this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
421 points (99.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

30700 readers
1836 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] First_Thunder@lemmy.zip 162 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Oh yeah, that’s the new hexadecimal IPV8

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 66 points 2 weeks ago
[–] dracs@programming.dev 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] toynbee@piefed.social 5 points 2 weeks ago

I try to avoid "this" style comments, but I genuinely don't know how else to respond to this one. It was hilarious. I literally (by which I actually mean "literally") laughed out loud.

[–] mergingapples@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hello, I am apparently an idiot. What is wrong with that IP address that people can tell it's an immediate phishing scam?

[–] Turious@leaf.dance 39 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

IP addresses can't have segment numbers going over 255.

[–] mergingapples@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ahhhh. Thank you. Now the Ipv over 4 jokes make sense.

[–] ghodawalaaman@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

wait what? I feel like I am left behind in the tech. I only know about ipv4 and ipv6 😭😭😭

[–] tyler@programming.dev 47 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They’re making a joke. The numbers in the IP are way too high for v4, but the format isn’t v6, so it’s a “new range” of v8.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] teddypolice@feddit.org 8 points 2 weeks ago

at 192.512.512.10.0/42.

[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

In the drawer right next to IPv5

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

IPv4 was easy to remember. IPv6 made it very hard. This implies that IPv8 has to be base64 encoded.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 150 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I often assume this kind of thing is part of an effort to filter for idiots

If you know that's an invalid IP address, you're probably less likely to fall for the scam after the scammer has put the setup work in. So if they filter you out before a scammer has to spend any actual effort on you, that means more time they can spend scamming people who might be more likely to fall for it

That's why these things often have egregious spelling errors and other seemingly obvious red flags

[–] zo0@programming.dev 73 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Just because I know what a valid IP is doesn't mean I'm not an idiot 😎

[–] toynbee@piefed.social 16 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Let's see you write a regex for one, then we'll decide.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago

Why would anyone want to do that when there are dozens on stackoverflow?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ulterno@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago

That's not the probability they are looking for.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 48 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I do believe that is confirmed canon.

[–] entwine@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

I remember reading about this many years ago as an explanation for why there were so many banner ads that looked like they were created in MS paint.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's possible in general, but I don't think that's what's going on specifically here; not many people read IP addresses in such detail to notice such things at first glance.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 11 points 2 weeks ago

It’s exactly what is happening, they’re filtering out people who know what an IP address is and can contain so that they get fewer time wasters.

[–] teddypolice@feddit.org 15 points 2 weeks ago

Movies and TV shows actually do it this way to prevent actual machines getting group hugged.

Like in that one X-Files episode, where the Lone Gunmen hack into an invalid IP.

[–] sniggleboots@europe.pub 8 points 2 weeks ago

It's also why there's usually bad spelling or grammar in those e-mails as well

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 95 points 2 weeks ago

It's not often you see IPv5

[–] Sv443@sh.itjust.works 47 points 2 weeks ago

This is just an IPv5, they're quite rare in the wild

[–] thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works 47 points 2 weeks ago

In addition to what others have already posted, I suspect that this might be an attempt to evade spam/phishing filters that are looking for an IP address with a specific regular expression. Having a fake IP address that doesn’t match the traditional ^((25\[0-5]|(2\[0-4]|1\d|\[1-9]|)\d)\\.?\b){4}$ format might let this message slip through.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Took me a second to figure out what was wrong with the email... I choked on a laugh when I saw the IP

What a bizarre, narrow window of knowledge that person must have

[–] ThetaDecay@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Alternatively, the scammer is saving themselves some time; more educated, well-versed people will see the ip and not bother calling in. Less savvy people who don't know the IP address is bogus are likely easier to scam if they call the phone number or reply to the mail.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] new_world_odor@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

That's exactly the reaction they want. That aspect of the scam helps filter out people who might be smart enough to properly retaliate if they were to get scammed out of 20k or whatever.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 38 points 2 weeks ago

New address space unlocked

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 32 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

For the uninitiated, the joke is:

spoilerEach number should has a maximum value of 255.

[–] imjustmsk@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (9 children)

The fact that I have a test in school today, and this is probable questiom in it, and this post reminded me of it,  thanks I guess?

EDIT: wait, so each number should be maximum of 255? Why did I think it was just the last numbe :|

anyway thanks again for the unsolicited coincidental heads up

[–] REDACTED 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'm still angry even 15 years later after a teacher lowered my grade just because I checked "USB" as capable technologies for video transmission. There are literally USB monitors.

Granted, back then it really wasn't popular and bandwidth was shit, but it was capable of it.

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

USB to VGA dongles were definitely a thing over 15 years ago. USB 2.0 could manage it fineish. Maybe not at high resolutions and refresh rates, but it could handle a monitor just fine.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] saltnotsugar@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

Jesus Christ, that’s Jason Bourne’s IP address!

[–] entwine@programming.dev 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slampisko@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

Sorry, that's my IP. I was trying something

[–] Bonsoir@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 weeks ago

Please, do not share the button. It's gross.

[–] gergolippai@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

no shit they don't recognize that IP :-D but hey, they also single handedly solved the IP4 address space crisis!

[–] python@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Ok I admit I didn't get it at first because I expected the joke to be that the IP is 127.0.0.1 and didn't look closer at the digits

[–] shawn@thagoat.org 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

That cancer support line should buy this one also

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Janx@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago

I think I see why the login attempt was unsuccessful!

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

Spain has better food, better beaches, hotter women, better fiesta, better weather, better lifestyle, better IP's.

Deal with it.

[–] AffineConnection@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

They just wanted to make doubly sure that whoever they are phishing is an idiot before they proceed further.

[–] schuelermine@leminal.space 4 points 1 week ago

I was surprised to find that this doesn’t work at all.

For instance, 300 is considered a valid IP by e.g. Firefox, typing 300/ into Firefox will navigate to http://0.0.1.44/. I was expecting this to be interpreted as just Σ 256ⁿ × dₙ mod 256⁴. But it isn’t, Firefox won’t accept this (it performs a web search instead). Neither will curl (which tries to look up a domain by this name).

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

Probably outer space

load more comments
view more: next ›