this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
26 points (93.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

47442 readers
1484 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In Brazil, all capitals have vet programs with free sterilization and in the favelas I lived (Vidigal and Tijuquinha in RJ) they had vets that grew up there and open they clinic there and were really affordable, I guess is the same in other favelas too. For surgeries and more complex procedures there were popular clinics that were cheap.

[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 19 points 1 week ago

What's missing in "rich countries" I think is the village pet. Loads of places have dogs and cats just roam around and people feed them leftovers and such. People care about them as much as any one would a pet, but no one out right owns the animal.

[–] searabbit@piefed.social 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think people who grow up middle class in a first world country are so sheltered from suffering that animal cruelty is the first example of it that they can actually empathize with and understand as a black and white issue (to them). Unfortunately, suffering is just a fact of life for everyone but the most privileged. The logical conclusion to "if you can't give animals the standard of care that I expect as a global top 1%er of wealth, then you shouldn't own any pets" is a PETA type policy of killing any pet that is living a suboptimal existence. Which, if they were humans, we would consider that genocide. It's really just not a reasonable stance at all.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

All we can do is provide the best care we can and give them the best life we can provide

[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No one should be judged for anything anywhere when it comes to money

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So not judging billionaires? Feels like your statement was a bit too broad

[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why should I judge a billionaire? I don't care about them......

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Because being a billionaire is only possible by keeping other people poor enough that poorer people have to let the billionaires make money from the work of the poors.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because billionaires are not just minding their own business, they are setting the rules for you.

[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No one is setting rules for me. Lmao wtf does that even mean? Yeah dude. Bill Gates called me yesterday to say I can own a 4 cylinder engine

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Billionaires have power over national governments. Of course Bill Gates won't call you, why would he do that?

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe, but as far as things the rich countries have that poor countries don't - pet care is pretty low on the list of things to rectify imo

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I asked because my parents are like "pets that get sick should just get tossed into the trash so they don't infect us" lol

[–] UnrefinedChihuahua@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They grew up in poverty and dealt with famines in a post-WW2 war-torn nation.

[–] UnrefinedChihuahua@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Not taking to the vet" and "tossing in the trash" are miles apart.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I mean for perspective... people in my grandma's generation would just eat the cat before they got too old.

Kinda like livestock... with a dual purpose of pest control...

And before westerners starts sterotyping... reminder again that this is a war-torn country devastated by japanese imperialism and famines were common.

[–] DireTech@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Makes sense in that environment. If someone doesn’t have at least one grandparent that endured some shit then their family lived a very fortunate life. Or more likely didn’t pass down stories of just how bad things got.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Even that's still a very different scenario. Survival for you/your family, vs intentionally dooming a defenseless, sick pet to a slow, painful death (or laughing about it, in your case). That's not a Western stereotype, that's basic human compassion and empathy.

In your first example, euthanasia is far better than "tossing a sick pet in the trash". Obviously. Anywhere in the world, no matter the poverty level, there's cheap, quick, humane ways of ending an animals life. And yes, I would do it personally, if I had to. Intentionally choosing suffering over a quick end is wrong.

[–] vividspecter@aussie.zone -2 points 1 week ago

I consider pet ownership to be too widespread in general because it causes a massive drain on resources (and on local wildlife) while we are in a climate crisis. An even in richer countries, pets are often neglected by their owners causing widespread suffering to the pets themselves.

And I say this as someone that likes and gets on with cats and dogs; I just think there are too many of them.

[–] stephen@lazysoci.al -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I want a WASP-y Vegan to reply.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Dogs can eat a vegan diet, they're not obligate carnivores.