this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
530 points (97.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

38967 readers
4264 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tartarin@piefed.social 76 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Unless they can reproduce, I don't see the issue here.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago (2 children)

While the medical concerns with incest don't apply here, the stigma of having sexual relations with a relative usually doesn't take such technicalities into account.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Why should the biological stigma matter when the only remaining stigma would have been social?

[–] Trex202@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Homophobia masked as incestphobia (not sure if real word...)

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Power dynamics, access/grooming to family members.

The issue isn't about reproduction, though neither of those would apply in this scenario where we assume they were estranged.

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Seems like none of those apply here though. These two didn't even know they were brothers until they were already together romantically.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

I said that.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm not sure what biological stigma is supposed to mean. Sexual relations between siblings gives most people the ick regardless of technicalities, and that is a social stigma, the only kind of stigma I'm aware of.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think that's all shit we are taught. In highschool there was a brother and sister in the grade above me that were notoriously very clingy with each other and their parents didn't let them take sex ed because that class needed parental sign off and the bible was the only teacher they needed or some stupid shit. Anyway they were seen fucking in the storage room when extra chairs were needed for an event. People just passed it off as twins stuff before, then after it was twins stuff

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yes, these are social norms, and those are taught.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Biological stigma" would refer to the effects of having an incestuous child.

"Social stigma" would refer to the sexual relationship between people in a close familial relationship, which is clearly not the case since they had no prior relationship.

Since these men wouldn't fall under either category, what other stigma is there?

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think we're using the same definition of stigma.

Stigma is a profound, unfair negative belief or stereotype attached to a person or group, causing shame, social rejection, and discrimination.

I'm having a hard time making any of the stuff you're saying make sense with that definition, and the whole word is inherently social.

The fact is that a lot of people think it's nasty to fuck your brother, and that you should stop fucking him when you realize you're related to him. I see the nuance in this situation, but a lot of people don't, and if they maintain the relationship they will have to deal with those people. It's already hard enough to deal with homophobia without this on top.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't understand how you can read that definition and not comprehend my comment. Perhaps you could explain in your own words what the stigma here should be.

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

U/bus_factor means society’s stigma when they say “social stigma”. They are trying to communicate that society is grossed out by all relationships between family - whether they are blood related or not, whether they know each other as family members or not. Any whiff of relatedness is enough to condemn the relationship even if the reasons don’t really make sense. Society finds it gross.

You’re talking about specifically the “don’t fuck someone you grew up with even if they’re not your blood relative” rule, which is a stigma about our social relationships, a “social stigma”, but not what prev was meaning when they used that term.

misread stigma as smegma

[–] basxto@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

Would be still legal in Germany

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 15 points 1 week ago

No inbreeding, no problem

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The issue is the fact they are brothers is on the front page of the newspaper. Hope that helps

[–] nile_istic@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you mean that the issue is the fact that they're brothers or that it's been printed in a newspaper with their faces on? Because if they're two consenting adults, they cannot reproduce with one another, and they didn't grow up as siblings, then I too am struggling to see what the issue is, considering that the usual incest-related issues (inbreeding and consent/coercion issues born of familial bonds/hierarchies) are addressed. Seems the only remaining issue is that it's been publicized, meaning they're liable to get shit on by the people for the rest of their lives for something they weren't aware of, had no control over, and hurts no one.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Seems the only remaining issue is that it's been publicized, meaning they're liable to get shit on by the people for the rest of their lives

That's what I was saying yes

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exactly! I'm sterilized so I don't see an issue with dating my daughter.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is a power imbalance when dating your daughter. Just like a teacher is generally not allowed to date their student. So there is an issue with dating your daughter.

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 week ago (4 children)

So... okay if it's my sister, then?

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 7 points 1 week ago

From a narrow ethical standpoint, there is no issue I can see?

[–] tartarin@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

The point is incestuous relationships were forbidden because they lead a higher probability of genetic defects in the offspring. They were also forbidden if they are not consensual like any other sexual relationships.

Clearly dating your daughter isn't consensual given the imbalance of power at play. That's also why pedophile relationships are forbidden.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

If you started being together not knowing you were siblings, like here, then no.

Super irresponsible of them. Their butt babies are going to be deformed.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 20 points 1 week ago
[–] Stefan_S_from_H@piefed.zip 6 points 1 week ago

I hope they used protection.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] pewpew@feddit.it 2 points 1 week ago

And so what

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

From what I can tell it's less of a shock if they like or play hockey. /s

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Random question for the bi fellas here:

Does gay porn online also have a high percentage of "step" family incestuous stuff? Or is that an exclusively straights problem.

[–] chewables@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It sure does. Step-dads, step-brothers and even step-uncles, as far as the eye can see

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Why though?! Who clicks those videos?!

[–] forestbeasts@pawb.social 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm not straight or bi, but furry, and furry porn has none of that stuff (well, I'm sure it exists if you go looking for it, but it's not like, plastered everywhere).

It's weird hearing about the totally different norms of human porn!

-- Frost

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It definitely exists, but it's rather rare. In the last few years it has expanded; actually today I saw some of it on FA by an artist I watch, and didn't know they drew that. Seems to be mostly father/son, but that might be skewed since I'm gay and follow many accounts that cater to that. Clones too, decent bit and seems to be growing, though slower.

E: cool pfp :3

[–] forestbeasts@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago

re E: thanks!! *wags* My headmate Ylfingr drew it in Inkscape. :3

-- Frost

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago