

[–] privatized_sun@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago

lawyers should be put in prison

warren-snake

[–] Grandpa_garbagio@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah it's just a way to get suckers to settle. They'll point at that, say theyll give you some paltry some anyways but if you take us to court they'll throw it out etc, and wash their hands of it all

[–] D3FNC@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

Yeah because the courts lately have really given a rat's ass about "principles" "precedent" and "rules based order"

The thing about the legal system is it's all, every bit of it, completely made up with no rationale behind it other than vibes and aesthetics they use their words to paint to effect. I have a lot of sympathy with people who fall into that sovereign citizen nonsense, from a certain angle it's frequently real hard for me to tell the difference between our court system and Harry Potter.

[–] GarfieldYaoi@hexbear.net 36 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is this why every brand is trying to force you to use an app?

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 47 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This and skimming all sorts of data off your phone

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 17 points 2 years ago

Yeah. They're spying on you and either using the intel for their own r&d, or selling it, or both.

[–] aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Don't worry, tons of paid products also require you to agree to arbitration. I bought a hard drive that had one buried in fine text.

[–] wombat@hexbear.net 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

we may have to start making excuses for the lack of terror

[–] emizeko@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Frank@hexbear.net 18 points 2 years ago

Even coupons read as "it's a trap!" :akbaryelling: to me these days. I wouldnt use the stupid grocery loyalty card if it didn't knock like 30$ off my groceries and i absolutely screamed when i used it the first time and facebook was serving ads for things i just bought by the time i got to my car.

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago

Wait, do they mean that as per the new updated terms and service that you're agreeing to all this even when you don't use the app, or solely when you use the app? They're both bad, but I'd hate to think that if I agreed to some terms and service on a phone app that I give up my rights for life even when I stop using the app.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago

If it's free, you're the product

[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

An Imgur link was detected in your post. Here are links to the same location on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.

[–] DanComrd@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Is that in every region for McDonalds or is this only applies to their North American branches?

[–] JK1348@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

It's a libertarian's wet dream

[–] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

Whichever app gets me more free coffee it's the one i usually use but shit i never even considered they could get me like that.

If this is even a legal contact, would it only apply to lawsuits about transactions that took place with the app involved? Or if I slip walking into one am i no longer allowed to sue because of the app on my phone

[–] Wes_Dev@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How does this effect it's workers?

Say someone who works at McDonald's also has the app, and then the company does something illegal. Does that mean the worker can't sue them?

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago

Probably not. I'd be surprised if working there doesn't have some built in "independent arbitration" clause already.