this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
814 points (96.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

45430 readers
1603 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It gets my goat that people think it's a good option. There are plenty of articles explaining some of the many issues with it, but a few are:

  1. It's run by anti-LGBTQ+ crypto bros.
  2. It has ads right out of the box.
  3. It collected donations towards people who never signed up for them - then held them to ransom in exchange for the kind of information you should never share on the Internet.
  4. They're a for-profit advertising company. "Privacy-centric" my elbow.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mikina@programming.dev 253 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

It's a for profit ad company making a "privacy first browser".

Thinking for literaly a second about that sentence should tell you all you need to know.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 163 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)
  1. it's fucking Chromium

Go use some Firefox-derivative like Librewolf or Fennec, like a sane person.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah, this is important. Fuck Google. I will only ever use a chromium browser if I have to for work or for a misbehaving website.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I will reject the misbehaving website rather than resort to using Chromium.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Occasionally though, life requires using a shit website. I do avoid it if possible though

[–] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Your attitude is very reasonable. I strive to be as unreasonable as I can.

reference


“The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.” ― George Bernard Shaw

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 133 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They also tried to get away with URL injection. Do not use Brave.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Basically the thing that turned the internet against Honey, but when a homophobic piece of shit does it it's fine

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 103 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They’re a for-profit advertising company. “Privacy-centric” my elbow.

a for-profit company partially funded by the billionaire Peter Thiel, of Palantir fame. the same Palantir spying on Americans in order to allow nazis to round up immigrants and throw them into concentration camps. the same Peter Thiel that said democracy is not compatible with freedom.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

The same one who wants to create the apocalypse and believes the anti-Christ is anyone who isn't fascistic

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 59 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Just mentioned how I didn't like people recommending this like last week and got "ok" as a response lol. Some people are just ignorant and don't care.

[–] hemmetti@lemmy.world 54 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Brave is just a shitty browser. Did not know they were anti-freedom kind of people. Makes browser no-no.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] D1re_W0lf@piefed.social 43 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I did not know Brendan Eich was ousted from Mozilla and launched Brave because he was a homophobe who funded anti-LGBT+ campaigns 😬

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 36 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

They added referrals to links you clicked. If there is one thing a browser should do its go to the link you click without modification.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Cekan14@lemmy.org 28 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I use Firefox. I know it's not perfect, but it's not that bad.

And if I didn't, I'd use Vivaldi. Only reason I don't is I do prefer open source whenever possible and, well, Firefox isn't Chromium.

[–] outerspace@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

Firefox is the only browser that has mobile extensions, making it the only choice

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 26 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Yeah it kinda mystifies me that anyone is still recommending that shitty bigotware.

In the emulation scene, RetroArch is in a similar boat if I'm understanding things correctly. Awful maintainers, but people keep recommending it and supporting it. Sucks too, because there are even fewer alternatives there.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Also, the Brave defenders in this section… holy moly.

Some folks simply cannot admit they made a questionable choice. They picked it and use it, so everyone else must be wrong.

I’ve met people like this in real life.

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 weeks ago

It's also a chromium browser.

[–] pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (9 children)

I have been using Brave for its out of the box ad and tracker blocking. I'd been uncomfortable with the new AI features and had always been skeptical of the crypto integration, but it wasn't until this post that I realized it was appreciably worse than Firefox on those counts, nor how bad the people running it are.

Obviously, I'm now looking for other options. I've seen some good recs for desktop browsers elsewhere on this post, but what I'm not seeing is a lot of good mobile browser suggestions that will have the desired features. What would the folks here suggest for an e/OS browsing experience with similar or better privacy and ad blocking options? I know there's Firefox, but A. With all the AI it keeps pushing, I'm sure there has to be better and B. I do also have mobile Firefox but have found it substantially less usable for my habit of browsing with a zillion tabs both non-incognito and incognito, so I mostly had only been it when I couldn't get a video to play in Brave.

I am, obviously, willing to run de-Googled Chromium, but if something else is going to actually support 100+ tabs in a performant fashion I'd be happy to totally de-Chromium too.

I also use the shit out of profiles on Brave desktop, though mobile doesn't support it. Do the Firefox forks like Waterfox have a similar option on desktop? Does another browser? I know it's a feature Chrome has because I do sadly have to use Chrome for work, so I would expect at least the de-Googled Chromium-based ones would?

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Firefox (and its forks) have an integrated profile manager, though it's not always intuitive to figure out how to get to it. LibreWolf is the fork I seem to always go back to, and it has zero slop.

I use containers. Right-click on the new tab button and pick a container to open the tab in. There's also an add-on that will do this automatically for you when you visit a specific website, so if you want every site to live in its own container, you can do that too.

Personally I just use its built-in cross-site cookie blocking, but multiple ways to do the same thing.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lemon@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I’ve been using Vivaldi (chromium-based) for about three years now. It’s customizable and has been generally solid. Also has a couple of unique tab management features. Doesn’t have builtin ad blocking afaik. But for that I use adguard desktop and route all my traffic through it, which filters out ads regardless of which browser I’m in. On iOS I can recommend Orion by kagi. It’s the only other webkit browser besides Safari, runs light, and has decent builtin ad blocking

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

It’s because no-one knows any alternatives.

If one wants a Chrome-based browser that isn’t Chrome, Brave is the highest-profile one by orders of magnitude. Next is a bunch of high-SEO scamware before honest projects like Vivaldi or Helium are even a whisper.


…So I don’t really blame folks for using Brave. They aren't omniscient, and an honest effort to avoid Chrome is still a positive.

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I don't blame folks for using it.

I do blame folks for not reading up before recommending it.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

FWIW I remember a former colleague who recommended it to me and his argument was about the cryptocurrency you "earn" from it.

I asked him if he could withdraw it. I asked him if he tried. He said not yet but he would. He came back to me few days later saying something along the line that "it's not straightforward" which was a polite way to say he didn't manage yet. He worked in IT.

To be clear I'm not saying it's a scam or that one can't use the crypto "earned" from it but at least back then, few years ago, some people were just riding on the hope, or even faith, that it would amount to something yet it seemed made in such a way to just hold.

So... not a scam but not exactly empowering users IMHO.

[–] LaoiseFu@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

I had no idea about any of this. Have been using brave on android for a few weeks and very happy with it. What would you recommend instead?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] EgoNo4@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

Could someone please recommend an alternative? 😓 I used DuckDuckGo for a while but I NEED something that supports extensions...

[–] OpenHammer6677@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago

I currently use Waterfox which is a fork of Firefox

[–] 404@lemmy.zip 27 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Firefox forks like Librewolf (or Ironfox for mobile) are good.

Also Vivaldi if you don't mind proprietary.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

I've been using vanilla Firefox

[–] cybirdman@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

Please try Zen browser. I can't go back to any other browser since I switched

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Astertheprince@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think a lot of pro-Brave people are astroturfers, or heavily influenced by astroturfers. They are definitely not a first choice by any privacy advocate worth their salt.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›