It's a very racialized term masquerading as a neutral one, with a "definition" that is secondary to its actual meaning, which is to liken to a character of the Terrorist who is like a Halloween monster. It dehumanizes its target into a completely irrational monster, who you can then say did any nonsensical evil thing you can come up with and people will believe you.
chapotraphouse
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank
I've known new athiests that call Muslims in general uncivilised and of a lesser culture
at some point mark my words someone is going to start up colonial mission trips for new athiesm
you just lost your lathe privileges
Ask him:
"Oh really? Does that include Andrew Tate? Perhaps also a sizable portion of US republicans
Watch him short-circuit.
no he doesn't like them either
"Thug" goes in the middle somewhere
Any time someone says "terrorists" I just stop listening to them. It's an incredible cudgel for them to wield though. Look how easy it is for even a dope like Santos to just keep ringing that bell to completely shut down discussion.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
requisite clip
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiqnN6EU3Q0
terrorism is acceptable when all options for peaceful settlement have been foreclosed
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Yes but to be clear it's been like that for at least 50 years.
Similarly, the west uses "democratic" like they used to use "civilized", although they never really stopped doing that one either
Has been a buzzword since the 2000s