this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
1868 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

83251 readers
3900 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

I've just ordered a secondhand Pixel 10a to return to GrapheneOS. I stopped using on my Pixel 7 when my banking app stopped working but now I'm going to return and just switch banks.

I've been using a Fairphone 6 for the past few months but it's one of the worst phones I've ever used and simply can't live with it anymore.

[–] mudkip@lemdro.id 2 points 6 days ago

This is the way to fight back against fascist regimes.

[–] bonn2@lemmy.zip 232 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I was wondering when I would see this headline. I wonder if any other big names will make similar statements.

[–] kabe@lemmy.world 105 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I also wonder whether or not grapheneos, or open source Linux OSs in general, will face any repercussions for failing to comply to these regulations due to the relatively low user count.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 109 points 1 week ago (49 children)

Hate to say it but systemd, the init system of most Linux distros, already has PRs with maintainer backing to implement DoB recording.

Some people can't kneel fast enough.

[–] portnull@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 65 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The self-important creator of Systemd has personally blocked that PR, if I'm hearing correctly, which would suggest he or his employer Microsoft is all in on it.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

It's an optional field in the userdb JSON object. It's not a policy engine, not an API for apps. We just define the field, so that it's standardized iff people want to store the date there, but it's entirely optional.

"I'm not picking a side" and "this future proofs standardization" is of little comfort, that is seriously suspect. I ought to look to alternatives to SystemD(odge the issue failed).

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So in other words, "Sure we built the people-crushing machines, but we didn't wire them up or turn them on."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

That has already been closed

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago

Maybe this'll take the shine off that wunderkinder mess and people will finally be free to choose something more reliable. I love how RH pushed this beta software so hard and my reboots are now just shite -- unreliable and occasionally ridiculously delayed.

I'll be glad to see the back of that metastatic shitball.

load more comments (47 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TheLastOfHisName@piefed.social 64 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

Linux Distros (so far) Refusing Age Verification

EDIT
I recommend going to Ageless Linux's site and reading up on their take on the whole issue. They clearly illustrate how poorly thought out the California law is.

If a child uses your computer, you are required by § 1798.501(a)(1) to provide "an accessible interface at account setup" that collects their age. The adduser command does not ask for your age. We recommend not thinking about this.

Based

[–] PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social 25 points 1 week ago

I think this might be the first and only time I'll ever see Omarchy getting upvotes on this site.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Genuine question:

is Graphene a "big name"? They talk a big game and are probably one of the biggest alternative phone OSes but all results I can find are putting them at 250k users and less than 2% of the Android market share.

But, more importantly: Do they at all care about US government contracts? Red Had have RHEL. ubuntu have whatever they call their premium OS for enterprise users. Google and Apple are obvious.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] voluble@lemmy.ca 208 points 1 week ago (6 children)

"If GrapheneOS devices can't be sold in a region due to their regulations, so be it."

Wonder if Motorola feels the same way.

[–] Flipper@feddit.org 121 points 1 week ago (14 children)

They can just sell their normal phone. As long as the user is able to run the installer it doesn't really matter.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

During prohibition era, there was a brick of dried grapes being sold as a nutrition supplement or something like that, but it had a "warning" sticker attached saying specifically not to dissolve it in a specific quantity of water, and if that were to happen, do not let a specific quantity of yeast to fall in it, and especially not to let it sit for 6 weeks, or else you might end up with wine, which is forbidden!

I can see a cheeky sort of company selling a phone with a little warning label attached to it.....

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] aproposnix@scribe.disroot.org 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lol. The US is not the only market.

[–] PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social 46 points 1 week ago (8 children)

And the US isn't the only place pulling this shit.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 91 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good. Put that energy into a moderate parental control education fund or something. The ID gating the net is only for control.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 66 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Now if only GrapheneOS was easy to install on cheap Android devices.

[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 68 points 1 week ago (3 children)

They have reached a deal with Motorola, so hopefully there will be more options soon. You can get we used pixels pretty cheap though, and the installation process is very easy.

[–] CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I was wondering how this stance will impact that deal. A large company like Motorola would typically seek to comply with laws such as these

[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm hoping they already had the discussion with Motorola about it. I'm assuming Motorola wouldn't be on the hook legally since Graphene is the OS provider. I could be wrong though.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 week ago

Yeah, hopefully worst case, Motorola just doesn't ship them with Graphene (which could be a security risk anyway). Then they'd be off the hook.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Grapheneos is surprisingly the most easy OS to install... The issue is most phone manufacturer's dont meet Grapheneos its standards.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Cheap android devices don't have the proper security hardware. Hopefully the Motorola phone is cheaper than a pixel though. Used pixels are also pretty cheap, all things considered.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 54 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's about time I flash that onto my pixel 6 pro.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] eru@mouse.chitanda.moe 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

this is why its a poggers operating system

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 week ago

This is the only correct response. Middle finger.

[–] richardwallass@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 week ago

Good boys !

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

CA's law is "per child". I guarantee lawyers are foaming at the mouth to claim every child in CA was hurt so they can line their pockets. CA's public protection laws seem to be for the purposes of enriching lawyers. I'd love to see how many class action suits would get filed if lawyer fees were put under a hard cap.

[–] Archr@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

"lawyers" can't bring charges for this law. Only the AG. If people don't like what the AG is doing then they can just start a recall election.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They have partnered with motorola too right? Basedbasedbasedbased

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (5 children)

If the US government bans Graphene, Motorola will drop them in 1/1000th of a heartbeat.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (7 children)

The rest of the planet may have something to say on that front. There IS more to the world than naziland.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] versionc@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (23 children)

I'm gonna have to replace my phone soon since it doesn't receive security updates any more and I was thinking of going for GrapheneOS. What do you guys think about getting a Pixel 10 for that purpose? My second choice would be an iPhone but it's both a lot more expensive and also less privacy respecting.

I was also considering a Fairphone but despite rating the repariability highly, there were too many other cons to the device.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] tackleberry@thelemmy.club 19 points 1 week ago

The surviving members of the Epstein community want to know for sure they are chatting with children when they pick their next targets.

load more comments
view more: next ›