this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
261 points (97.8% liked)

Greentext

8036 readers
981 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 99 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Is this helldivers? The game where half of a planet’s population is forcibly turned into bug fuel every few years?

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 99 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Theres a reoccuring problem with bigly brained thinkers where they omit all the terrible shit and look at only what the propaganda wants them to. Even in a game this remains true.

[–] tomenzgg@midwest.social 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Most clips from Starship Troopers on YouTube have filled comments' sections with people waxing about how based the society is and it's actually a utopia (to your point).

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well the movie elimanted the entire opening sequence of the book where they are just being terrorists in their super space suits (which the movie also did not include). I think that was necessary to drive the point home.

[–] Deme@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I've heard that the book was sincere jingoism, which the director of the movie didn't like one bit and turned it into clever satire of fascism instead? Haven't read it, but the movie is great, even if there's a bunch if idiots on both sides (fascist and antifascists) thinking that it's sincere.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Heinlein was...rather directionless on his politics. I think it was Clarke that once remarked that Heinlein's politics depended on who he was sleeping with - which is why you get weird whiplash from the anti-governance free-love (and incest and racism) in Methuselah's Children and Farnham's Freehold to a full throated defense of utopian fascism in Starship Troopers.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 9 points 1 week ago

A lot of people I've met would honestly happily take a 50% chance to be sacrificed to ensure that those who aren't chosen live a happy life. I have no doubt that they'd think that right up until they're actually chosen, then they'd scream bloody murder about how unfair it is.

[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 97 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

They started an unprovoked three front war, prioritize citizens differently based on a state defined class system, got the earth blown up on at least one occasion, use their soldiers as disposable cannon fodder, and send everyone who disagree with them to reeducation camps. Other than that its a swell place.

Its tiring how bad general media literacy is that I can't tell if the 4chan post above is a joke.

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The 4chan post probably is a joke.

The problem is, with a lot of their jokes, other users can't tell, so it becomes reality. See also, basically everything wrong with the US and MAGA idiots today.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I've seen one Lemmy bigbrain recently argue that even when artists are showing mafia or army to be terrible for people in them, they romanticize the mafia and army nonetheless, and that in general media glorifies its subject matter regardless of the author's intent. This schmuck would probably say with a straight face that ‘Helldivers’, or whatever this post is about, actually advocates for its model of utopia even if it pretends not to.

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The idea of there being no anti-war films is older than Lemmy. The problem is Poe's Law related. You can make a movie or a game that shows the horror of war or the tyranny of distopian totalitarian regimes, but regardless of the intended message, your creation is filtered through your audience's lenses of perception, and some of that audience has been raised to be white supremacists, some have been through schooling that acts more as indoctrination than education, and some of that audience are just seriously fucking stupid.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] affenlehrer@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Where does this lore come from? I've never heard of super earth

[–] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Helldivers games

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] archonet@lemy.lol 59 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"amazing quality of life"

Sure, if you're the right kind of super citizen.

[–] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yea, when choosing a fictional world to aspire for, it's useful to consider how most citizens are treated.

Our current world is great too, for some.

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anon is probably the kind of person who also thinks Sparta was great, and just disregards that 90% of the population there were slaves.

[–] archonet@lemy.lol 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

seems more likely, being it's 4chan; that they're 100% aware and in-favor of the slaves, just that they believe they'll always be in that lucky 10%. Same goes for idolizing Super Earth -- it's never them that'll be sent to a freedom camp, until it happens, it's always something that happens to someone else who "probably deserved it"

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

let's use the veil of ignorance for this one - when choosing a model society to aspire for pretend you have no idea where you'll be placed in it. maybe 80% is doing decently, 5% is doing well, and 15% is doing really bad, are you ready to potentially become a part of the 15%? if not, let's find a different model

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Given how many people are willing to bet their money on far worse odds, I think an 85% chance of winning is a bet a lot of people would be willing to take.

[–] new_world_odor@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

no racism

white af family is the only visible race

Yeahhhh no fucking thanks.

[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 45 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The helldiver's two launch cutscene does show an interracial couple in a state propaganda video. Racism is one of the few ways the game doesn't to my knowledge show the government being fucked up. Everything else is horrible though

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I saw some blog call it woke because of that lamo

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The helldivers also have randomized skin colour, so soldiers of all races can become elite troops.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"elite troops"? You haven't met my teammates.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

I think Helldivers have about the same rate of friendly fire as Navy Seals, and they probably write less books about it.

[–] Lauchmelder@feddit.org 15 points 1 week ago

I mean TBF we have a sample size of one family here, but also idk what this post is about so idk idk

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

Can't be racism if there's only one race

[–] vodka@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

If there is only one race, racism can't exist? 🤔

[–] Complexicate@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

There is only one human race, and racism still exists.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago

This post is approved by the ministry of truth

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

no racism (no blacks, Asians, jews)

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isn't the one character who greets you when you return from a mission black? Or am I misremembering.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Oh, this is from a game?

I thought it was some random channers wet dream

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Here's the game's intro

It perfectly captures the parody vibes in the game.

Over the top propaganda is oozing out of every hole of this game. It's great

Haven't played in about a year, and the intro really makes me want to fire it up again

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Helldivers. A game which applies over the top levels of sarcastic propaganda for the managed democracy of Super Earth. In the game, you play as a footsoldier (helldiver) for Super Earth. Hence, the whole culture around the game is soaked with sarcastic propaganda.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You don't play as A helldiver. You play as as many helldivers as it takes to complete the mission. They literally throw people at the problem until it stops being a problem.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

Coincidentally, that is the cure for Racism that racists prescribe too. Huh, neat.

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 8 points 1 week ago

Can't have racism if there is only one race.

Rollsafe.gif

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I get the feeling that this anon would read A Brave New World and have an issue with it being labeled dystopian fiction.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Even the author of BNW wasn't sure of the world really was a dystopia or not. A lot of people do seem to have a lot of freedom, and most seem happy (or at least, not unhappy). Sure, a lot of questionable things have been done to achieve that goal, but if 99% is happy with their life; can it really be a dystopia?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nicolauz@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I once had a multiple hour long discussion with someone who claimed it's clearly a utopia... Free drugs, sex without consequences, guaranteed job,...

Freedom is for suckers apparently.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

To be fair, I always considered Brave New World a much less dire dystopy than 1984. I mean you have a really hard time arguing otherwise. People are not free in either but if you could choose, don't tell me you'd choose 1984.

But this debate is moot anyway, what we are heading towards is a combination of the worst of 1984 and Brave New World combined.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have always liked that 1984 and A Brave New World are sort of dystopian companion pieces because they explore opposite sides of the spectrum of societies where free will is being suppressed. It has been a minute since I read both, but to me it's a mistake to compare them in terms of which version is worse to live in because yeah, 1984 would win that competition on the surface.

For me, when it comes to A Brave New World, the scary part is the idea of pleasure being used as a weapon to make people apathetic to the world around them and to thinking. There is something so incredibly sinister about this level of pleasure based compliance because there will be people who look at it on the surface and go: it's not so bad. Could be worse.

And it could. It can always be worse. I'm pretty sure that everybody would agree that 1984 is a better world to live in than the world of The Road. It's all relative.

But it's the idea that someone could read A Brave New World or a similar dystopia that disguises itself as a utopia, and ignore the warning signs and think it's fine. Because that, to me, means that such a world would be easier to implement. If people comply willingly, get lulled into that life and just let it happen because it feels good, is conventient and makes their dopamine go bzzt, then there is no need to use force. It's also why several aspects of A Brave New World has become more real in today's world than 1984 has. We have all walked right into it and we stay there because apathy and the nature of convenience and pleasure is something we don't want to give up. In 1984, they want to change the system, but fail. In A Brave New World they behold the outsider who tries to scream sense into them like he's an exotic animal and they do not care to understand his points because to do so would demand effort and hard work for the reward of a free life.

In my country we recently banned smart phones in all schools because the signs of longterm apathy towards learning has started to show in younger generations. Why should they put effort into their homework and assignments when they can get their dopamine hit on tiktok and snapchat with the snap of a finger? In adults in my country, the sense of community and togetherness has dwindled partially because we spend out free time on the phone and don't get bored enough to get together with our neighbors. There's a bit more to it than that, among other things that we outsourced child and eldercare to the state, so we don't really need each other like we used to.

In the world we currently live in, I think it is very important that we keep in mind that if we make everything easy and we waste our time on distractions that doesn't challenge or build us up, we will become apathetic and easier to control. I'm not talking about the state either. Those who control us are the tech giants and everyone who support them in order to steal our attention and time to waste it on additive, shallow nonsense all so companies can sell you stupid shit through ads.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Big “The Imperium of Man are actually the good guys” energy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Ask the IRL Christians how the nuclear family shit is going. No shortage of cheating and drug abuse happening, I bet

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

wouldnt a superearth have a much higher gravity, which humans cant survive anyways,

[–] X@piefed.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

they’re talking about Super Earth, a fictional polity, and not a super-Earth, a type of exoplanet

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›