this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
329 points (98.2% liked)

World News

55154 readers
3892 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A video shared by Tehran Times claims to show the moment a US F-35 fighter jet was hit during a combat mission over Iranian airspace. The clip shows the aircraft appearing to take damage, with explosions, smoke trails, and the jet veering off course mid-air.


A US F-35 fighter jet was attacked during an Iranian strike and forced to make an emergency landing at a military base in the Middle East, according to CNN. The claim, first made by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), would mark the first known instance of Iran hitting one of the US military’s most advanced and expensive aircraft in the ongoing conflict in Middle East.

According to the IRGC, the stealth jet was struck by air defence systems over central Iran in the early hours of Thursday. A video shared by Tehran Times claims to show the moment a US F-35 fighter jet was hit during a combat mission over Iranian airspace. The clip shows the aircraft appearing to take damage, with explosions, smoke trails, and the jet veering off course midair.

In a statement, the IRGC said it had "struck and seriously damaged" the aircraft at around 2.50 am (local time), adding that the jet’s fate remains unclear and that there is a "high possibility" it may have crashed. The group also said the operation followed the interception of more than 125 US-Israeli drones, calling it evidence of improvements in Iran’s air defence systems.

If confirmed, the incident would mark the first time Iran has successfully targeted an F-35, a fifth-generation fighter jet that costs more than $100 million and is considered a cornerstone of US air power. Both the US and Israel have been deploying F-35s extensively since the conflict escalated on February 28.


US CONFIRMS EMERGENCY LANDING, PLAYS DOWN DAMAGE

According to CNN, US Central Command said the aircraft was "flying a combat mission over Iran" when it was forced to make an emergency landing. "The aircraft landed safely, and the pilot is in stable condition," spokesman Captain Tim Hawkins told CNN. "This incident is under investigation."

However, Washington has not issued any official statement. The Pentagon said its operations are going as planned, with Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth saying the US is "winning decisively" and that Iran’s air defences have been "flattened".

Amid escalating conflict, at least 16 US aircraft have reportedly been destroyed since the start of the war, including 10 Reaper drones, while several others have been damaged in combat or accidents.


[ADDENDUM]

The actual video of the event, plus more, from The Hindustan Times:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=YZZAGO0rkLk

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 78 points 1 week ago (6 children)

However, Washington has not issued any official statement. The Pentagon said its operations are going as planned, with Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth saying the US is "winning decisively" and that Iran’s air defences have been "flattened".

I see we're going full Baghdad Bob here.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yep.

"Time is flat circle"

angrily inhales cigarette

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago

Reminds me of a poker player losing on the river and yelling "you were drawing dead"!

Guess not, buddy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Can f35 customers ask for a refund?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I mean, you can try, but if you're not paying for the subscription to ongoing software updates, uh, YOLO, basically.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Eh, if you fly it within range of a heat seeker you get what you deserve. Looks like a skill issue tbh.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

I doubt it was the pilot's error more than the commander giving them a bad mission.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (5 children)

A plane that cost $1trillion dollars to develop was almost taken out by normal munitions. If this can be done again Americans air superiority is cooked.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

If this can be done again Americans air superiority is cooked.

Wouldn't that depend on how successful US is at shooting down Chinese planes and how many planes each one has? If China can damage one F-35 in, let's say, 5% of the missions US is sending but US can shoot down 90% of Chinese fighters it sees and they have similar numbers of planes, wouldn't US still have air superiority?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

Yeah but it has 3 more cupholders than Chinese fighter jets and Apple Carplay.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Duck US imperialism, but its stealth not bulletproof, 1 getting shot doesn't really show anything.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

But the purpose of these planes is to please shareholders.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

ding ding ding

Winner! Winner!

Oh man, Taiwan is so fucked.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Sadly yes, along with South Korea and Japan.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

And kablamo, now we have Orwell's EastAsia.

God fucking damnit.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I would be so incredibly mad as the AA battery cmdr if I witnessed a direct hit and the jet just continued to fly lol.

I can literally see the War Thunder "hit" message

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No, no you would not be.

Because now you have some of the most valuable targetting data on Earth.

Iran, Russia and China will be pouring over all of that data, using it to figure out how to replicate a successful tracking and interception with their existing systems, or new ones.

If you were a real War Thunder player, you'd be leaking that information on the forums.

... do people not get this?

That... this is the start of F35s just... not really being stealth, in at least certain situations?

Where the... US and other F35 operators... may not know what those 'certain situations' are?

6 months, a year, 2 years from now, the US no longer can just assume it will get air superiority.

That... kinda ... blows up a good deal of our military doctrine.

Do you notice how the F35 ... isn't even doing evasive manuevers?

Is not deploying countermeasures?

It didn't know it was being targetted.

That's a really big problem.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Buddy chill its not that deep. He flew too low and in the range of an IR missile battery that they failed to spot as part of their SIGINT. That's why they have video, he was so close that radar stealth literally would not matter. It even explains the small missile warhead size.

And DAS missile detectors have been pretty awful at being able to detect missiles due to their tiny package size. There's no gg ez RWR for passive tracking missiles.

They're flying sorties more brashly because they thought AA was taken care of, which is how this ambush succeeded.

Yes it's defnitley a first for successfully hitting the F-35, but this isn't some groundbreaking concept. It would have been huge news if they targeted the F-35 at a BVR range with active tracking like with a radar or data link solution.

Like I said, I'm sure the soldiers were super excited that they got a hit, but they would defnitley have preferred to have scored a full kill with a pilot ejection and subsequent capture.

[–] CovfefeKills@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What the heck is this informed speculation? There is only room for mindless speculation here on lemmy. You need to be as ill-informed as possible to be able to comment on these things.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Still a better experience than reddit lol

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Lol, the modern warfare hot indicator. Listen, you can hear it.

x

See?

x

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Fucking hitboxes are janky AF in this latest update!!

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Welp.

That was much faster than even I was expecting.

[–] just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Iran said they were holding back due to ramadan cuz its a holy month and they shouldn't be doing war in holy months.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Eid Mubarak, America.

I'm not glad for this war, but given that it is happening, I gotta admit that I am glad to see US hubris challenged so thoroughly

[–] Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

God damn russia hit the jackpot getting this pedophile in office

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago (4 children)

That's it then. Canada, buy those Gripens and avoid the F35s.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All of American's adversaries are going to want to exchange notes with Iran on how they managed that.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Looks like it was done via thermals, stealth aircraft is for radar to my knowledge, and maybe not the most effective against thermal targeting. I could be wrong though

Pretty much, thermals require being much closer and are only good from certain directions, so the stealth is entirely focused against radar missiles that can be shot from far out of sight and don't need to be behind the enemy

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Stealth just means low observable, there are ways to reduce the IR signature of jet engines, at the expense of either thrust or even more complex and expensive systems, such as what the F-22/F-23 use.

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Still safer than Boeing.

[–] killea@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Ok... I watched less than one minute of that video. And previewed ahead a little bit. All I can see is stock and/or AI generated imagery and video and inserted headlines, and loads of Russian and Chinese astroturf/bots in the comments. I mean, its Hindustan time that's what I'd expect.

If the F35 got hit by AA and landed, it speaks well of the aircraft; let's be clear about that. I'm gonna presume that its a resource that the US and Israel have been overusing since the start. Which means Iran has had a lot of opportunity to shoot at them. All stealth means is that their head-on radar cross-section is extremely small, and the coating and shape of the craft refract radar signal, rather than reflect. I'm surprised more haven't been hit or lost. Hell I'm surprised a Shahed drone swarm hasn't tried for a carrier. It seems Iran is using what they have to disrupt and upset the world's energy economy, which is probably the smarter option, for them.

All this "war" proves out to me is that we are that much further into our third world war. And it seems like that is exactly what the vile excrement in power right now seem to want. It's a great distraction from the fact that we are fucked.

Edit: I always like to leave little notes when I leave a comment I put a little effort into, and am subsequently reminded that I am wrong for having any faith in the human race in general.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm gonna presume that its a resource that the US and Israel have been overusing since the start.

Oh?

Why would you presume that?

All stealth means is that their head-on radar cross-section is extremely small, and the coating and shape of the craft refract radar signal, rather than reflect.

You ever heard of the concept of an ambush?

You... appear weaker than you are, absent, and then you set a trap?

Also: $2 trillion dollars.

Could have bought a lot of healthcare with that.

I'm surprised more haven't been hit or lost.

Not surprising if we haven't been using them that much and have instead been using a lot of ballistic missiles, untill we basically ran out of them.

You know like how Ukraine went early on, everybody blew their load early, then had to figure out ways to try and get the same range out of stuff launched from fighters/attack aircraft, like the guided+boosted glide bombs?

Hell I'm surprised a Shahed drone swarm hasn't tried for a carrier.

That's not surprising given how incredibly rational Iran has been acting.

It doesn't escalate first.

We do. Then they respond in kind.

Sinking a US carrier and causing roughly a 9/11's worth of deaths would uh... be quite an escalation, and they're aware of that.

Fortunately, it seems the sailors on the Ford seemed to do a good enough job of stuffing tshirts into the toilets and setting the laundry room on fire, that that particular carrier uh, removed itself from action, functionally.

It seems Iran is using what they have to disrupt and upset the world's energy economy, which is probably the smarter option, for them.

It is so insanely obviously the smarter strategy that for decades, that's been the conclusion of Western military analysts, and Iran has just also ... more or less just said that is what they would do.

[–] killea@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Not a clue about the nature of your hostility, so I'll just leave you with it. I was mostly reactive regarding the poor quality of a side's propaganda, and musing on it. I feel like I'd be wasting my time responding to surreptitious bullet points.

Edit: I'm not sure how other aren't seeing how you have turned things we agree upon into point of perceived attack, but you're good. I admit, you like hitting the enter key twice a alot. My original point that your source video for this is obvious garbage still stands. Of course, I am not disputing events as reported. You should try paragraphs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deacon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you implying that the laundry room fire was set on purpose by some of the sailors?

Genuine question. It seems plausible and I’m not sure why I took the official story at face value but I haven’t seen anything to contradict it myself.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Are you implying that the laundry room fire was set on purpose by some of the sailors?

Yes.

Its being investigated.

They already found the tshirts stuffed into the extremely fancy, vaccuum pump system that comprises the toilets.

Yeah I can see you accidentally dropping your phone in the shitter.

Not multiple tshirts.

... It's kinda like they fragged the aircraft carrier itself, but in a way that didn't kill anybody.

Clever.

The Dems did go through that whole episode of 'You do not have to follow illegal orders.'

Declaring 'No quarter', publically, in a televised press conference... that's not allowed by the DoD's own rules, and is widely regarded as a war crime, in and of itself.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago

I just know we're all just waiting for their toddler in chief to publicly call the pilots losers and suckers. "I like pilots who don't get shot down."

[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Remember when the Yugoslavian army shot down a couple of F117 stealth bombers using some crappy old russian gear and the Americans had to stop jerking each other off about their invisible killing machine and take their toys home? It's like that.

[–] Lagviper@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Good for the pilot he made it back to base but that F35 is as good as lost more than likely with the costs of repair these things have

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

A video shared by Tehran Times claims to show the moment a US F-35 fighter jet was hit during a combat mission over Iranian airspace. The clip shows the aircraft appearing to take damage, with explosions, smoke trails, and the jet veering off course midair.

Where's the video showing this.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›