He isn't staring in it. He's dead.
this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
214 points (93.5% liked)
Fuck AI
6579 readers
2287 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Well, being dead of course he's not going to be staring at much. Maybe the twinkly ether of the afterlife?
Now what his AI generated likeness can be starring in, is another issue.
Not sure if that makes much of a difference. We know AI has problems telling how many 'R' s words have
load more comments
(1 replies)
Guess you haven't seen Steven Seagal's performances in the past decade or so
Seagal's not dead. He’s just fat, lazy, incompetent, and stupid. I look forward to Space Ice shitting on the "movie" he's supposed to release this year.
hes in RUSSIA as court jester for putin,
God forbid, a new and talented actor is discovered...
They take him because his face is known and loved. What reason would there be to take someone nobody knows? You can make up a new, imaginary actor and not pay anyone, not even family. What a wonderful world that'll be, without the need for pesky humans!
What?
replace the with /s and read again.
only that /s doesn't really fit, because it's a mix of sarcasm and hate and it's getting harder to cope.
it was pretty clear to me, don't overthink it
Okay I thought so, but the hard shift between the first and 2nd sentence made me confused who you were being sarcastic to.
I think the realization came while writing and I was too lazy to adjust. I'm tired of ... all of this.
You're fine. There just seems like a lot more people in the comments rage baiting lately, but I don't like catching innocent people in the crossfire.
load more comments
(1 replies)
My headcanon is that everything after 2008 was all reboots and remakes and now revived actors, and that’s why all the Star Trek references end there.
Ghoulish
Essentially grave robbing memory instead of rings and jewelry. The rot grows.
Well I guess this is how I found out that Val Kilmer died.
Yo tambien. I have sadness now.
This is utterly disgusting.
will star in the drama As Deep As the Grave.
Though at least the irony isn’t missed.
load more comments
(1 replies)
So a cartoon character is copyrighted for 75 years after the author dies, but someone's actual visual clone can just be brought back from the dead and made to do whatever?
The Kilmer estate is signing off on it because they feel it's an important film Val wanted to contribute to. Doesn't make it any less gross for me, but at least there's some oversight to his image I guess.
That just means someone is getting paid and doesn't give a fuck about Val Kilmer
Then they should have insisted that they mupify his corpse
Nice. I'm putting that in my will.
It's the rights to a person's likeness that can be made into a legal property that heirs can control.
This is why you don't see much marketing with, say, Elvis Presley's actual face (he was an actor - marginally capable for certain, but one nonetheless) unless it will be allowed by his heirs.
Look at it from the angle that an actor's FACE is their performative trademark, in the same way a singer's distinctive voice is theirs, or a writer's words, or a musician's composition.
Not just likeness, Scarlett Johansson successfully sued a Fr*nch author for portraying her in a novel.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Has anyone thought this through to its logical conclusion? If we're constantly resurrecting old talent using AI, or whatever the tech du jour is, then won't we stagnate culturally?
Culturally, scientifically, intelligently, you name it we’ve reached the peak. AI is just recycling what humans have thought and said, According to our new ai overlords we just coast from here
Then why doesn't life feel like coasting?
You must not be a billionaire.
That's a problem for next quarter, kiddo.
Answering for Capitalism – follow the money.
No, the cost of doing this is far more than hiring an actor.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Here is what I find funny, there was years in the early 2000's where he was alive and healthy and he was not getting great roles or as much attention.
Now he is dead and they are trying to revive him. Like it feels so silly to try to bring back someone with AI to make it like he is alive and healthy again. Those days are gone. Executives are using AI to live in denial.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I thought the Actors' Strikes were supposed to prevent this bullshit? What the actual fuck.
I think that only applies to companies that employ unionized workers.
This is absolutely bullshit, but also half-assed cowardice. Like if you're going to put dead people who cannot consent to the use of their image in your project, why not make Martin Luther King Jr the next T'challa in the MCU? Why not make Pope Benedict fight the mandelorian?
Or macho man randy savage.
load more comments
(4 replies)
His family is okay with this??? Are they that fucking greedy???
Read the article. This was apparently a project that meant a lot to him and was on his dance card before the cancer..
Hs family is fully on board and if it represents a memorial for him and a subject he was passionate about, what's the beef?
No.
The low just keeps getting lower doesn’t it?
More weaponization of nostalgia.
Not even worth pirating.
I'm not gonna watch it, but can I anti-watch it, so my 'view' counts negatively against it?
load more comments
(4 replies)
...Well, it was a matter of time, I suppose.
He's probably huckleberrying in his grave right now.
view more: next ›