this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
95 points (88.6% liked)

Firefox

36 readers
1 users here now

The latest news and developments on Firefox and Mozilla, a global non-profit that strives to promote openness, innovation and opportunity on the web.

You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Related

Rules

While we are not an official Mozilla community, we have adopted the Mozilla Community Participation Guidelines as far as it can be applied to a bin.

Rules

  1. Always be civil and respectful
    Don't be toxic, hostile, or a troll, especially towards Mozilla employees. This includes gratuitous use of profanity.

  2. Don't be a bigot
    No form of bigotry will be tolerated.

  3. Don't post security compromising suggestions
    If you do, include an obvious and clear warning.

  4. Don't post conspiracy theories
    Especially ones about nefarious intentions or funding. If you're concerned: Ask. Please don’t fuel conspiracy thinking here. Don’t try to spread FUD, especially against reliable privacy-enhancing software. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Show credible sources.

  5. Don't accuse others of shilling
    Send honest concerns to the moderators and/or admins, and we will investigate.

  6. Do not remove your help posts after they receive replies
    Half the point of asking questions in a public sub is so that everyone can benefit from the answers—which is impossible if you go deleting everything behind yourself once you've gotten yours.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 84 points 2 weeks ago

Cute, but I don't think a new mascot is what Firefox desperately needs right now.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 79 points 2 weeks ago

Kit was created by a team of people, not generated by AI. And Kit isn’t an AI assistant or a chatbot.

Glad they cleared that up right away. The only mentions of AI are practically apologies, which is a good sign. I guess bullying works.

In the end, we agreed that Kit isn’t a fox nor a red panda. Kit is a Firefox, its own creature — with attributes from both a fox and a red panda, and perhaps a little fire magic.

This feels like it's for the kind of demographic that the platonic ideal of Firefox should represent.

[–] zener_diode@feddit.org 68 points 2 weeks ago

To all the people who read neither the article, nor the other comments pointing it out:

This is NOT an AI chatbot!

And I think it's a great idea! And Kit looks cute!

Maybe Mozilla finally noticed that most Firefox users are not all that enthusiastic about AI and would rather see development on other parts of Firefox.

[–] ace@lemmy.ananace.dev 50 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm really happy to see a piece of news about "... your companion for ..." and it not being about yet another soulless LLM chatbot.

[–] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah thats what I initially assumed it was which is pretty sad

[–] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is it not? I'm so jaded that when I see a company trot out anything cute, squishy, or colorful (be it a logo, character, or whatever), I assume it's another slopbot.

[–] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Actually went and read the thing to be sure but yeah it's just like a branding/mascot thingy, not a bot

[–] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Interesting. What's the over/under on when they hook it up to a bot tho?

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

It seems unlikely. The mascot has been around for a while, and it's usually in notifications.

To paraphrase a popular tech YouTuber, Kit is just trying to help.

[–] loonsun@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They literally designed it without a mouth to illustrate it isnt supposed to talk so the answer is very low chance

[–] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

Loooooolll....

[–] hesh@quokk.au 4 points 2 weeks ago

Definitely thought that's what this was until reading your comment

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 33 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

The only AI named Kit I accept lives in a 1982 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 27 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I understand the reference and know the source, so I'll second you on that.

But... It was K.I.T.T.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 11 points 2 weeks ago

I took some artistic liberties. This isn't even an AI agent but just a mascot.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I always meant to look it up, but never got around to it. Today's the day I learn what it stood for!

"Knight Industries Two Thousand." Huh. Kind of a letdown, but at least now I know!

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

And then there was its evil twin, K.A.R.R.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago

Knight Automated Roving Robot

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, I remember him! I never looked that one up, either..."Knight Automated Roving Robot." Better!

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Huh, I thought it was Kybernetic Intelligence Thingy Thing.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

That would be better than abbreviating 2000 as TT instead of 2K!

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

This isn't an AI. Kit is just the name of their redesigned mascot. They literally said in the article that it wasn't designed with AI and isn't an AI chatbot.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

as much as llms suck. if I had the money, I'd restore a 1982 Pontiac firebird and it an llm with a voice model based on kit. that can control the infotainment and had access to the car's odb and other functions.

all running on a gpu inside the car. using a local model

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If it's a locally running model trained from ethically sourced data, you'd already be doing better than 99.9% of the piece of shit techbro CEOs out there even if it barely could turn the radio on...

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm torn on which is worse.

[–] ByteMe@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I like this. Let's make the internet a bit more fun again, everything is cold and soulless nowadays

[–] Statick@feddit.online 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah this is great. KDE has had Konqi and Katie forever. I like that Firefox is getting it's own mascot as well.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

I absolutely LOVE their modern designs. The early Konqi 3D model design was just straight up ugly, IMO.

[–] purplerabbit@piefed.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 weeks ago

I love him. He's adorable. 🧡

[–] Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 weeks ago

Kit is fucking adorable, I love them.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 11 points 2 weeks ago

i miss the cute animal sketches they used on error pages a few years ago. like the confused little dinosaur with the map.

[–] eclipse7@feddit.nu 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

e621 presence in 3... 2....

[–] cheat700000007@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Think it will be faster than r34 sites?

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's an animal mascot, so I'd guess a solid "maybe."

[–] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Kit has been around for a while, just never really front and center like this. Theres already some art there, though im sure soon there will be a lot more.

[–] jahtnamas@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

e621 presence in 3…

try 4 months ago

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I want Kit stickers for my laptop. I will pay for them. Mozilla please take my money and give me adorable stickers.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Clippy for the web!!! Exactly what we needed!

[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

In what way?

[–] fuzzyfirefox@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

At one point, we asked ourselves whether or not Kit should look more like a red panda (leading to a brief detour into red panda references).

In the end, we agreed that Kit isn’t a fox nor a red panda. Kit is a Firefox, its own creature — with attributes from both a fox and a red panda, and perhaps a little fire magic.

Just my 2 cents, but since Red Pandas are endangered, I would have preferred that the made Kit a Red Panda.

[–] RedSeries@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago

Same. Firefox is a literal nickname for red pandas!

[–] atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

the firefox mascot can now use fire bending

chrome is going to fall behind in the browser wars

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Great, how much money was wasted on this thing that's not an essential part of a 100% standards-compliant browser?

Because that's what Firefox needs to be. That's all it should ever have been.

[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So you want a browser nobody uses?

Or do you want a browser with a good ux? Because this is part of a good ux.

As long as it's driven by open standards and not DoubleClick's monetization plans, I'm of the mindset that either the users will find it, or else those who care need to build a new and different network that's actively toxic to advertising.

UX is a secondary concern after decrapifying the engine and the browser and making the browser an actual user agent, rather than a virtual machine. Possibly even tertiary.

[–] ADKSilence@piefed.social -1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm just glad Firefox is free, because with the way they've been doing things the last couple iterations I dont see a very good future for it.

Thank dog there're alternatives out there.

[–] Lawnman23@piefed.social -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, this makes me give two shits about FF now because a new logo/mascot...?

[–] Lawnman23@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Since the FF purists can’t get over their hump, may I suggest a far better alternative: https://www.waterfox.com/

[–] TourCookie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You know that Waterfox is build from Firefox rigth?

[–] Lawnman23@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yep, started with what was good and refined it to what is far better.

load more comments
view more: next ›