A fake christian who just uses it to manipulate. I'm not christian but I recognize a manipulator and the soft brained snowflakes who blindly follow anyone making the right grunts and hoots of their faith.
this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
355 points (99.7% liked)
politics
29181 readers
3737 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
My brother in Baphomet, they're all fake. Religion exists solely to manufacture consent for authority. That's it.
Religion, government, business, a non profit, it doesn't matter what it is, people will assume a position of authority in whatever power structure that has space, and corrupt it. It's not unique to religion. It's only because religion has been corrupted by people desiring power, that people hate religion. But in that same vein, the fight should be about dismantling power structures and creating equality. Which, would be in line with some religions, ironically.
No, in your list only religious people told me I was going to hell when I was 12 because I wouldn’t disown my lesbian parents. The kind of corruption and evil entitlement that people get is indeed unique to religion.
Nope, my MAGA coworker hates gay people and is staunchly Athiest.
Ask him if he's also pro life? If he is he has to support gay people. They get less abortions than anyone!
I'm sure he'd pivot away to something else, considering that he pivoted from talking about trans rights to try and say "I shouldn't have to worry about walking with my daughters down the street and walking into two dudes making out." Basically suggesting that gay and trans people are the source of moral decay in the U.S.
The guy is the literal poster child of boomer moral decay, by the way. Digustingly obese, entitled, racist, MAGA.
To be fair, I wasn't being serious. That's a Cliff Cash joke
Well, I'm an idiot and sometimes I need help 😂
Your coworker being the religious equivalent of a log cabin Republican doesn’t change anything as far as I can see, the MAGA movement is still fueled by Christian overtones.
The kind of corruption and evil entitlement that people get is indeed unique to religion.
That sure as hell sounds like goalposts shifting to me.
load more comments
(2 replies)
What role did religion play when my sisters ex partner, who was an atheist, beat the shit out of her and raped her? Please explain, as my life experiences are clearly limited.
What does that have to do with anything I said? Nobody was talking about domestic abuse.
I'm sorry, I thought we were interjecting personal experience as conjecture.
In direct response to your original comment, you have proven my point exactly. People who were in a position of power/authority abused it. It doesn't matter what the modus operandi is when the fundamental consequence is the same. People want power, people get it, people abuse it. It's not inherently unique to any one thing in humanity, it's ubiquitous.
You made a list. I was commenting on the list elements vs each other, not anything that wasn’t on the list. My comment was not intended to prove or disapprove any point since yours and mine were both opinions.
No, in your list only religious people...
You started off your comment by saying no. This indicates a negative position. Since you responded to my comment, I can only assume you are taking a negative position against my comment.
Then you followed that position up with anecdotal evidence, not responding to the key position I maintain; that this is not unique to religion, but every structure in which power and positions of authority exist. If it exists, it can be corrupted. Again, modus operandi, does not matter, since that is inherently a key part of my position.
If you were just commenting a personal experience, then why did you start off with, "No"? What is your position in this debate? Because, I am finding myself further, and further lost.
Disagreement isn’t proof or disproof or even an attempt at such. At this time I’m completely lost as to your point. You didn’t say every structure, you made a list and I felt that one of those things was not like the others. That one of those things does have a unique form of evil attached to it. I really don’t understand why you’re trying to add more to this conversation than actually exists.
I did say every structure through inference. You are still disagreeing with me. If you can't see it, so be it. I'm Audi
Ooh, hi Audi, I'm BMW! I also go too fast, and have inscrutable motivation!
haha, thank you for brightening my day!
load more comments
(3 replies)
Chuckles in all religions
Can't miss out if you dedicate yourself to all the religions!
Then you die and find Anubis weighing your heart and he's all "Surprise, Motherfucker!".
And I'm like, "Huh, I figured pirating was gonna weigh something but that seems a little much"
Weighs as much as the bits that are written to disk.
No true Scotsman.
“We’re fighting religious fanatics who seek a nuclear capability in order for some religious Armageddon,” Hegseth said of Iranian leaders. “But from my perspective, I mean, obviously I’m a man of faith who encourages our troops to lean into their faith, rely on God.”
i believe more that he is a man of spirits than faith.
As Johnnie Walker 2:5 says…
Jameson 3:16.
Miller High Life 4:20
3:17, St Pats and all
I think he is projecting what he wants to do: Using American nukes to cause the rapture.
playing the victim card, now in religion flavor
Holy projection... Pretty sure Iran would only want nukes for the protection a country gets by simply having them. I've never heard anything about them wanting nukes for a religious Armageddon.
On the other hand, Hegseth and others have been very fucking clear that this shit is about stupid biblical prophecy.
yeah, it's the pot calling the kettle black on the gospel of nuke.
Just call it like it is. This is a crusade, just not sanctioned by the pope this time.
It's Ya'll-Qaeda's crusade.
Hopefully the crusaders go into the desert, and never return. Alas, the likes of Pete Hegseth wouldn't dare to set foot in any place where he could lose it.
If I recall, the first crusade was called because the Byzantine empire wanted help getting some stuff back from the Turks. Alexius Comnenus just wanted some military assistance, I don't think there were crazy religious undertones at that point (at least not beyond what was normal for that time). Then the Pope got involved and some wackos in Western Europe took things WAY too far.
So we have American Christian zealots and Israeli Jewish zealots together fight Iranian Muslim zealots.
Meanwhile the rest of the world just watches this circus of idiots and wonders how we ever ended up here
Pete Kegsbreath is as Christian as Kenneth Copeland... which is to say exactly nill. It's a facade. They're both exactly opposite of Christian.
Anti-Christ.
I would argue he is more so, but only due to popular demand.
All these millions of Christians who believe what they believe and support them must be fake christians too, huh? Sure is lucky youre here to tell us who is and isnt a real Christian.
That guy is anything but christian...
Wait, is the "Secretary of War" admitting it's a war?
....and he sayeth unto them, "fight no more, you are brothers" was apparently lost on the lowly maggotty species of humanity...
You’re drunk, Hegseth.
Whenever I hear some "leader" start extolling any religious nonsense, I immediately conclude that they are either a lying conman, or have a lukewarm IQ. There can't be any in between.
Religion is a mental illness and by far the greatest threat humanity is facing.
It's pretty incredible how the promise of eternal paradise after death turns people into utter shit lords.
view more: next ›